The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent:
Storyline:
In this action-packed comedy, Nicolas Cage plays Nick Cage, channeling his iconic characters as he's caught between a superfan and a CIA agent. Given I wouldn't come close to calling myself a superfan nor a huge follower of Nicholas Cage (to which this film would have spoken to this crowd differently), that possibly and most likely credits to the fact that this film was just OK for the everyday watcher. From weird implications and timing to a rocky sense of self, The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent was a bigger letdown than a pleasant surprise. While the concept of this film is worth the applause, as the self-awareness of how actors are perceived and the mocking humor that dives deep into character, the creativity is unmatched. That said, the implication and execution of said details are the problems that become an issue. Introducing too many characters with full subplots, the jumbled mess of intertwining their backstories and relevance becomes more confusing than anything. While a majority of these supporting roles were left high and dry at the times they were needed most, the others fizzled out their character arcs with uneventful conclusions and predictable resolutions. Never failing to keep the audience engaged - regardless if it was with a genuine laugh or just pure amusement - the dry writing and snippets of pop culture references will keep you on your toes. Although this wasn't as enjoyable as I would have liked, it is both an odd and low-stakes watch that is a fresh change of pace, despite its flaws. 6/10
6.5/10
|
Dog:
Storyline:
Two former Army Rangers are paired against their will on the road trip of a lifetime, Briggs and Lulu, a Belgian Malinois. Whether it was naive of me to think a movie centered around a dog as the main character would be good (when they never are everything they're cracked up to be) or the hope that the unspoken, fun appeal of Channing Tatum would hold it together, Dog has the right idea but struggles to keep the audience engaged. Being too easily predictable, it horrifyingly came down to being able to guess the word-for-word responses and interactions within any given point of the script. While uninvolving screenwriting is partially to blame, the rigid delivery of lines is nothing close to inviting. Feeling as though there is nothing relevant within this story to provide the viewers with, this loses any important features it would have had within the first few moments on screen. Blame it on poor, unfunny storytelling or just the fact that some screenplays don't hold the weight to be a motion picture, some things are better left undone. From too hard to believe subplots that are thrown in at every tangible moment, it becomes hard to take this seriously when its own doing diminishes its theme. A comedy shouldn't cause an effort for you to wrap your head around goofy circumstances, when they should just be fun. But, there is too much heavy subject matter going on to latch onto either the protagonist, life lesson, or any other important thing this overly tries to portray. 5/10
5/10
|
The Heat:
Storyline:
An uptight FBI Special Agent is paired with a foul-mouthed Boston cop to take down a ruthless drug lord. While there will always be a time and a place for films like The Heat, there is no denying the utter stupidity and cheap construction it comes from. Quickly created for a brisk laugh, though getting the job done, it's not special. The chemistry between Sandra Bullock and Melissa McCarthy, is the reason this works. Playing the stereotypes and typecast they have become does get repetitive, yet will always be believable. Effectively staying in their lanes, the banter and progression create a tone that heightens the easy progression. Looking too closely at this film can discourage the laugh it provides while glancing over said issues makes them more apparent. Having a happy medium between the two, accepting the critical inconsistencies, and soaking in the slapstick humor, this film is rewatchable and worth the watch, even if it's not a favorite. 6/10
7/10
|
Horrible Bosses 2:
Storyline:
Dale, Kurt and Nick decide to start their own business but things don't go as planned because of a slick investor, prompting the trio to pull off a harebrained and misguided kidnapping scheme. Following a film that has no substance, surprisingly, Horrible Bosses 2 is just as funny, if not funnier than its predecessor. Sprucing up the average screenplay with lively performances and comedic delivery, the telling of this story creates a fun and humorous watch, despite its shaky developmental roots. Given the same descriptive, fun energy of the returning cast, the new additions are just as creative. Though the subject matter is, without doubt, originating from a solely dumb, not just dumb humor standpoint, the energy of the cast having a great time speaks louder than its foreseeable construction. Although, there is a time and place for this film, as it is not an everyday watch, nor is it a must-see. While its comedy that's great in the moment, that's just it, only in the moment. Arguably, you can start anywhere within the story and watch at about any time and catch on quickly; easy watching can only carry a cheaply made story so far. 5/10
7/10
|
Hall Pass:
Storyline:
Rick and Fred, two husbands who are having difficulty in their marriages, are given a Hall Pass by their wives: for one week, they can do whatever they want. If you're a fan of dumb comedies and/or Jason Sudeikis and Owen Wilson, Hall Pass is simply sure to be diverting. Yet, even with being a dedicated fan of either, this faulty product is quite hard to enjoy as it is just plainly not as funny as other things. While having a decorated cast, you genuinely would think this would be better than it was; however, wishful thinking never gets you anywhere. Whether it's from expecting more from individuals who truly are funnier than what was delivered or the fact that there is no light way to put that this just wasn't good, this is too easily forgettable and non-striking. With all the negatives considered, and not to fully tear this to shreds, something has to be said for a light-hearted and breezy watch, which is sometimes all that you want. While I would not put this high on the list for this category, for what it's worth, it serves a purpose of being quick. 4/10
4/10
|
The Mighty Ducks:
Storyline:
A self-centered Minnesota lawyer is sentenced to community service coaching a rag tag youth hockey team. Plain and simple: The Mighty Ducks is not a good film; however, it has you questioning your standards of why bad films are sometimes enjoyable. Being incredibly entertaining, despite the uncomfortable, second-hand embarrassment and terribly predictable lines, this has its notable, awkward, and mostly family-driven moments that make it a classic BAM! film. The nature of Emilio Estevez, especially in this role, is not too far from being just bad. Underdeveloped and not even trying to make a difference in the product he's creating, there are better things by him and in the genre. Though, for argument's sake, the specific vibe it takes for this type of film was successful, but it doesn't make it any less cheaply produced. With all things considered, the child actors were well-portrayed (especially given the fact that they can make or break screenplays) and the collective tone produces a heart-warming and full-spirited self-regulated story. Having a beginning, middle, and end, with foreseeable events, cheesy interactions and all, this is easy-going, fun, and watchable for all ages, not to mention it being this way and is over 25 years old. This isn't a go-to nor is it the best BAM! film to be, but it deserves a watch. 4/10
6.5/10
|
Three Amigos!
Storyline:
Three actors accept an invitation to a Mexican village to perform their onscreen bandit fighter roles, unaware that it is the real thing. If anything could describe the humor of Steve Martin and Chevy Chase combined, it would be the pure stupidity of Three Amigos! that somehow works. Though this is more bad than good, and wavering on the brink of just not being funny at all, this film is watchable solely because of its stars. That said, the real star of the show is neither Martin nor Chase, no matter how over-the-top they may be, but Martin Short. Having few moments to himself, he turns them into quotable and comedic snippets not because of the script, but because of his deliverance. Showcasing that (especially at the time) you don't have to be the most well-known in the room to make a difference, his un-scriptable, random, individualized movements are as fun as they are talented. On the contrary, sometimes enough is enough, and that is a notion this film never learned. Extending and exaggerating moments long after they are due makes for what was once funny turn into too drawn out to deserve a laugh. All in all, a film such as this would never be able to be made in today's age for multiple reasons. Though dim-witted and careless, from critical mistakes to a simply poor screenplay, this is still watchable 30 years plus after its release with a lively cast and an uncomplicated progression. 4.5/10
6.5/10
|
Dirty Rotten Scoundrels:
Storyline:
Two con men try to settle their rivalry by betting on who can swindle a young American heiress out of fifty thousand dollars first. With Steve Martin's classic humorous demeanor paired with Michael Caine's sophisticated class, Dirty Rotten Scoundrels takes a comedic twist onto a familiar juxtaposed partnership. Having its moments of wacky comedy and expected predictable actions, for the most part, this is pretty convincing. Featuring a balanced storyline that is imaginable, this builds up its characters and does not blast the audience with only jokes. While more of a mellow comedy, this was not as funny as it could have been. Getting into repetitive lines and foreseeable movements may add to the entertainment value, but falls into being like all the other films from the time. Given this is worth the laugh, keeps you engaged throughout its screen time, and is over 30 years old but doesn't date itself in the slightest, this is more in-depth and complex than it looks. Proving to stay within its limit and be well-created for what it's worth, this is whimsical and lighthearted but in an orchestrated manner. 7/10
7.5/10
|
Horrible Bosses:
Storyline:
Three friends conspire to murder their awful bosses when they realize they are standing in the way of their happiness. While this is enjoyable and laughable at the time, after the fact, this feels just like everything else. Arguably, though, that’s why we go to the dirty humor slapstick comedies, such as these - to entertain. Yet, this is not a waste of time, it rather is the safe bet in being something you’ve seen before in a slightly different presentation. Giving a nod to the quick on its feet dialogue and witty remarks that feature the personality and humor of its stars, this is creative and intuitive. However, these jokes and comedic script are not powerful enough to make them quotable or deserve to be talked about after, which is a must for must-see-comedies. Take it for what you will, this keeps you intrigued even if it’s not able to put you into the story. The cast is having fun, which makes for a lighthearted and easily paced film. Horrible Bosses is not the first on the list to recommend, but it isn't the last, either. Although alluring the audience with its unneeded star-power, this is an average, but productively played-out late-night comedy. 6/10
7/10
|
Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle
Storyline:
Four teenagers are sucked into a magical video game, and the only way they can escape is to work together to finish the game. While I have never been one to be a fan of complete remakes of films, especially when they were already done well to begin with, this is the one exception that is hilariously its own and tells the story with its own voice. Creating the same nostalgic feeling of the first film, this instead creates an original concept rather than a re-do. Amping up the technology to fit in today's standards, this innovative idea runs hand in hand with its amusing storytelling. Being aware of its absurdity paves the way for the ridiculousness to be fully absorbed into the audience. With an utterly unparalleled cast, they simply are fitting in their roles. Entertaining the audience with the performances of Jack Black as a teenage girl, Dwayne Johnson as a dweeby nerd, Kevin Hart as a tall, tough guy, and Karen Gillian as the brainiac, arguably, are some of the most spot-on performances within the past few years. Having everyone give their all, as obscure as it may be, each character is believably lifelike. Capturing the individuals and a quite wholesome theme amounts to a collective goal that delivers in all the right ways - Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle may rely on its household name to be seen, but its perfect cast, laughable satire, and a fun watch create an overly quotable and recommendable picture. 7/10
8/10
|
We're the Millers:
Storyline:
A veteran pot dealer creates a fake family as part of his plan to move a huge shipment of weed into the U.S. from Mexico. Easily entertaining the audience every chance it gets, We're the Millers delivers the essence of what a feel-good film should be. With an inventive take on a familiar concept, this adds humor and an off-centered theme to break up the rut of seemingly (on the surface) dull comedies. A fresh cast transforms this dry script into something to work with. While this is contributed to good storytelling, this sticks to its strong suit of having a variety of characters and their take on their imperfections. Although overly inappropriate in moments, these cracks and over exaggerations attribute to the quirky humor that separates this from others. Considering the few sparingly odd and off-putting scenes that were deliberately included, on a whole, not everything is cohesively on the same page. Yet with an effectively consistent tone, all the awkwardness and lifelike emotions portrayed make this overly fake reality feel realistic. Genuinely providing laugh-out-loud humor, this may be a critically average film but is hilariously amusing - which is the entire purpose of this genre. 6.5/10
8/10
|
The French Dispatch:
Storyline:
A love letter to journalists in a French city that brings to life a collection of stories published in "The French Dispatch Magazine". Encapsulating Wes Anderson’s craft, those who are not fans of his style simply will not enjoy the aesthetic. Instead, the open-mindedness that embraces the movement of loosely compacted complications can find a way to appreciate it, even with inconsistencies between features. Presenting numerous, individual stories, there is plenty of room for mistakes connecting it all. Though this falls off track within its first few tales, the narrative quickly redirects to show the importance of the seemingly minor details. Choosing stylistically distinctive features like a Fullscreen picture, selective black and white scenes, and a multilingual script is as cultural as it is notably creative. Though arguably, this is on the brink of too many ingredients for its own good. Barely odd and chaotic enough to be artsy, the quality should have held more weight than the quantity. Yet, the unequivocal truth is that the everyday film watcher would not find much enjoyment from this, as its praises, almost fully, come critically. Getting too caught up in creating what the "stereotypical cinematic picture" should look like, The French Dispatch forgets, above all else, that a film should be entertaining. 7.5/10
5/10
|
Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas:
Storyline:
An oddball journalist and his psychopathic lawyer travel to Las Vegas for a series of psychedelic escapades. Though setting the record straight, as I do not know the book this was based off and/or the style of the author's storytelling, I will say, for what it's worth, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas simply is not for everyone. Instantly, however, this invents a feeling like no other. Unambiguously telling it for what it is, there is no room for the gibberish filler that usually comes in stories such as this. Dispensing a vibe that uniquely changes in each portion of the story, this film truthfully puts you in the shoes of the drugs and nonsense that take place. Naturally providing the pace and personality of the protagonist, this film's best feature, arguably, is its spot-on narration. Leaving bits and pieces within the concerned and double-faced dialogue, the audience may get lost throughout the journey, but it is consistent. Feeling every part of the confusion, grit, and vicious side of drugs that normally are skimped out on, this, in every way showcases the unpleasantries just as much as it's satire. With all things considered, though, this heads in no direction, nor does its theme make it anything fiercely impactful. Having to try too hard to keep up, there is not enough drive for the audience to want to put in the effort of fully understanding. 5/10
5/10
|
Fletch:
Storyline:
Irwin M. "Fletch" Fletcher is a newspaper reporter being offered a large sum to off a cancerous millionaire, but is on the run, risking his job and finding clues when it's clear the man is healthy. Simply a fact films such as these are incomparable and one of a kind, this is a freshly executed random comedy. Honorably playing to its strong suits with obscure and off-the-wall comments, Fletch may be all over the place but is planned. If anything were to embody the vibe of Chevy Chase, it would be this. Never missing a beat, there is always a line to consider and a moment to question. With expectedly absurd humor, this still finds a way to catch the audience off guard. While the film itself strives off its leading star and a slapstick script, though it's not surprising, the number of plot holes and inconsistencies rack up. From a hilarious protagonist that's underdeveloped to an engaging conflict that has no drive, this may be worth the watch comedically but not critically. Being yet another addition to BAM! films that are good but not really good, Fletch has its quotable lines and memorable scenes among its imperfections. 5.5/10
7.5/10
|
Bowfinger:
Storyline:
When a desperate movie producer fails to get a major star for his bargain basement film, he decides to shoot the film secretly around him. While it's no secret Steve Martin and Eddie Murphy can deliver any screenplay and turn it into something at least watchable, Bowfinger is nothing further. Being the epitome of a 90s comedy, while there is room to enjoy bits and pieces, on a whole, there is nothing that stands out -- therefore producing a quite monotone and forgettable film. Although executed to the best of its ability, given what little substance it had, even a decently written comedic script can't carry an overall ordinary story. Having most of its humor miss the target, leaves the audience feeling more indifferent than anything. With all things considered, this gets two things right: a solidifying score and a great concept. From a wholesome 90s feeling to an upbeat watch, this may date itself in most of its humor, but can still find its way to entertain. While this is not my first choice to recommend, it's not un-recommendable, either. 6/10
6/10
|
Men at Work:
Storyline:
Two garbage men uncover a conspiracy involving illegal toxic waste dumping and decide to bring the whole operation down. Although this is the typical, poorly made 90s comedy, Men at Work rather thrives with its self-aware humor and dumb situations. With in-tune dialogue, there is more to this than just the quick one-liners (even though they're still funny). Instead, this has quite the in-between-the-lines type of deadpan comedy that's so self-referential, it's almost appreciable. Given this setup is weak and dull-minded, though it's purposeful, it's cheap, not tasteful. With no premise or development, there is a lack of everything needed for a decent plot. However, with pleasing storytelling and descriptive directing, this takes an otherwise flat production into something watchable. Getting a genuine laugh and providing a lighthearted, easygoing watch without fail, by no means will you be watching a good film, but you'll surely be entertained. Being easily rewatchable, they just don't make films like this anymore that are simply worth the watch. 4.5/10
7/10
|
Barb and Star Go to Vista Del Mar:
Storyline:
Lifelong friends Barb and Star embark on the adventure of a lifetime when they decide to leave their small Midwestern town for the first time - ever. By keeping an open mind and enjoying the off-the-wall, obscure type of SNL comedy, Barb and Star Go to Vista Del Mar is sure to please on an entertainment level. Although this tends to not make sense throughout the vast majority of this film, it collectively amounts to a unified feeling that is unmatched. Tastefully using humorous aspects correctly, they are not overplayed. Precisely dramatizing moments over others emphasizes the truly chaotic (in a creative way) screenplay. Effortlessly getting a laugh out of the audience, it's credited to the dry comedic timing. Lead by a genuine, amusing friendship between Kristin Wiig and Annie Mumolo, hands down carries this whimsical and out-there story to something watchable. Though it does not deserve multiple watches, it rather is chalked up to a worth the watch type of comedy. While it takes a certain mindset to like this film, it adds a different route to the stereotypical comedy that gets too repetitive to hold your interest. With its many hiccups and questionable moments, this is stupid but just stupid enough to enjoy. 5/10
6.5/10
|
Tango & Cash:
Storyline:
Framed by their ruthless arch-nemesis, a mismatched LAPD crime-fighting duo has to put their differences aside to even the score once and for all. Though made for nothing more than a poorly done 80s buddy cop film, Tango & Cash doesn't rise above what it was made to do, instead embraces its imperfections to create a self-aware good bad film. Delivering on a personifying soundtrack, the unmatched vibes this construct is one for the books. While this comes more as something to compliment the cheesy essence of the characters, as this score has one track that is played louder than anything on the screen, it adds to the never-gets-old type of feeling. Not to mention centering a story around two characters that have lifeless chemistry and a fabricated connection, it just feels like this was made for a paycheck. Nevertheless, even with a stereotypical and uncommitted antagonist, this has the expected turn of events that were presented entertainingly. Incorporating enough one-liners to deserve the time to be spoken of off-screen, this without a doubt is a useless and poorly created film, yet is capable of always being a rewatchable and enjoyable time killer. 4/10
7/10
|
Central Intelligence:
Storyline:
After reconnecting with an awkward pal from high school through Facebook, a mild-mannered accountant is lured into the world of international espionage. While this largely plays off the predictable subject matter that only gets views from its familiarized feeling, Central Intelligence surprisingly is worth the time, despite its flaws. Admittedly getting better throughout its screen time, this tests your patience within its first act. Truthfully portraying some of the worst performances in the beginning, this gets the ball rolling and develops a pace that is matched by the corny tone eventually. Regardless, the effortless connection between Kevin Hart and Dwayne Johnson keeps this afloat. Having natural and unforced chemistry brings the dumb humor full circle. Having an even balance of one-liners, overly dramatic action sequences, and pop-culture references, there is more than enough to keep you laughing -- even if it's stupid. Given there are more things done wrong than right within this film, it failing to show the potential of the people within, and is an overused, mainstream concept, that doesn't seem to matter when all you want is an easy laugh and undemanding watch. 5/10
7/10
|
Logan Lucky:
Storyline:
A family man, his one-armed brother, and their sister attempt to pull off a heist during a NASCAR race in North Carolina. Although similar to other things within the genre, Logan Lucky is a fresh representation of effectively blending crime, comedy, and a clever storyline. Easily rewatchable and overly recommendable, this thrives in its fun and engaging plot. Proving to be more than what first meets the eye, the development, and organization of details prominently keep an upbeat progression while coherently establishing an in-depth story. With strong screenwriting and impressive humor, the nonexplicit and dry comedy this provides is delivered admirably by the talented cast. Having fitting performances across the board, the feelings conveyed are without a doubt in between the lines, but powerful enough to notice upon the first watch. Evolving the plot points within its screen time, this film surprisingly keeps a level head, sticks to its strong suits, and creates a well-made, entertaining story for what it's worth. 7.5/10
8/10
|
Sorry to Bother You:
Storyline:
In an alternate present-day universe, telemarketer, Cassius Green discovers a magical key to success. Struggling to become anything but a mere discussion topic, Sorry to Bother You admittedly has its small and notable moments, but are over shined by the chaotic and unorganized presentation. Predominantly running by the unwavering dedication from LaKeith Standfield, his devoted performance makes this watchable. Faithfully carrying the film, the candidly raw emotion makes for an engrossing protagonist, even when the script was not. Considering this, the execution of it all was the downfall. Having a loyal lead performance, an intriguing idea that is a breath of fresh air within the genre, and cohesive cinematography that displays an effective feeling, there was nothing to piece all of it together. With each effective aspect clashing with the others, there is an empty void between acts. Scrambling to put everything together at the end of the story, there was no time management, as the things that needed more time were rushed, and more times than not, scenes were dragged on. Unfortunately, embellishing on a different concept made a cinematic picture but an odd and peculiar film that is hard to find enjoyable. 8/10
6/10
|
Thunder Force:
Storyline:
Two former childhood best friends come together to fight the supervillains that are threatening their city. Rooting from the most stereotypical commonplace for any poorly executed comedy, Thunder Force is simply a bad film. Failing to provide a spark to hold your attention, this is a script that is not worth laughing for. With a lack of effort from just about everyone involved, it is apparent that there was no attempt for something decent from the first few moments on screen. Telling the audience what to feel rather than giving any sort of substance, the entire film was nothing more than two flat and overused characters with no personality. Moreover, the vast majority of this is non-laughable. Having wooden jokes that were as scripted as their flat characters, the blank and empty feeling this provides gets more prominent throughout its screen time. Not to mention a plot that skipped the needed and important plot points from the last two acts and embellished on the rest, with no time management, this was incredibly drawn out and rushed. However, without Jason Bateman, this would be painful to watch. Stealing the show with his small but exceedingly humorous performance, it's not enough to make this a must-see but makes it watchable. Deserving a better plot, he is the silver lining to a mostly waste of time film. 2/10
3/10
|
Our Idiot Brother:
Storyline:
An easygoing, dimwitted, jobless guy, Ned, is released from jail and relies on his sisters to help him get back on his feet. Being the same type of humor as all Paul Rudd films but worse, this fails to execute the jokes effectively. Having the same foreseeable humor and guessable characters, this non-striking film is too simple-minded to be anything noticeable. Having an entire make-up of a plot surrounded by stereotypes and overly ridiculous cliches, they were neither presented well nor funny. The shortcoming in developing a tangible feeling results in a script and characters that have no significance. Therefore, losing the audience's attention halfway through and having no draw factor to reel you in. On top of that, the finale that was treated as a monumental, full circle turnaround was nothing more than a forced monologue that was unfitting to the storyline. Furthering the hodgepodge of characters and subplots, Our Idiot Brother has laughable moments that are overtaken by creating an entire plot over a flat character. 5/10
5/10
|
Fast Times at Ridgemont High:
Storyline:
Following high schoolers in a small town in California, their lives become complicated between work, school, relationships, and friends. Despite having a masterpiece of a character as Jeff Spicoli, I can't say Fast Times at Ridgemont High is anything more than a dumb, slapstick comedy of the 80s. Even by giving a few laughs here and there, the humor was not enough to forget about the non-existent storyline and the non-existent storyline was too prominent without an overwhelming hilarious script. However, the accurate representation of teens was portrayed authentically and realistically. Depicting struggles and conflicts that are easily relatable, this was more of a lifelike scenario than a film. That being said, while this was made to be diverting and amusing, which it was, there was no purpose, theme, relevance, or practicality. Jumping from one character to the next, each moment had no direction and was a hodgepodge of random scenes. Regardless of my differences with the plot, given the time this was made, this succeeds in what it was going for - dumb entertainment value. Sean Penn delivers a performance that is worth the watch by itself and there are enough stupid, corny one-liners to keep you watching throughout its screen time. 5/10
7/10
|
Superbad:
Storyline:
Two co-dependent best friends navigate their last two weeks of high school by going to a party before going to different colleges. Truthfully being a comedic masterpiece, not only is Superbad extremely quotable, but it's legitimately funny from start to finish. Though more on the raunchy side of comedy, this never skips a beat in providing an effortless laugh and an enjoyable, intriguing story. Capturing a specific vibe with the time frame and relationships, the on-screen chemistry and script intertwine trouble-free. Every character and line creates an unmatched, quality mood that differentiates itself from others within the genre. Blending the opening credits into the film was as graceful as it was stylistic. Being personal, coordinated, and setting the mood that the rest of the film follows, the energy this creates is creative, comical, and unique. While all in all this is a ridiculous comedy that's made for a laugh, the heart of the story takes an active part in providing a wholesome, lighthearted watch. Despite becoming slightly corny and cliche, this originates a solid plot, worthy character development, and provides a genuine laugh throughout the way. 7/10
8/10
|
17 Again:
Storyline:
Mike O'Donnell regrets his decisions as a high schooler now that he's older. Getting a chance to re-do his life, he turns back to being 17 to right his wrongs. Even though this is an overly guessable and quite cheesy story, this succeeds in what it was made for - a feel-good watch that's easily rewatchable. Given that this goes further than just the average suspension of disbelief, the set-up of the film was not only rushed but executed poorly. While it's easy to piece two and two together, the plot was shaky and relied on the comedic timing of the dialogue and star power to keep it rolling rather than good screenwriting. The casting, however, was significantly the showrunner. Although not talked as highly as it should, this is one of Zac Efron's better roles. Being personable, dorky, and portraying an authentic individual, he's the stabilizing factor that keeps this film grounded. Considering this wasn't made to be much more than a decent laugh, the typical characters, few funny moments, and overly conventional storyline add up to the critical issues, but not the level of entertainment this provides. 17 Again may be a rudimentary and non-original film but achieves its goal by being funny enough to keep watching and not dumb enough to turn off. 5/10
6.5/10
|
Mr. Deeds:
Storyline:
Longfellow Deeds lives in a small town and owns a local business. When a long lost relative leaves him 40 billion dollars along with the largest media company, he has to decide what to do with it. Considering who you're dealing with, out of all Adam Sandler films, new and old, this is always an easy watch and can get a laugh. However, I'm not saying this is anything spectacular, rather a good time passer that is just stupid enough to be a rewatchable comedy. This is adequately funny, keeping you held up throughout the entire thing, if you let yourself, you'll find more times than not are worth a chuckle, even if this isn't wildly funny. Besides, a cheesy life lesson can always be to one's liking. Stating the obvious, the awful character portrayals and an even worse execution of their development are prominent. Being foreseeable, overly cheesy, and of course, an unsurprising ending only adds to the fact that this was a plot not made with any care in the world. Yet, when push comes to shove I still have seen this film more than once and still find myself laughing throughout. Sometimes, there's not much to say with films like these. You know what you’re in for with Sandler, and while this is nowhere near his best, it’s nowhere near his worst; Mr. Deeds isn’t a must see by any means, but you’ll catch yourself enjoying it if you come across it. 3/10
5.5/10
|
Paul Blart: Mall Cop
Storyline:
A security guard at a mall, who takes his job very seriously, has his time to shine when a group is robbing the mall/taking hostages. Though this film is unavoidably stupid and meant to be that way, Paul Blart: Mall Cop gets hated on by critics too aggressively. By no means is this an Oscar-worthy/acclaimed film, yet it is incredibly funny, quick on its feet, and effectively tells a story. With the looks of this, it seems like just another Kevin James and Adam Sandler type of film. While that may reign true, only to an extent, James provides a likable and relatable protagonist that creates his world within the screentime. Admittedly, this adds more over-the-top falls, wipe-outs, and dumb aspects like that than what was needed to be funny, yet I wouldn't expect anything less. Having it's a fair share of cringy and random moments within, many aspects were created for a laugh rather than a cohesive storyline. However, this is incredibly memorable, as it can get a laugh out of anyone watching and easily creates a humorous vibe. After watching, you'll never be able to look at a pixie stick or hello kitty bandaids the same, or hear Detroit Rock City without thinking of this. 4/10
6.5/10
|
Easy A:
Storyline:
When lying to her best friend about the details of her weekend, rumors quickly spread about Olive making her well known but for the wrong reasons. Certainly, this is a simply funny teen comedy that was made with actual care. Having the film take a smooth course from the effortless performance from its protagonist, Emma Stone makes this film what it is entirely. Becoming relatable, dorky, and sassy, this is a seasoned concept but gets the job done; not to mention, the stupid, but effective dumb one-liners from her parents that will undeniably get a laugh. Apart from the entertainment value that comes with this, the monologue was off-putting. Each time she addressed the camera, it discouraged the authenticity that the rest of the plot worked hard to enforce. While this might not have been as unappealing if it weren't edited/thrown in at times that didn't correlate, either way, it wasn't presented in a fashion I'd deem decent. At the end of the day, Easy A is a great time passer that can get a genuine laugh, satisfy the slightly hopeless romantics out there, a few scenes that give second-hand embarrassment, but most of all, a watchable comedy. 7/10
7/10
|
The Kid Detective:
Storyline:
A down-on-his-luck private detective helps a girl to solve the mysterious murder of her boyfriend. Truthfully taking this film into perspective, while it has problems, it carries through with a strange idea and a quite shocking intricate plot, that just works. Adam Brody delivers a perfectly constructed, offbeat protagonist. Providing a performance that was sharp and lifelike, the numerous aspects that were incredibly odd and off-putting within the story, he makes it worthwhile. Being extremely authentic, this genuine and humorous performance carries the film. With a script that feels rather weird and not well thought out, it both clicks and is its defeat. Consisting of dry and emotionless delivery for the majority of the film is consistent, and can get a laugh out of the right person. However, the randomness of this element would have been fine if it were integrated correctly, as the feeling from the story was long and didn't give the viewer enough content throughout to make it an attention keeper. The Kid Detective has more of a complex plot than what meets the eye and executes from its alternative makeup. While it takes a different mindset to enjoy this dry and not-so-attention-orientated film, this is an unorthodox comedy that is a breath of fresh air for the everyday movie watcher. 7/10
7.5/10
|
Game Night:
Storyline:
A regular game night among friends is kicked up a notch when it turns into a real-life murder mystery case and not a game. This film consists of a great story that's quite original. Being quick on its feet with simple, but effective humor, this is easy to entertain and an effortless watch. Casting thoroughly precise leads with chemistry that can't be faked, the performances were not matched across the board; having the implementation of poor supporting characters makes for the rest of the cast to be flat. However, the amusement that comes from them isn't undermined, rather not lived to their full potential. Becoming overly cheesy with the ending, it loses some of the creative points this had once before. Having numerous times it could have ended, stringing it along misses out on the effectiveness that could have come with a strong finale. While the film on a whole consists of dumb circumstances, you have to take this for what it's worth. Being just like everything else in the genre, Game Night shouldn't be treated as the most outstanding option but is worth the time. 6/10
7/10
|
Safety Not Guaranteed:
Storyline:
An intern befriends a guy she is helping write a story about who is taking a trip to travel back in time. Taking this for what it’s worth, it's definitely an acquired taste that takes a certain person to enjoy it. Being incredibly unconventional, this quirky and not so typical comedy has many bumps along the way but makes up for it by being unique. The pure originality and not care for the typical route of a film is what this has going for it. Taking one idea at a time, the messy and chaotic organization of details was done skillfully, which held your attention for the entire film. However, the negatives are more substantial, and, overpowering - the subplots. Getting carried away and driving the film away from what it was leading up to, the central idea got lost amongst the rest of the confusing subject matter. By no longer having any significance, everything within the film was neither put together cohesively and/or had any relevance. All in all, Safety Not Guaranteed has clever concepts and a nontraditional route that works, but the overwhelming lack of planning the story overtakes the unique characteristics this brings to the table; this is not a must-see, yet is entertaining for those who want something unusual. 5/10
6/10
|
Better Off Dead:
Storyline:
Lane is a teenager that is obsessed with his girlfriend. When she dumps him for a new guy, after multiple attempts at suicide, Lane challenges her new boyfriend to race the deathly ski slope. Although difficult to put into words exactly what you would classify this film and/or what you are getting yourself into by watching, this entertains in not the typical ways. Consisting of an offbeat protagonist, a plot that doesn't have a care in the world for logic, and just an overall feel-good story, Better Off Dead is a light watch that puts a different spin on the stereotypical 80s comedy. Quite interesting opening credits of real-life objects turning into animation makes for the tie in of this aspect more systematic, yet is oddly placed throughout the story. Considering the idea that this was going for, it's creative but lacks in execution. The issue is not the outdated technology, even if it’s extremely outdated, rather no integration of this aspect was planned and created a halt in the flow when it was present (which was a lot). All in all, you have to take this for what it’s worth - a low grade and low budget film made in the 80s - and with that in mind, this is the perfect imperfect quirky, and corny story to watch at any time. 4/10
6.5/10
|
Spy:
Storyline:
Despite having stellar field training, CIA analyst Susan Cooper works a desk job, until her lead agent is assassinated and she goes undercover to avenge his death. Despite looking dull and an overused concept upon first glance, this film has much more than what meets the eye. Being much more than a comical spoof, this is extremely funny, quick on its feet, and above all else, quite original. Although predictable, given it was done on purpose, this is unbelievably compelling. Never having a dull moment, both the comedy and action were blended perfectly to create a balanced story. The performances from everyone individually are possibly some of their best. Created and executed meticulously, the dedication that came from all makes this what it was. That being said, Jason Statham was extremely hilarious and showcases a different side of him that doesn't always get highlighted, as he's easily the best part of this film. Spy is not only a spoof but a comedy with high packed action that is 100% worthy of the watch, both entertainment and critically. Even with a few over-the-top, expected scenes, this is watchable for anyone wanting a good time. 7.5/10
7.5/10
|
Let's Be Cops:
Storyline:
Two best friends get mistaken for cops in costumes for a party, but find that they get more respect as cops and continue the charade. Although not the best film critically, Let's Be Cops is truly a perfect BAM! watch when you're wanting something that is easily a mood changer and lighthearted. With quick witty lines, this is a dumb concept that works for what it's made out to be. This buddy-cop chemistry is truly unmatched. Although I'll admit my bias as these two are in New Girl/this being New Girl humor, that still doesn't change the factors that make this incredibly laughable. Yet, the progression is definitely blocky and doesn't quite make sense at all times. The number of holes and issues that come along with this care-free story are numerous and obvious, however, add to another aspect of how watchable this is. Overall, this is worth the watch for the times when you want something nice and easy. Changing up the consistent vibe from most comedies, this is stupid, but stupid in a good way. 4/10
7/10
|
Kiss Kiss Bang Bang:
Storyline:
A criminal turned actor gets entangled into solving a murder case with his childhood sweetheart and a private investigator. This is the definition of an underrated, fresh film that changes the usual routine of films in Hollywood. Featuring purely funny lines, a clever cast and an overall, well-produced film, this story has a few hiccups, but is original. While the opening credits created a vibe that was fitting within the story and prepared you for an intriguing watch, the opening 20 minutes was not grasping. Losing my interest, it was a rocky beginning; however, once it picked up, there was never a time I wasn't laughing out loud or in tune with the plot. Though seemingly predictable, this storyline has more to it than what meets the eye. Coiled with dark humor, this parody still puts across its mature, central message, while providing a laugh and a poke at the cinema in the meantime. Casting utterly superb leads, their anti-companionship had a chemistry that was spotless. Keeping the movement of the upbeat flow, this kept it going. While the only negative I have to offer is the personable narrating became too overwhelming at times, in addition to the cheesy ending, it was done for a reason - to which I understand, I just wish it could have done something different. That being said, this is still an innovative and refreshed film that deserves more love. 7.5/10
8.5/10
|
LATEST
ALL (click to expand)
ALL (click to expand)
The Blues Brothers:
Storyline:
As soon as Jake is released from prison, he reunites with his brother, Elwood. The first thing they do is get their band back together, who are known as the Blues Brothers. This film was truly ahead of its time, as it is just a solid, well-grounded story. Driven by convincing lead performances, there was never a moment that didn't keep you on your toes. The stunts, regarding the car chase, are anticipating and incredibly realistic. While these were filmed and produced hands-on with no effects, that makes them even cooler. While the car chases consist of a good portion of the film, it is coherent to the flow and keeps the adrenaline up. Starting from the very first scene, the vibe that is transferred through the audience is unmatched. Achieving a wordless feeling throughout the entire story is never compromised and acts as the stable means this plot relies on; The Blues Brothers just has that feel that is unlike anything else. John Belushi and Dan Aykroyd are completely fitting and are never questionable. Their vocals, choreography and deliverance of lines are not only incredibly hilarious but make for a credible film that will always be watchable. 8/10
8/10
|
Kindergarten Cop:
Storyline:
An undercover cop finds himself in a tricky situation when he has to pose as a kindergarten teacher in order to take down one of the biggest drug lords. This is a film I love to see from the classic 90s era - they all have the same predictable story, same famous actors, and cheesy one-liners, but you still watch them anyway. Trying to please everyone from every genre, this went for a comedy, action, and romance all in one. Doing that successfully is one thing compared to just doing it, where its safe to assume this just included these aspects. Taking into account that this was simply made to be what it is, sometimes it's hard not to be critical because of all the plot holes this includes. With these plot holes come the usual sub-plots and overall foreseeable turn of events. The expected (but still true to Arnie's reputation) one-liners will always be comical but doesn't help the failing plot. While it's easy to point out the negatives within this film, that's me being critical. The real positive of this film is that it's a great BAM! entertainment story to pass the time. 5/10
7/10
|
Starksy & Hutch:
Storyline:
A high-strung workaholic and a ladies' man are detectives that end up being partners. The unlikely two work a case to take down one of the biggest drugs deals. While I am not familiar with the show this was based on, it doesn't matter one way or another, as this film is just made for a good time. With plenty of holes within the storyline, a lack of development and a script of purely one-liners, this has its issues, but still manages to be super funny and provide some adrenaline-pumping car chases. Though the cast is all A-listers, this was not as great as it could have been considering the talent present. Being judgmental, yes, this is a light-hearted, dumb comedy, yet it just doesn't get that pure and genuine laughter, which is why it's nothing too spectacular. Because of this, this film falls into a place, among many other comedies, that are rudimentary. Lastly, while I think this deserves to be said, Snoop Dogg definitely surprised me with his quick and lively performance. While everyone, including him, was nothing substantial, and across the board very average, he came as a pleasant shock. 6/10
6/10
|
50 First Dates:
Storyline:
Romancer, Henry sets out on a girl named Lucy, who doesn't remember him every morning, as she has short-term memory loss. Though a typical story for a Rom-Com, Adam Sandler and Drew Barrymore's unconventional chemistry carries it along. Having the same feel as other things within the genre, this may not be big picture creative but adds a nice spin onto your everyday film. The casting and creation of both the main and supporting characters are all around great. Being comedic and relevant, everyone served a purpose at some point and were there to lighten the mood. As repetitive as this got, it never became boring. While this has a foreseeable ending from the very first scene, the course of getting there was amusing. You won't die of laughter (by any means), but you'll catch yourself snickering here and there. This was made to be a simple story and everyone knew that while making it. It has it's sweet moments, and in turn, it's very stupid ones. Having a great balance between romance and comedy, this makes for a comforting love story that you can watch at any time. 5/10
6/10
|
Just Go With It:
Storyline:
A plastic surgeon recruits his assistant as his soon-to-be ex-wife to help impress the girl of his dreams and win her over. Going off the bar that is set from all of his films, this 100% deserves to be thrown into the category of Adam Sandler films that are very entertaining for everyone, yet not special enough to be classified as a must-see. I hate to judge a film by its cover, but here I am - just looking at this, you know already there isn't much hope from the get-go. While this has a tone that carries the entire film smoothly, what makes up this story is impractical to a new degree. Consisting of the fair share of cheesy scenes, the plot itself is neglected and clearly shows. Admittedly, this got a few genuine laughs out of me and never lost my interest throughout. However, this is something you have to be in the mood for, as at any given time I wouldn't take the time to watch this or re-watch it. As I find myself saying this same thing about most Sandler films, I still end up watching them. Yet, this succeeds in providing a fast-moving story that's enjoyable one way or another. 4/10
5/10
|
Grown Ups:
Storyline:
Five childhood friends reunite at their former basketball coach funeral. Though Adam Sandler gets a bad rap as far as making some bad films, this is one of those, but it still is a classic feel-good story. Providing an easy watch, this is sure to get a laugh out of everyone at some point. The script consists of one-liners that are as stupid as they are predictable. Though not all of them are hits, the good overweighs the bad. Because the majority of this is so dumb you have to watch, that alone will be able to make you smile. The music choices were classic songs that fit the time and era they were going for but were thrown in at such awful times it kind of ruined it. But overall, that is the vibe of this story. Nothing is produced with care, instead it's for enjoyment. So, taking it for what it's worth, this isn't critically acclaimed but is worth the watch. As are most of these actors' films, Grown Ups is a guilty pleasure that you hate to enjoy. 5/10
7/10
|
Mr. Right:
Storyline:
Martha is felt stuck when she finds out her new boyfriend is a professional assassin who kills the people that hire him instead of their intended targets. Though I don't hate Anna Kendrick as much as I hate Ben Affleck, I still really dislike her. While that contributes to me disliking this film, I think it evens out as I like Sam Rockwell and Tim Roth. With all these biases in mind, this film made up some of the worst performances I've seen in a film all around. Consisting of an entirely predictable make-up, the storyline was doomed from the start. Having absolutely no sense of originality isn't necessarily a bad thing if its at least entertaining, but it failed to do even that simple thing. The fighting choreography was only slightly enjoyable because of how poorly it was made. Having Rockwell's signature move as a little dance number would have been interesting if it wasn't so obvious it was a double. The same thing goes for the action if it weren't so rigid and roughly edited together, the flow of scenes would have made a more cohesive feeling. Sadly, this is a good majority of films made within the genre now. They're quickly created, produced, and thrown together that make for a rough ride all around that can't even produce an entertaining film. 3/10
3/10
|
Eurovision Song Contest: The Story of Fire Saga
Storyline:
Two small-town friends take on their dreams of being pop stars at the Eurovision Contest until they realize they might be in over their heads. Will Ferrell making this film is not surprising in the least, as he hasn't made a good film since 2010. Yet, Rachel McAdams agreeing to this will forever be my question why she stooped so low. Though I don't think anyone can create a film as bad as Holmes & Watson, and thankfully this wasn't on that level, this still was awful. Having a terrible plot, rocky progression, and dull character portrayals, possibly the only steady piece of this was their consistent accents. The soundtrack was average - and both what I was and wasn't expecting. Ferrell, doing his singing comes with no shock, as (I think) it is quite comical. However, McAdams half-singing/blended in with a professional singer was so obvious to the point where it was distracting, as it was so apparent. All in all, not that I had high hopes for this, but I still came out disappointed. This wasn't in the works to be anything worth talking about by any means, but had the opportunity to provide a good laugh and easy watch, and didn't even succeed on that entertainment standpoint. 3/10
1/10
|
Suburban Gothic:
Storyline:
A broke, awkward guy who talks to the dead teams up with the local bartender to find the ghost that has been terrorizing their town. Coming from someone who truly only watched this because of Matthew Gray Gubler, I barely made it through, as it was genuinely terrible. Having very little that was decent throughout this film, there's just about nothing nice I can say. After a lot of after-thought from this film, the only positive I can come to is its downfall; it fails in its execution, as it originally (well before getting on screen) has clever content, but poor delivery. There is no attention grab or factor to draw you into the story to where you can relate to any character or instance. The high strong personality of every character causes the amount of stuff going on impossible to wrap your head around. Jumping from one character to the next, to the next with no development or any aspects to back anything up is substantial. This, paired with stiff and dull acting, I don't know how there was any thought that this could have a good outcome. While I admit that this is a smaller film that came out a while ago, there isn't much traffic toward this film as it is. Yet, that combined with this review should stop everyone from wasting their time on this, as it is a long hour and a half I will never get back. 2/10
1/10
|
My Spy: |
Storyline:
Sophie, a nine year-old busts CIA agent, JJ when he is surveilling them. In order for her not to blow his cover, he teaches her how to become a spy. This film was exactly how I expected it be with no question about it. Consisting of a dull and poor performance from an actor who can’t act (Dave Bautista) as the protagonist and a script filled with the most predictable and foreseeable actions, no wonder the "best" parts were thrown into the trailer. While I try to go in with an open mind and take things for what they are worth, I'll admit this wasn't unwatchable. Despite the awkward chemistry between literally every character within the story, incidentally, I laughed at a few things here and there and it did hold my attention. This is not a must see by any means and you can do plenty of other things with your time, as this is the basic and stereotypical re-use of storylines within Hollywood. To top it all off, the most disappointing part about this film is that even with Ken Jeong, his few moments were not even slightly laughable. This is a pure waste of talent and truly goes to show how if you can't even make one of the funniest comedians funny, how are you supposed to make the rest of the film funny? 3/10
4/10
|
Tootsie:
Storyline:
Perfectionist actor, Michael Dorsey is too difficult to work with that he can't get a job. He reinvents himself (disguised as a woman) to play a part in a soap opera. This film truthfully was ahead of its time. Though social terms were different in the 80s, this film still works in today's day and age. It provides a story of self-worth, reinventing, and a light-hearted tale of a struggling protagonist. The feeling of this being incredibly corny and cringy is inevitable. Although the makeup of this idea is well thought out, the way of doing so has the typical 80s cheesy comedy vibe. This doesn't halt the flow of the film by any means, rather it just adds that extra layer of non-practicality. The ending, as predictable as it may be, was not the sole reason why it was disappointing. The reason instead is of how rushed and jumbled it became. The plot on a whole was developing at its own pace and wasn't the main focus of the film, however, it was still a major portion of the story. The finale raced through this developmental arc too quickly causing it not to be as substantial as it could have been. Overall, out of all comedies, this is something that just has to be seen out of appreciation. It may not be the most solid and wholesome thing out there, but it does provide an easy watch that is a positive mood changer. 6.5/10
7.5/10
|
Ace Ventura: Pet Detective
Storyline:
A private investigator who specializes in pets is hired to find the missing mascot for the Miami Dolphins before their next game. Jim Carrey is hands down 100% the star of the show and carries this film entirely. Though this features his same old dumb humor with his typical facial expressions and him going off the rails, it was done right in this. It was not forced and flowed effortlessly. Besides maybe 2-4 over-the-top scenes - which is to be expected - the entire film I could not stop laughing. The creation of this film was just a spotlight to highlight Carrey's craziness and what he has the power to do, which works completely. This plays into what it has, which is the dumb humor, and acts just how you would figure. Especially in comedies, critics can be very harsh when it comes to a film such as this. As unfair as this may be, you have to take this for what it is and not compare this to anything else, as this is not what it was made for. This is made to have a great laugh and put a smile on your face, which is exactly what it provides. While dumb humor like this may not be in everyone's wheelhouse, this is a priceless and entertaining watch for people who love this genre. Ace Venture: Pet Detective is sure to give a laugh and provides many iconic scenes. 6/10
8/10
|
The Wrong Missy:
Storyline:
When Tim Morris thinks he is inviting the woman of his dreams to a work vacation, a horrific blind date with the same name comes instead. Genuinely, if the only thing one takes away from this review is that no one ever needs to see this film, then I have achieved. This 100% did not need to be made. It would be quicker to discuss the positives, as the list of negatives is too long to count, however, the lists of positives are pretty sad. Being incredibly stupid, this plot had no hope from the get-go. Starting dull, consisting of dry interactions and forced humor, this fails to bring a smile to the viewer's face. The awkwardness between the leads was there on purpose but didn't root from dumb humor, it rooted from a lack of chemistry and unnatural characters. A film such as this honestly makes you appreciate the terrible dumb comedies of Adam Sandler (the bad ones). The absolute lack of consideration for even setting the story in a personable way or possibly creating an effortless vibe is truly unmatched. This story makes you remember why Netflix films are categorized in the stereotype of creating poor films. At least I could make it through this film without having to turn it off, but that didn't stop me from struggling throughout that journey. The rare times I laughed were out of uncomfortableness or an occasional one-liner. Make sure to not watch this film because it is not worth the time! Rating: 3/10 |
68 Kill:
Storyline:
Chip has a problem saying no to beautiful women. When his girlfriend recruits him to do a hit job with him, things take a turn for the worse. I acknowledge and will be the first to admit that this has numerous and plenty of issues. Varying from plot holes to useless characters and pointless scenes, this film may not be all there with its productional aspects but makes up for it with its quirky humor. Starting with a rough and troubling first act, this failed to grasp the attention it was going for. Although this was made to "set the story", the entire make up of this story was based on little information and for a good time, so virtually this was as pointless as it was not-appealing. Once it hit the second act though, the gears started moving. Matthew Gray Gubler rocked it and was completely and utterly hilarious. Everything he did was humorous and achieved the personal, comedic standpoint that most comedies miss. Being incredibly short and just an easy, laid back watch, this film can put the viewer in a good mood. Running on elements that will keep you on your toes, having a not surprising but satisfying ending, and most of all, taking a step away from the formal film stereotype, this film isn't perfect but goes with it. Rating: 6.5/10 |
Free Fire:
Storyline:
When a black-market arms deal goes wrong, two gangs are stuck in a warehouse fighting for their lives. This film is not one I would go out of my way to recommend to everyone, however, if you're like me and are sick of the same old films with similar outcomes, this is a different comedy to switch it up. The first act was dreadfully slow. While it stands for something and is there for developmental purposes, it could have been done more tastefully, as it was incredibly prolonged. Once you get over that step, though, it changes for the better. Centering around a cheesy 70s theme, the humor was funny in a forced and cheesy manner. Although I enjoyed this and was laughing at plenty of things throughout the film, I hate the overly forced down your throat jokes, to which this had a few of. That being said, it is still a distinguished type of humor that knows its place within the story. The cast provided a specific skillset to the film that features widely adapted personalities to add to the personable characters. Everyone provided their part, whether big or small and was meaningful to the story. This might have had a few hiccups throughout its course, but its imperfectness is a symbol of its story. Rating: 6.5/10 |
The Nice Guys:
Storyline:
A private investigator and a man who gets paid to hurt people have to work together to protect a young woman, Amelia. When some dangerous people are looking for her as well, they get involved in a tricky case. This film is a fun and unique concept that really hasn't been done so successfully. Casting brilliant actors, is incredibly funny and including a perfect soundtrack; this film succeeds in providing an intriguing storyline without skimping on its humor. Ryan Gosling honestly was show-stopping. Not only did he provide an excellent character, but he has depth that compliments Russell Crowe. Embracing the humorous persona of such a character, he did it so effortlessly and was truly the star of the film. The soundtrack was flawlessly composed. Fitting the time frame and summing it up was great, along with just simply creating a combination that works. Every component works with the next and creates an easy flow. Almost every scene has laugh out loud humor. Though some things can get slightly cheesy, that is one of the underlying factors that is known by its creators and rolls with it. The action goes along with this to add just the right amount of suspense to the comedic characteristics. Rating: 8/10 |
Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby
Storyline:
Ricky Bobby, a beloved NASCAR star is at the top of his game until a French driver knocks him off his pedestal. With the help of his father, he makes a comeback. This film is another awesome combo from Will Ferrell and John C. Reilly that was needed in the world. Although this might lack in the majority of productional aspects, it doesn't stop this from providing a stellar comedy. The one-liners honestly get me every time. Not only are they incredibly risky and would by no means make it in today's standards, but they are so graceful in doing so. While they are mostly stupid, that is the theme of this film and it succeeded in making the audience laugh. It is so over the top and cheesy that it becomes more realistic. By having an effortless watch, it comes with this being overly dumb and no grit. The numerous plot holes come into play frequently and question the screenwriting. Although the dialogue was spot on, more time could have gone into the development and planning of characters. While this film also features a few useless characters and some continuity issues, this is still an absolute must-see for everyone. Though it is not the best Ferrell film, it is undeniably iconic and has many quotable lines. Rating: 7/10 |
Ferris Bueller's Day Off:
Storyline:
Determined to have one last day off, high school senior Ferris Bueller skips class with his best friend and girlfriend. This is an innovative comedy within the film world that is without a doubt a classic. Moving at a fun pace, featuring relatable aspects, and is a laid back, engaging film. Easily, this is re-watchable on so many levels. Always providing the same amount of energy and entertainment as the first watch. Including numerous absorbing scenes, each is progressed to the next with a care-free vibe. This doesn't focus on heavy life aspects but still provides a positive life message. Incorporating these real-life and relatable characteristics, it does so in a comedic way. Rooting from a corny, but quite laughable script, it's lighthearted and isn't mainstreamed about it. With this being a classic, the many quotable lines and famous scenes are hyped up for a reason. Having many perfectly composed shots heightens the personable feeling this film brings. The individualized directing and editing depicts this firsthand mood/relationship with the audience. This is a film everyone needs to see at some point in their life. Providing many relatable moments, an effortless flow and is incredibly funny. Rating: 7.5/10 |
The Other Guys:
Storyline:
Two desk-bound detectives investigate a minor case that turns into something bigger than they expected. This plot is nothing new and provides the same excess amount of pointless things from Will Ferrell. Yet this clicks and undeniably is an entertaining watch, as it puts its own distinctive comedic twist to it. The one-liners and script were incredibly funny. While they were placed every chance they could get, they were at the right times and definitely gets a laugh from the audience at some point throughout. The narrating, however, was just not cutting it. It was meant to be a stable piece to rely on, but it was only a distractor from the plot (even though it wasn't much). Coming in at times it shouldn't have and creating just a blocky flow. As far as the plot needing some work, there also were a few pointless scenes seemingly thrown in to help the progression. While it doesn't halt the flow of the film, it just becomes noticeable when everything isn't as relevant. All in all, this film is incredibly intriguing and is an easy watch. Kicking off with an anticipating opening (that is really extreme for no reason), this won't disappoint in making you laugh. Rating: 6.5/10 |
Wedding Crashers:
Storyline:
John and Jeremy are two friends who enjoy crashing weddings and meeting women. Everything goes to plan until one of them falls for one of the bridesmaids. As far as comedies go, they normally are all the same being predictable with dull, expected lines. While this might rain true as far as being predictable, it did so by never missing a beat and always on its game with its script. Hitting one joke after another, this is a classic for all comedy lovers. Owen Wilson and Vince Vaughn's chemistry clearly shows in everything they do, including this. Piecing a holey script into laugh-out-humor and purposely uncomfortable moments, they made the film into what it is. However, their chemistry can only go so far until the actual plot has to stand by itself. Running out of substance mid-way throughout the film caused the still hilarious humor to not be as effective as there was nothing to support it. Rationally speaking though, this wasn't made for the stellar plot so it didn't halt the flow of the film. Having a truly creative storyline and perfect casting, this film offers a light and easy watch that can entertain anyone. Despite a few bumps in the road, this is well worth the time. Rating: 7/10 |
Big:
Storyline:
When a wish turns a 12-year-old boy, Joshua Baskin, into a 30-year-old man, his life takes an unexpected turn. This candidly is entertaining and clever. It has an upbeat feeling that keeps the audience on their toes with a laughable story. This is incredibly hilarious and filled with laugh out loud jokes/scenes. The build of the event paired with the effortless mannerisms of the cast, the tone creates a light-hearted and juvenile feeling that is easy for anyone to relate. This wouldn't have been what it is without the great performance from Tom Hanks. Though his character (and whole film) was very cheesy, it didn’t disrupt the film, as Hanks took it for what it was and turned it into something personable. My only negative is that it could have been more creative with the ending, as everything was very mainstream/predictable. Taking into account the time this was made and its entire concept, it's understandable. That being said, it only adds to the imperfect, cheesy factor this brings to the table, which provides an engaging watch from start to finish. Rating: 7/10 |
Jumanji: The Next Level
Storyline:
After Spencer goes back into the game of Jumanji, his friends follow him in order to bring him home, except this time, there is even more danger than before. Consisting of a "development" in the beginning and end of the film, it felt incredibly forced to have that added In. The acting was awkward and uncomfortable (for the real-life characters), which made for a blocky cut from the real world to the game. Having the characters change avatars from the film before was very upsetting as no one truly fit their characters anymore. Yes, it was still entertaining and held my interest until the end, but it just felt unnatural. The humor was downgraded a bunch. While it still found a way to make me laugh, it was dumb humor that wasn't truly funny, as all the jokes were targeted for a quick laugh, instead of something you would want to tell others about. The only person who had a few lines that were decent enough to praise was Jack Black. He does nothing but crack lines for a reaction, but it works every time. Following from something that was stupid but incredibly funny, it was very disappointing having this follow, as it was not as funny, consisted of a drawn out plot and tried to force something that doesn't fit within this story. Rating: 4/10 |
Stuber:
Storyline:
A tough cop who is recovering from eye surgery recruits a shy Uber driver to help him catch the drug dealer who murdered his partner. It's genuinely hard for me to write a review on this film because of how bad it was. When almost every aspect was terrible, there's close to nothing to discuss because it will all be negative, but here is a snippet of what I thought. The synopsis spoils the whole film- a rough cop who has nothing going for him anymore because of a tragic event ends up being paired with a shy driver who has no life and is stuck in his own head. The two opposite personalities MIRACULOUSLY end up bonding and create a great pair, that's it, the end. This film was summed up in its two minute trailer but was dragged out into a two hour film. Someone needs to say it, Dave Bautista can't act, he just can't and he should stop. He plays the same, one depth personality character in every film, which never results in anyone wanting another out of him, yet he's still going. Though the other aspects in this film I have been harsh toward, the one thing that wasn't completely terrible were the jokes. While the majority were dumb one liners, they were placed in correct times to get a laugh from the audience. Rating: 3/10 |
Booksmart:
Storyline:
Amy and Molly are academic overachievers who have had no fun in high school. The night before graduation, they decide they want one last night to party. Having strong lead performances in the beginning of the film, its direction and tone started to lose itself throughout its take. Instead of sticking to the stellar friendship, it started to get out of hand and focus more on feminism qualities which became too distracting to have a good time. Ideas were being thrown left and right and truly took away from its enjoyability. The main characters chemistry shined through this somewhat shaky plot. While its comedic aspects did not disappoint, its stable storyline did. Having numerous subplots that were never later developed started to become noticeable. But the friendship and jokes that were shown was enough to keep the energy up. I liked the message that was behind the story as well. While it showed the ups and downs of many different high school kids, it created a personal connection for people who can relate to at least one character in the film. That being said, I wish this purpose was continued until the end, as its tone shifted from the simple connection to issues that felt forced with this plot. Taking into account this film was made for the time today, I don't think it will become a timeless film. Because the social atmosphere is wrapped in a bubble with the modern times today, it doesn't make it bad. It was entertaining and something different. Rating: 6.5/10 |
Get Smart:
Storyline:
Maxwell Smart is a newly promoted field agent who is tasked with what is thought to be a simple job. It soon becomes more difficult as the simple threat turns into a terrorist attack. A seriously stupid comedy which never fails to make me laugh. Plenty of aspects are missing as far as the storyline goes, but the clever humor makes up for it as it's truly entertaining. The cast was played well. While all the characters were flat and just touched upon the surface, that's what made it enjoyable. You really knew nothing about them besides what was clearly predictable, so their performances were satisfying because the plot wasn't strongly developed, so there was no room to mess up. The ending was cheesy, but expected. There was nothing out of the ordinary and it was incredibly predictable, but again, it was satisfying. The characters did what was expected of them and it fit within the ongoing story. Wanting an easy watch and a feel-good film, this is definitely worth the time. I would be lying if I said there aren't better things out there, but it's still worth the time and will make you laugh. Rating: 5/10 |
The Replacements:
Storyline:
Late in the season with the playoffs approaching, Washington's football team goes on strike. A team of replacement players are recruited in one week to try and save their standings in the playoffs. Looking at it from a critical standpoint, this isn't a good film, looking at it from an entertainment standpoint, it's a feel-good film. It's not the best as far as the plot or developmental aspects, but it offers an enjoyable story. The plot wasn't anything special. While it did follow a story, there wasn't anything developed with any of the characters lives, how they got there, their emotions, and everything else. Even the main character and his love interest- nothing was developed throughout the film, was incredibly anti-climatic and had one dimensional character portrayals. The comedy aspects were good, a few times I found myself laughing out loud. The different personalities that were shown were funny as no one was on the same page. But, same thing goes for the supporting characters, nothing was developed or even touched upon. Despite all the negatives I have described, this really was a feel-good story. It was short and sweet so it didn't have time for all the extra developmental aspects, but did its part as a simple, enjoyable film. Rating: 5/10 |
The Hangover:
This is honestly one of my favorite comedy’s to turn on and always be able to enjoy.
Storyline: When Doug is getting married in two days, his three friends take him out to Vegas for his Bachelor party. Everything is going great, until they can’t find Doug and have no memory of the night before. The storyline is great, besides a few minor plot holes. By the way everything is presented to the audience, it seems like it could actually happen. Along with that, it makes the viewer figure everything out with the characters at the same time, and get the in the personable feeling with them and the story. The characters are great as well. Everyone fits their roles perfectly and since each character has some sort of background to them, it works. The development is something that could be worked on. Though we did get to see all the events unfold and a little bit about their lives, we didn’t get to see anything about their characters in specific. The ending came around to be a little cheesy or cliché, but it was a logical way to end the story. This is a laugh-out-loud comedy that is entertaining for everyone. Rating: 7/10 |
Identity Thief:
Storyline:
When Sandy gets his credit card information stolen, he tracks down the con artist who stole his identity, Diana. He finds her and is determined to make her pay for what she’s done. I’m not sure what I was expecting from a comedy with Melissa McCarthy and Jason Bateman, but it wasn’t half bad. There were definitely scenes that were over the top, too much to handle and just dumb, but on a whole, enjoyable. For the purpose of being a comedy, the plot was established more than others. With that, the story started off to and established the tone and kept a good pace. It did have cheesy lines and a predictable story, but it’s meant to be that way, so it can be overlooked, to an extent. Same kind of thing, the acting wasn’t anything special. None of the characters felt personable or true to their roles. Lastly, the action sequences were completely over the top (in a bad way) which had terrible special effects, depth and believability to them. This was stupid and can definitely be overlooked, but is an engaging watch. Rating: 4/10 |
Analyze This:
Storyline:
Ben Sobol, a quiet, shy psychiatrist, runs into the mobster Paul Vitti, who just so happens to need help with his growing stress and anxiety. The characters were clashing rather than working. Billy Crystal was pretty dry and forced with his humor, which failed to make me laugh, it was only funny about half the time. While on the other hand, Robert De Niro had created his ruthless and powerful persona, but his performance didn't live up to it. I think if the comedic aspects were placed better and the acting was more realistic, I would have been satisfied, because even though this was not meant to be amazing, it could have been so much better. The story never felt like it got anywhere, either. When it finished, I was wondering what the message was or the idea that was meant to come across. I'm disappointed with the performance of Robert De Niro, as he is one of my favorite actors and really failed with this film. I have never seen him play a gangster poorly, until this. This really didn't keep my attention throughout, I checked my watch multiple times and its just over an hour and a half. This was really just a blah movie, as nothing exciting or interesting happened. Rating: 4/10 |
Deuce Bigalow: Male Gigolo
Storyline:
Duece Bigalow is a down-on-his-luck kind of guy who cleans fish tanks for a living. One day he is mistaken as a male escort while he is house sitting for the real male escort. I didn't have high hopes for this film because judging a movie by its cover, it's staring Rob Schneider as a male escort... but honestly it was pretty funny. You almost felt bad for his character because everything bad happened to him and he gets screwed over all the time, until his knowledge of fish gives him an opportunity of a life time. Some scenes were laughing out loud funny because all the women he had to take out were the weirdest, quirkiest, stereotyped people. His dates were: Carol, who is severely narcoleptic, Ruth, who has Tourette's, Fluisa, an obese woman weighing 750lbs, and Tina, who has a pituitary gland disorder that causes her to be extremely tall, who didn't even fit in the frame every scene. They all were hilarious , interesting and perfectly fitting to the story. The story kept a constant flow as well. I was never checking the time or wanting it to be over with as it was intriguing. Overall, this is a slapstick, dumb humor comedy that anyone should see for a good laugh. Rating: 6/10 |
Holmes and Watson:
If Netflix was offered to buy this film and wouldn't purchase it, you know it's going to be terrible. In addition to that, there were only 4 people, including me, in the theater on opening weekend, so that's a guide as to how it was.
Storyline: The worlds greatest detective, Sherlock Holmes is joined by his best friend and writer, John Watson. They are hired to save the queen of London from being murdered. Will Ferrell hasn't made a good movie in years, so I don't know why I was excited for this. This honestly was an embarrassment for everyone who produced it. The storyline was so weak, and a dumb concept as well. It was incredibly predictable, and the only funny parts were the ones from the trailers. I wanted to leave the theater at least five times because I just couldn't handle it anymore, it wasn't even created in a way where it was enjoyable, just uncomfortable. The acting was awful. There might not be anything else I can say other than that. Their English accents were not believable, every scene was incredibly forced/staged, and there was a ten minute scene in the middle of the film when they started singing their lines, which was dragged on and not needed in the first place. Overall, this just was a terrible film created by the director, screenwriter, actors and everyone who had a part in producing it. Don't waste your time or money on seeing this, and I don't recommend seeing it on video either. Rating: 1/10 |
The Money Pit:
Storyline:
Walter and Anna want to buy a home, but they do not have a lot of money to do so. Their real estate agent, who happens to be their friend, finds what looks like the perfect home for the perfect price, until everything inside falls apart. This is a quirky, corny comedy that is somewhat realistic. Young couples never have enough money for their dream homes, and this is everyone's worst nightmare when it comes to purchasing their first house, as it most likely would never happen to this extent, it still feels relatable. There were a couple scenes that I laughed out loud from Tom Hanks. I think he played his character perfectly, being the guy who is always down on his luck and can never catch a break. The connection between him and Shelly Long kept the flow of the movie going as well. On the other hand, there were a couple characters I think were pointless to the story and didn't need to be there, but keeping in mind a comedy like this is not set for a stellar storyline, but to be entertaining. Definitely not the best thing out there, but it's worth watching! Rating: 6/10 |
The Spy Who Dumped Me:
Storyline:
When Audrey realizes that her boyfriend is a spy, she travels across the world to fulfill his dying wish with her best friend, only to get entangled in an international spy heist. Honestly, I don’t know what to say other than this was awful. I have no idea how this movie was able to be produced because of how terrible it was and not a comedy in any way. The acting was awful. It felt incredibly staged and tense the entire time because no one was expressing their lines as they should’ve. It was fake and unrealistic. Another negative is the storyline. It was so predictable. Nothing came as a surprise, and nothing was funny. Everything that was supposed to be laughed at, I didn’t laugh. It just felt awkward and uncomfortable the entire film. The trailers created the illusion that this film would be somewhat okay, but it was completely the opposite. Do not spend your time or money on this movie, it’s a complete waste of time. Rating: 2/10 |
Old School:
Storyline:
When Mitch finds out his girlfriend has been cheating on him, he moves into a house right off a college campus. There, he starts a fraternity with his two best friends. This movie was filled with dry humor and funny stupid scenes the entire time. The acting was pretty good, just like how all dumb comedy’s are. Just looking at Will Ferrell normally makes me laugh, and he was super funny in this. There were many scenes that were just so stupid, they were funny. Mostly every humor movie isn’t set out to have a crazy storyline. That being said, it was pretty easy to guess the ending, but it wasn’t a deal breaker. Being critical, there were some characters I thought were either useless or underdeveloped, but this isn’t really the kind of movie to really care about those minor things, just there for a good time and to make you laugh, this is a typical Will Ferrell movie. Rating: 7/10 |
Strange Brew: |
This movie is straight up stupid, but you won’t stop laughing.
Storyline: When two Canadian brothers are on the quest for free beer they end up having to work at Elsinore. They then walk into a massive mind control scheme that they have to stop. The storyline is solid and perfect for a comedy. It starts off with a monologue from the two main characters telling you about the movie they created, and from then on, it just gets funnier. The main characters say “eh” almost after every sentence, which is hilarious and ironic because the two actors are both Canadian in real life. Most things in this movie don’t make sense and are incredibly unrealistic, but the way everything flows together, it works. This is a classic, slapstick comedy that I am always in the mood to watch. Anyone will enjoy this and needs to see it. Rating: 7/10 |