MARVEL & DC |
Iron Man:
Storyline:
A genius billionaire, Tony Stark is conducting a weapons test overseas, only to be taken by terrorists. When he builds a suit to escape, he keeps it to fight crime. Considering all superhero films are hard to believe in the grand scheme of things, this twisted the average storyline into something better developed and extremely interactive. Even having some holes along the way, Iron Man is the start to a character that only develops better over time. The plot, although it can be predicting at times, was never uneventful. It had a strong lead that was both convincing and relatable, supporting characters that were relevant, and a villain with some depth to him. All contributing to create an enjoyable film, this has an unmatched vibe. The antagonist was eye catching as far as entertainment value, though was low on the scale with quality. Having a foreseen change of heart, it takes the suspense down a notch. Though Jeff Bridges creates a character that is enjoyable, he just can't overcome the negative aspects in order to be independent, therefore taking him and the film down a notch critically. While the action was not very prominent, it filled the story with something that was needed without taking away from development of the protagonist. The ending built to a suspenseful turn of events, which was promising, utterly entertaining and finished the film strong. 7.5/10
8.5/10
|
Iron Man 2:
Storyline:
With the world knowing that Tony Stark is Iron Man, he faces both the military wanting his technology and the fear of it falling into the wrong hands. With this sequel diving more into the entertaining action than anything important, it still offers the same fun and entertaining watch. Robert Downey Jr. acts as the stabilization and only thing truly grounded in this film. While this didn't need to be made and provides no real substance to the characters arc, it is a way to introduce a few characters, bring back a loveable character, and obviously make money. The villain, as unrealistic and underdeveloped as he seems just about sums him up. Barely touching on his relevance, there is no real evidence backing up his purpose to the plot. He has no significance to any part of the protagonist or film. While he had a few cool moments, it felt rushed and pointless for his character and the story overall. Downey Jr., however has only grown into his performance as time goes on. Becoming more realistic and believable each time the audience sees him, there is never a dull moment because of his comedic seriousness. Ending off on an abrupt note, it will always be enjoyable. But, having more negative aspects than positive, this is overall useless to the franchise, as nothing outstanding or relevant comes from it. 5.5/10
7/10
|
Iron Man 3:
Storyline:
Having insomnia after his time in New York, Tony Stark is now fighting the terrorist known as The Mandarin to protect the ones he loves. This final film to individual development was a great way to seal the deal for this character. He took an amazing arc from the first to this, focusing on what makes him better and so on. Evolving a character that has become mature and sophisticated, but still the same character everyone loves. This film shifted the tone into something that sets the story for other Marvel films. The technology and other minor details that normally don’t get focus was substantial. Going all out and taking the time that isn’t needed for character development was logically used in this case. The villain both was intriguing and bothersome. At some points, I understood all the geared feelings and was on the right track for his portrayal. Then, at the same time, there were the same amount of instances where I felt the complete opposite. These inconsistencies became noticeable and created a not-so-powerful or fearful antagonist. Still featuring the same cheesy jokes, entertaining action and balancing it all out with steady characters, this was a positive note to end on and gave back the satisfaction of Iron Man after the rough, previous film. 7/10
8/10
|
Captain America: The First Avenger
Storyline:
Steve Rogers gets turned away from the army every time he applies due to his small stature; he gets a chance that turns him into a super-soldier, known as Captain America. The foreshadowing this film has intertwined is incredibly prominent within both the MCU and this film individually; although this film itself might have some bumps along the way, it develops and showcases an iconic character that is relatable from the start. Some critical issues come up in terms of the foreseeable dialogue and the considerably corny storyline. Even by symbolizing what Captain America is all about, though undeniably cheesy in moments, it still is attention holding and anticipating. Being put into an ongoing plot, the audience gets more of a personal connection to the character instead of a detail-driven plot. While this is not a problem by any means, it's rather a collective issue, whereas other films within the MCU are more story-based. Tying the finale to an extremely restless antagonist/protagonist conflict, this is exceptionally drawing. Captain America: The First Avenger is an essential film within the series, providing an idolizing character, intense action, and a thrilling ride from start to finish. 7/10
8/10
|
Captain America: The Winter Soldier
Storyline:
Struggling to embrace his life into the world, Steve Rogers teams up with Black Widow to take down the assassin known as the Winter Soldier. From the first moment on screen, the clear tone that is established is held true for the duration of the film. Along with the connection within the MCU, this is just as important within the franchise as it is entertaining. Creating character development with true detail, the flow is not only action, rather a balanced mix between the two. Relevantly introducing characters with the same significance as reprising roles, no one was unfit or deemed unworthy of their screen time. The directing and fighting choreography of this film is genuinely held high on the grading scale, as it is one of the best from Marvel. Each movement is carefully created and showcased in the most personal and realistic manner. Straightforwardly, this is just simply super entertaining. Producing a fun and well-rounded film, this has awesome stunts and action to go along with the sturdy groundings of a plot this makes up. 8.5/10
8.5/10
|
Captain America: Civil War
Storyline:
The infiltration of political involvement in the Avengers puts a rift between Captain America and Iron Man. Despite all of the films within the MCU being entertaining as it is, Captain America: Civil War provides one of the most sensible and level-headed films to arise within the series. Creating a logical storyline, providing the same familiar feeling, and having a solo film that actively compliments other characters, this helps the ongoing development of the characters and films. Though not the most action-packed within the series, this succeeds by not putting too many details and/or thought into the plot. Letting a conflict that is raw and practical develop, it progresses with an effortless flow and intense fighting choreography. Including many additions to give either comical relief or better introduce their character might have been obvious within the moment but was enjoyable and not distracting. Although everyone serves a purpose, the conflict and theme shine through. Providing nothing but solid directing, the Russo brothers prosper in creating an absorbing, cinematic film. Proving to have relevance, practicality and delivering the well-loved action, this is a compelling watch that is worth the time. 8.5/10
8.5/10
|
Thor:
Storyline:
Due to his arrogant nature, Thor is stripped of his powers and sent to Earth to live amongst humans until he is worthy. While this film proves to be more than just a faced paced action, this slightly corny, but candid life lesson that complements the witty dialogue is one for the books. Despite the few issues that arise within, this is an establishing introductory film that is much needed within the MCU. That being said, the circumstances in which the conflict presents itself is nothing tangible. Struggling with the consistency of a proper tone to fit the protagonist, that attributes to the blocky transition between acts. However, the lack of a correlation between any given element doesn't transfer to the entertainment value this brings. Never having a dull moment, the intense action was just enough to hold its own but offers some relevance and importance to the character in the meantime. With all things considered, Thor is enjoyable, adds clarification to a well-known character, and most of all creates a world to live in while watching. Being quite basic, but cinematic and sophisticated, there might be a dramatic shift of the character in future films but is still worth the time. 7/10
7.5/10
|
Thor: The Dark World
Storyline:
When the Dark Elves plan to use an ancient weapon to destroy all Nine Realms, Thor must travel back to Earth to stop them. Giving Thor: The Dark World the benefit of the doubt, as the idea for this story features a creative turn of events, the rate at which it was executed was poor. Truthfully having no relevance for the character development, this film was a cry for help in terms of a good production or intriguing watch. The core of this film was based upon a plot that was too complex for its multiple subplots and weird progression. Throwing too many elements in at once, there was no backbone to the story; while this tries to redeem itself with its beloved characters, the negatives are too prominent to notice anything else. Highlighting an antagonist that is seen in too many films to be anything original, the absence of fear from him kills the vibe that was intended. On top of having a dim-witted character arc, the hero fulfillment of it all was slim to none. Given that it is quite easy to pick this apart, this was a developmental stepping stone in terms of the series-connected into one. Proving to have something important linked to it later within the MCU, this only serves as a progression to the end rather than anything overly enjoyable in the mix of it. 6/10
6/10
|
Thor: Ragnarok
Storyline:
Imprisoned on the other side of the universe, Thor must race against time to save his home of Asgard and its civilization. My problem with this is not with the film or the character as a whole, rather the drastic character change. Thor flips so drastically from this film compared to the rest of the other films before with no development. That being said, the film on a whole features a quick on its feet, witty dialogue that is extremely quotable. Though largely unscripted, which creates an unmatched tone throughout, not only being humorous this is grounded in the mix of things. However, the antagonist has her fair share of issues. Falling into a category of telling rather than developing, the lack of fear, authenticity, and her power not being shown is prominent. Thor: Ragnarok shifts the tone of the character but has a shaky film to do so. Although numerous funny moments make this film worth it, the act of including too much at once gets the better of this. Being one of the better products within Thor's films, this is rough in finding its way but is still enjoyable. 6.5/10
7/10
|
The Avengers:
Storyline:
Earth's mightiest heroes have to learn to fight together to save the world from Loki and his army from space. This film was and still is an iconic film that created the start of this franchise. It features a solid development from all characters involved, plays an amazing storyline and consists of the same corny humor that never misses a beat with its action. While I am the first one to admit my bias with this film, as I grew up on this and could recite almost every line, it still is incredibly well done. The introduction of each character was done briefly, but effectively, starting the progression, development, and setting of the story off right to the film. Though this could take part in my bias, the script has many quotable and rememberable moments. This film is the exact definition of the easy and achievable marvel humor that just gets that unspoken feeling. Having laughable, empathetic and understandable interactions, this film runs off of its well-written plot. The last 45 minutes and climax was what everyone was waiting for, and did not disappoint. Having what the entire film was building up to, it was incredibly suspenseful and never had a feeling that an outer space army was fake. It achieved a realistic factor and delivers from each character as they provide their relevance. This film is incredibly intriguing for fans of superheroes or not. Honestly giving something for everyone, it's a great addition in the MCU and is what started it all. 9/10
9/10
|
Avengers: Age of Ultron
Storyline:
After turning a peacekeeper program into a technological terror threatening mankind, the Avengers come together to stop it and destroy their leader, Ultron. Opening this installment with an action-packed mood setter, this came to have the same tone as the rest of them, which succeeds on that note, but fights to provide a cohesive, sturdy film altogether. The editing was the one thing I was neither impressed nor interested in. Some moments, having a sped-up, fast motion character in them felt extremely unrealistic, and it was done more than once. While at the same time, the mashing of all heroes in the frame at a time was very unorganized and just had too much on its plate on screen. The plot itself is one that upon initially seeing it, I didn't think it was that spectacular. However, it is a great development of furthering the plot on a whole within the series, acting more as a filler film. This still has the same and happily expected, witty dialogue that lightens the mood and carries that tone throughout. All in all, I think this second installment to The Avengers franchise gets a bad rap just because it's not as good as the rest; it still is incredibly entertaining, has some cool action sequences, and brings the witty superhero film that is just entertaining. 7/10
8/10
|
Avengers: Infinity War
Storyline:
The Avengers must be willing to sacrifice all in an attempt to defeat Thanos before he puts an end to the universe. Being one of the most involving films within the MCU, this is the beginning of the end that is perfectly and strategically planned. Showcasing the utterly profound dedication from everything that was built leading up to this, Avengers: Infinity War is a game-changer. Having the usual and expected Marvel humor, this finds a way to be equally iconic as others combined within the genre. Capturing each character's essence seamlessly to blend and compliment the other characters, there never is a dull or overpowering moment no matter what it may be. Furthermore, the score and directing not only bring out the comparison and parallels but intertwine with the principle of what has happened -- and the precise development of it all. However, the beauty of this film comes from the superbly implemented plot. Showcasing the side of decisions that don't usually get highlighted, the reasonable turn of events is easy to wrap your head around and understand. Making sense within the series and coherently acknowledging the issues at stake, this is arguably one of the best within the franchise and provokes many thoughts. 8.5/10
9/10
|
Avengers: Endgame
Storyline:
When no one is left but the few remaining Avengers, everyone works together to bring down the person who started it all, Thanos, in one final battle. By not knowing what to expect from the final film in the franchise, it’s hard not to go in with high hopes wondering how the story could possibly end for many of our favorite hero’s. Picking up from Avengers: Infinity War, the viewers see the side of everyone that no one has seen before- defeat. Even with a slow start, we truly get to see what that does to not only the main characters, but everyone around them. It has the development of a drama and deserves the 3 hour screen time in order to establish everything within the story. Without going into detail and spoiling, there were a couple characters and their situations that bothered me enough to ruin their development; throughout the whole film, these characters dragged on and weighed down the story. Though this did have a slow start, it made up for it with a good plot. With the climax feeling a little rushed, the focus was primarily on the story rather than the action, as both shined in different lights throughout. The end of this franchise definitely was heartbreaking, closed doors, and answered the questions we all knew would come. I don’t know another way everything could have come together and made sense, but, it still leaves the question of that’s all? Nothing in particular is the cause, but it leaves me feeling not as impressed as I should be. 7.5/10
8/10
|
Guardians of the Galaxy:
Storyline:
Peter Quill is caught stealing an orb that everyone in the galaxy wants. In order to get the money from a promising buyer, he teams up with strangers to pull the job off. Chris Pratt is Peter Quill, nothing else can really be said. Everything about his character was 100% convincing. On top of that, every other character was spot on with their performances which took the viewer a step away from the formal dramas or scripted comedies that were used to, rather giving a film that everyone can find something in it to enjoy. It's hard to choose the highlights to discuss because of all the enjoyable aspects it brings. Arguably one of the best things this has to offer is the soundtrack. Not only does the song selections fit the characters and scenes entirely, but they make the viewer feel closer to the film on a whole and right there in the moment. On a behind-the-scenes note, both the directing and camera work was perfect. Each scene flowed seamlessly to the next with long shots, close angles, or accurate and precise cuts just to add to the overwhelming amount of positive aspects this provides. The comedic script with a serious plot creates this easy going, action packed, high anticipation film that doesn't necessarily get downgraded, but could be pushed aside or undervalued. Rating: 8.5/10 |
Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2:
Storyline:
When the guardians are caught stealing important information and are on the run trying to escape, Peter’s father unexpectedly shows up and creates another problem. Following up from the first installment, it’s pretty hard to top such a great production. While this doesn’t disappoint, it’s nowhere near the first film in the franchise. Basically had the same things, just not as good. The opening credit scene kicked off with a great start which established the comedic tone and eventful flow and (for the most part) was well maintained throughout. I enjoyed that in this installment the audience learns more about everyone's past and backstory. With a well developed plot and characters, it was effortless on that end. That being said, the jokes on a whole were just not as funny and some of them became dumber than usual, rather than laughable. The soundtrack was lacking big time. Along with that, the antagonist had a promising start when we first met him, but ended up becoming a predictable, flat character. Overall, this film doesn’t ruin the franchise, rather it relies more on the success of the first film to carry it along. Rating: 7/10 |
Ant-Man:
Storyline:
Equip with a suit that shrinks your size and increases your strength, Scott Lang is recruited by Hank Pym to stop a heist that will destroy the world. Ant-Man may not be the best film or superhero out there but is a not-so-Marvel feeling, Marvel product. Putting a comedic twist onto the typical and rudimentary plot, this is cast well enough to be entertaining in light of other issues. Considering the overwhelming fact that the antagonist was the most predictable and unimaginative character, he killed the tone. Weighing the enjoyable plot down by taking his screen time to be something unbelievable, the story as a whole suffered from this inconsistency. That being said, the authentic performance that embodies Paul Rudd is enough to make this film worth the time. While he is thrown into a plot that is not too worried about making anything cinematic rather appealing, it succeeds in what it was going for. Having a dependable and humorous protagonist that is ever fitting, he carries this film. While falling into a rut of an unoriginal conflict and an overpowering stereotypical antagonist, this film still provides an easygoing, lighthearted watch. Though nowhere near the best in the MCU, this thrives in what it was going for - comedic entertainment. 6/10
7/10
|
Ant-Man and the Wasp:
Storyline:
Scott Lang is on house arrest. Once he’s almost completed his sentence, Hope and her father need his help to find her mother. Paul Rudd is back again with a truthfully fitting performance. Although this is just about the only consistent and positive thing this has going for it, it is enough to be mentioned. The script achieved its purpose by getting a laugh but was stupid and nonoriginal in doing so. While this might not have always been laugh-out-loud funny or having all the jokes in the right place, it still was enjoyable to a certain extent. That being said, it quickly became overpowering, and never learned when to stop with any given aspect. Consisting of major plot holes and multiple scenes that just didn’t feel necessary to the storyline, this was incohesive, to say the least. While this is something that could have been done better, revolving around an average guy that’s not serious, it adds to the relatability/persona of the character. However, the enjoyment from the film comes from the more times you watch it. While it is easy to notice the critical issues and focus on them, sometimes a stupid, dumb action film with a bit of comedy is all you need. 6/10
7/10
|
Black Widow:
Storyline:
A film about Natasha Romanoff in her quests between the films Civil War and Infinity War. Easily a fact that it took too long for Black Widow to get her own film, this was surprisingly in-depth/entertaining for what it entails. While, with anything, there will be issues, they come rather as confusion than anything that halts the progression of the film. For something that is centered upon a character who has been in the limelight for years but never treated with such specialty, I wish there would have been more fulfillment from an origin film. While I am complimentary over the developed plot and completion this film adds to her timeline throughout other MCU films, this felt unsatisfying for Romanoff dealing with her past - which has been the sole conflict throughout time. Nevertheless, this features good storytelling. Being perfectly cast (with Florence Pugh easily stealing the show), the supporting performances add to the engaging but heartfelt theme. However, this falls into a pit of wish-washy characters that confuse their true motives and importance overall. On top of providing unfathomable stunts (no matter how intriguingly realistic the CGI looks), it raises the bigger question: this was made to further the MCU and provide an enjoyable action flick rather than completing a character that could have gone out more accomplished – which, in turn, leaves a not so memorable, forgettable film. 6/10
7/10
|
Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings:
Storyline:
Shang-Chi, the master of unarmed weaponry-based Kung Fu, is forced to confront his past after being drawn into the Ten Rings organization. Scrambling to take the recognized Marvel wit and blend it into a film that does not have all its values in line makes for an unfamiliar hero leading the way through an unorganized production. Getting introduced into the MCU by this story, there is nothing to grasp from the character and/or his past. Developing an origin film that skimps out on the much-needed gritty stepping stones to complete the evolution gives the audience nothing to resonate. Yet arguments aside for the preface of the character, the true problems lie in the presentation. Pushing aside the meaning within the conflicts of the antagonist, there’s no substance to make it tempting. While it doesn't help this is not a mainstream hero that people know much about, this misses out on a perfect opportunity -- effectively bringing to light a new age of heroes, power, and antagonism. Not to mention the questionable CGI in some moments and severely wooden chemistry, there is simply not much to take from this film. Although amusing in the moment, you can easily leave the theater learning nothing new about the character and not thinking twice about the film. 6/10
6.5/10
|
Eternals:
Storyline:
The saga of the Eternals, a race of immortal beings who lived on Earth and shaped its history and civilizations. Thinking these characters have as much development as the ones in the Infinity Saga, Eternals believes it is already as prominent. Yet, this rather outlines how unavailing a story can be when it doesn't have its priorities in line. Orchestrating an entire conflict and someone to blame for the problems at stake is cast aside within the third act. Leaving an entirely established portion of the plot high and dry, this subplot is one of many that add up to the sole question: what is the main storyline? Feeling as though each scene was the first take, there is no chemistry to give life to this dry script. From unpowerful concepts to downfalls and arcs that do not affect the viewer, there are no emotions to connect the audience to the characters. Delivering an entirely exaggerated runtime just because it could and including a diverse cast to be involved in the acceptance of today's world, it missed what is important about these aspects in every way possible, leading to a subpar example of what these characteristics have the chance to be. Because this film thinks it can change the idea of something that is already established - the Marvel formula - there may be a correlation among scenes, but that does not mean there is causation for their purpose or why it is happening, which is why this film fails. Leading phase 4 of the MCU down a bad path, the end credits, additionally, accentuate the spoof-like and unprepared feeling of this entire production. 4/10
5/10
|
WandaVision:
Storyline:
Living idealized suburban lives, superheroes Wanda and Vision begin to suspect that everything may not be what it seems. While I can take a step back and appreciate this intricate idea, dedicated parallels, and continual plot, this had its moments that were interesting and incredibly cinematic. Not to mention the graphics and CGI that were convincing, credible, and questioned your sense of reality, there are favorable and pleasing things this has to offer. That being said, it's hard to praise a plot that did not need to be made and could have been achieved in half the time. Having a run time of eight episodes, while some early aspects were developing the conflict for later episodes, they were bland, time-consuming and most of all, run on. Given everything makes sense once it comes full circle, the issues lie within the execution of it all. While anything Marvel is always entertaining, the creative idea this has doesn't come close to furthering the development of two likable and interesting characters that have much to dive into. Providing the same information that was already known, this truly felt like just another product that was made by an established name for money. There are worse things to watch than WandaVision, as this has its worthwhile aspects, but it comes more as a disappointment both rationally or for entertainment. 6/10
6/10
|
The Falcon and the Winter Soldier:
Storyline:
Sam Wilson and Bucky Barnes team up for a global adventure that tests their abilities - and their patience. Despite the first three episodes having a blocky start, the final three make this a must-see. Straying away from the overly chaotic and mismatched introduction of characters that were shown in the beginning, this proves itself throughout by relevance and well-deserved screen time. Diving into deeper topics that are important and pertinent to today's standards (without shoving it down your throat) certifies that this is more than the action superhero concept. Intertwining the character development and initiative that comes with influence, power, and control over others, this makes a statement that speaks to the harsh truths. Giving time to two characters that have numerous and plenty of issues only makes them more enjoyable. Throwing in the same Marvel humor, intense fighting choreography, and intriguing plot points, this finds its way into the MCU perfectly with its subtle but fundamental and rooted parallels. Regardless of the few dumb one-liners and poor CGI scenes, the most prominent issue of all is capping the development of half the characters. Taking the few six episodes (which deserved more time) to supply the prominence of once seemingly minor characters was dwindled with the finale. Without a doubt worth the watch, The Falcon and the Winter Soldiers can please non-Marvel and Marvel fans alike despite the urge for more and lessening the effect that could have been. 7/10
8/10
|
Loki:
Storyline:
Loki resumes his role as the God of Mischief in a new series that takes place after the events of “Avengers: Endgame.” Proving itself to be more than just a connection within the MCU (even though it is an engaging stepping stone), Loki delivers on showcasing the power of its protagonist and developing a mind-boggling turn of events. Being utterly cinematic, this kind of storytelling acts upon the dedication of its fans and simply a well thought out plot. The modest implications we get to see of his power and the sophistication that has become his character are practical and absorbing. Finally validating being more than just a villain, you get to see a glimpse into not only the visually pleasing power of his magic but the strength that is behind a misunderstood, dynamic character. Authenticating the importance and depth that goes behind the meaning of this raises undoubtfully intricate questions. Paying attention to the fine details and the themes this embodies, there's plenty of compelling action and witty Marvel humor, which creates a thought-provoking product. Adding in hints of romance and the certainty of more to come, this is a solid, notable watch purely for the development and the completion this adds to the ongoing timeline. 8/10
8.5/10
|
The Punisher:
Storyline:
After the murder of his family, Marine veteran Frank Castle becomes the vigilante known as "The Punisher," with only one goal in mind: to avenge them. In the face of a rocky and lengthy start, this takes its time getting its feet on the ground; working out its mishaps within the first few moments on screen, The Punisher prevails by creating a fully investing turn of events that doesn't shy away from the gutsy and enduring subject matter that can make or break a character such as this. With utterly problematic characters, pure devotion to their performance/writing guides this series into one of the most true-to-life superhero adaptations. Leading with the sincerely committed and bonafide performance from Jon Bernthal, there's next to nothing that this doesn't authentically pinpoint. Not being afraid to get dark and into the determined gore that separates this from others, this deserved more time. Maintaining an unwavering tone, showcasing absorbing characters, and having a realistic story that is complemented by intense action, there isn't much this gets wrong. 8.5/10
8.5/10
|
Daredevil:
Storyline:
A blind lawyer by day, vigilante by night. Matt Murdock fights the crime of New York as Daredevil. Arguably the most accurate (Marvel) comic to screen adaptation yet, Daredevil single-handedly builds a well-known hero in its own light. Constructing a personable moral code to live by and screen time that never once loses your interest, this is one of the best Marvel adaptations. With the help of incredible storytelling and crisp editing, this draws you in. Directing wide shots that showcase the dedicated training and choreography, Charlie Cox furthermore is one responsible for such a realistic picture. Capturing both the development and background behind such motives, the moments of growth within the script are complemented by fight scenes that give you chills. Truly creating the best of both worlds, this is balanced by both the sensible evolution of characters, and their hard-hitting, formidable scenes. Portraying actions have consequences with an internal battle of vigilantism/faith in the law, this series carefully depicts a broken individual. Showcasing from the start that living a double life, among the crime, lies, and defeat, the two don't co-live. Though some arcs were raised high and dropped in an instant, every character introduces another comprehensible importance toward the protagonist. While the supporting roles hold value, so does the utterly aggravating antagonist with pure (and comic accurate) rage. 9/10
9/10
|
Spider-Man: Homecoming
Storyline:
After helping with the Avengers, Peter Parker goes back home where he lives under Tony Stark's watchful eye and tries to be the friendly neighborhood Spider-Man. Major issue- I hated how Tony Stark basically did everything for him. Peter Parker is supposed to create everything he has by himself and figure out what it is to be Spider-Man, but instead he gets everything handed to him. Yes, there are scenes showcasing how smart he is or creating some things, but basically everything he has that makes him Spider-Man was created by someone else. I also wasn't a huge fan of the villain. Michael Keaton just wasn't really fitting it. When it comes to villains, I either hate them and despise everything they do, or I feel connected and relate with them, I felt neither of these things for his character. Because I didn't feel anything with his character, it made his backstory not relatable and their final fight not as climatic. Although I don't like the story behind Peter, I thought they finally casted him well. He was personable, cordial, dorky, and pretty funny which is everything you think of when it comes to Spider-Man. He fit the character and that helped the flow of the story go along. In general, the flow of the film was good, Spider-Man was casted well, and the storyline was engaging, I am just disappointed that the third installment of the film was not better than what it was. Rating: 6/10 |
Spider-Man: Far From Home
Storyline:
Following the events after Avengers: Endgame, Peter is left to step up and help save the world. This second installment was better than the first by offering better character development, clever humor and an entertaining villain. While the first act was very bland, cheesy & slow during the moment, it added to the developmental side of things after the fact. The pace picked up for the better and maintained it after. The antagonist had a lot of depth to him. While he was a big part of the slow beginning, once the spotlight was shifted toward him, the audience figured out the meaning behind his actions, which were accompanied by his illusions that really made the film interesting. The script made the picture captivating even at the times where it wasn't high paced. While the comedic aspects were spot on, everything else was as well and made the audience unable to look away. A big negative I had toward this though was the CGI. Why this of all things was what fell short, I have no clue, but it was lacking in many ways. Not only were moves predictable, but they didn't have the sense of believability or intensity to them. From being disappointed in the first installment, this was a great addition into the franchise and the MCU. Rating: 8/10 |
Spider-Man: No Way Home
Storyline:
With Spider-Man's identity now revealed, Peter asks Doctor Strange for help. When a spell goes wrong, dangerous foes from other worlds start to appear. The reason this film is so special is because of the fan-driven attention to detail. Bringing nostalgia and interrelated parts that collectively rely on each other and the loyalty of its involved audience to have it all come together, this film depends on its fanbase like no other. This plot specifically shows that Peter isn’t a kid anymore. He can’t take care of everyone and realizes his actions have consequences. Not only achieving a rational understanding of so many intricate aspects, but it also shows us the immense growth of the character. And this is the turning point. In order to fully respect him, since we have seen him be a bad-ass, but always in a childish light, he is now unveiled as the independent superhero that he just needed time to become. While my only negatives come from the storytelling having its blocky moments and this film balancing on the brink of information override, imperfections are what makes Spider-Man, Spider-Man, so the good outweighs the bad. Entirely worth the hype, Spider-Man: No Way Home breaks out of its childish themes by implementing a logical understanding of a complex thought, inventing antagonists with relevance and grit, and dealing with real-world responsibilities. CLICK HERE FOR A LONGER AND MORE IN-DEPTH REVIEW I WROTE FOR THE GRCC STUDENT PUBLICATION.9/10
9/10
|
Everything Everywhere All at Once:
Storyline:
An aging Chinese immigrant is swept up in an insane adventure, where she alone can save the world by exploring other universes connecting with the lives she could have led. Though the concept of the multiverse is something that should not be taken lightly, as it deserves the utmost delicacy and screen time that it's been given, this adaption rather acts on the most mundane aspects it brings to the table. Getting brownie points for the inclusion of a thought-provoking plotline, even that cannot bring to life the flat characters and story. However, just because I did not enjoy it as much as the fans/critics doesn't mean I hated it or that it isn't worth watching - as it deserves to be seen. What this film embodies, however, are themes that go deeper than alternate realities and futuristic lifespans, like the dynamic of family, neglect, and maturing. Yet, becoming only half impactful, this doesn't live to its full potential as its storytelling goes back and forth with its priority. Failing to dive headfirst into either a mind-bending alternative world to live in or the time-sensitive real-life problems, both clash in becoming unorganized chaos amidst a film that relies on structured chaos to function. While the special effects immerse the audience into a fathomable picture and creative storytelling with a different but distinct point of view, Everything Everywhere All at Once is not wholly bad, and likewise, is not wholly good. Feeling the need for more substance and intuitive stuff to fit inside and fill this film, it was nothing more than an average story with the power to be out-of-this-world. 6/10
6/10
|
Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness:
Storyline:
Dr. Stephen Strange casts a forbidden spell that opens the doorway to the multiverse, including alternate versions of himself and Wanda Maximoff. Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness, in simple terms, spent all its runtime on a vain attempt with a wasted effort that focused on the utmost mundane and unimportant aspects of the new main and front characters of the MCU. In more complicated terms, this film thought by rushing and pushing concepts that aren't far enough in reach to fully understand would create a mind-bending scenario. Frantically setting up the villain origin story of Scarlet Witch, her reasoning, rise and fall, and momentum in which she acts on her driving force fall so short of expectation, words cannot describe the missed opportunities. Trying to do too much at once with her inner conflicts, how her story is being told is presented in an overwrought, hectic, and blur of a "character arc" that only furthers its emotionally uncontrolled plot points. However, with that in mind, this film arguably was divided equally between three leads, all of who get walked on by the unimpressive storytelling and boring action. Becoming more of a letdown in every single way, no one has an "it" moment, the supporting characters are irrelevant, and surprise cameos are thrown out so often at this point, that you become numb to the importance they would have had. Yet, within a film that's well over two hours with one of the strongest, if not the most powerful superhero as the antagonist, a literal magician, and the creativity/superiority of Marvel special effects, this film takes advantage of the dedicated fanbase and the understanding of the concept of alternate realities and uses its name to get people in the door. Thinking it's bigger than what it acted on, this developed into one of the most beside-the-point films - being low-stakes and inconsequential, this should have been the complete opposite. 4/10
5/10
|
The Amazing Spider-Man:
Storyline:
After Peter Parker is bitten by a radioactive spider, he gains new abilities and ventures to save the city. While this film and the many, many productions of this character raise a debate of who is the best Spider-Man, objectively speaking, it's hard not to like this film. Having an upbeat tone to the story, entertaining action, and the performance from a protagonist that delivers with his unique personality, there are worst ways to spend your time. However, succeeding in some areas leaves room for failure in others, as the script was rough. Having easily foreseeable lines and cheesy banter, the conflicts make for a less realistic/sophisticated feeling to a plot that had achieved it originally. Nevertheless, the grip of anticipation, restlessness, and wholesome characteristics from the well-acted protagonist are enough to make this a must-see. Although proving itself to be more than just a superhero reboot, The Amazing Spider-Man has its faults but prospers in light of creating an independent film that doesn't rely on just its name to carry it along. 7/10
7.5/10
|
Black Panther: Wakanda Forever
Storyline:
The people of Wakanda fight to protect their home from intervening world powers as they mourn the death of King T'Challa. Given the nature of this film regarding the real-time mourning and loss of Chadwick Boseman, you would expect much more sophistication and creativity in every aspect. Whether it was the misleading advertising of what this film truly was, the negativity I brought regarding these faulty films depicting a powerful comic character, or just the simple truth that Marvel is losing their touch, Black Panther: Wakanda Forever was nothing more than a money grab. To put it lightly, there are so many better ways to spend three hours. This was incredibly dragged on with the lack of development in needed areas and wasting minutes explaining character details that entirely don't matter. While it is confusing and annoying to realize in the moment how unimportant the gist of what you are watching is, it further leads to questioning the purpose. Cramping the climax and actual heart and soul of what this story is trying to depict in the final ten minutes, this film couldn't decide if it wanted to be a melodrama or an action flick - thus resulting in a painful experience for any and every watcher. Not to mention the incredibly average performances, there was no emotion transferred into the audience. While the characters are grieving, there is absolutely no embodiment of pain that the audience is able to feel. In no way have I ever felt personally connected to Black Panther, it still hasn't changed once the legacy has moved forward within the family after T'Challa. And that's what this film gets wrong: it expects the entire fandom to feel as connected, sentimental, and nostalgic to characters we just got to know. SPOILER - we do not. With an antagonist that is too complex for such a simple storyline and needs more than a few lousy "I am not like other villains" lines that claim he is not like the rest of them, this film truthfully is too big for its own good. Diving too deep into losing a loved one without a lifeline to keep it in check, action that was non-existent, and a plethora of mundane characters, the only positive this has to offer is crisp scenery and directing. Looking at this as a standalone series or a continuation of the MCU, this lacked the enthusiasm it needed to fulfill the fans – instead, it was a story full of nothing memorable. 2/10
2/10
|
Black Panther:
Storyline:
After the death of his father, T’Challa must take his place as king in his home of Wakanda, and as Black Panther. When an enemy threatens his power and rule, he must form allies and protect his people. The hype for this was insane, but the film itself was just disappointing. Political beliefs aside, this film was set up for a disappointment from the first scene. The storyline was not interesting at all, being incredibly predictable and uneventful. The characters were very flat, not giving the viewers any information they would need to truly understand their story and relate. In addition, some characters and scenes that were pointless to the story. Obviously, superhero movies are going to have aspects that are make-believe, because they are, but that vibe was there the entire time; nothing felt like it could actually happen, it felt like a fake story being forced into production. The “action” scenes had a boring, anticipated, and fake feel throughout. This correlates with the terrible special effects in the fight scenes. Another thing that bothered me was the music. Songs were played at random times that had no relevance to the scenes or the flow of the film. Marvel may have made a substantial amount of money through this film, but they did not make a good one. Rating: 2/10 |
Captain Marvel:
Storyline:
Taking place in the 1990's, Carol Danvers (Captain Marvel) is caught between the galactic war of two alien races, and must figure out her past in order to save the world. I didn't go in with high hopes, so my review was basically what I had expected; a rushed plot, weak characters/development, and anti-climatic fight scenes. Starting from the first scene, it had already failed to grasp my interest. The storyline was rushed on the developmental side of things by not providing details in correct times in order to fully understand or expressing them in a way that is believable. The whole story revolved around her finding out who she truly is with flashbacks of previous memories, but all the memories really meant nothing to the storyline. I mean this by what she remembered- the relationships shown in her memories were meant to feel relatable and heartfelt, when in reality they only felt like a scripted and forced bond between her and her past life; which brings me to my next problem, the acting. It's not that I hate Brie Larson, it's just that I am not a fan of her acting, as everything she is in she is basically emotionless. Times where she should be confused, angry and discovering who she was, (and so on), she just has the same expression and body language every time we see her. I think the role could have been better casted- that being said, she's not the only one who had this issue, characters like her best friend and mentor could use some help as well. In addition to all this, aspects like comedy and slow motion were used in awkward places, plus action scenes that were predictable and uneventful, which normally I would say is disappointing, but I don't think this had too much potential to begin with. Rating: 5/10 |
Venom:
There were so many problems I had with this movie, I am disappointed, but not surprised.
Storyline: Failed journalist Eddie Brock tries to take down the head of the Life foundation which is secretly holding many alien life forms. He merges with the alien, Venom, leaving him with superhuman strength and power. Honestly, I don’t think there was one thing I liked about this. First, the whole movie was incredibly choppy. Each scene was cut harshly and didn’t flow to the next. The story jumped from one idea to another and then back again with no correlation. Second problem I had was with the storyline, because there really wasn’t one. The plot followed absolutely nothing with rushed action scenes and no development. Not to mention the not-so-believable CGI. Along with the plot having no development, none of the characters did either. The villain was a terrible actor that made it uncomfortable and irritating to watch because he was so predictable. But all the characters were incredibly flat leaving you with no information about them. Rating: 4/10 |
Venom: Let There Be Carnage
Storyline:
Eddie Brock attempts to reignite his career by interviewing serial killer Cletus Kasady, who escapes prison after a failed execution. Providing nothing of use within the character, development, or entertainment value, Venom: Let There Be Carnage follows in its predecessor's footsteps in providing a poorly created, uncomfortable to watch, and a truthfully forced and unfunny film. Centering an entire storyline off nonselective conflicts, there is no sole issue to focus on, and too many half-done concepts for anything to have meaning. Becoming too vague within what this was trying to do, this film has no justification for why it was made. Sadly, this even struggles to provide an engaging antagonist. Though Woody Harrelson shows time and time again he can averagely play the same character each time, he rather does so with no relevance. Taking a shockingly minimal amount of screen time, there literally was not enough time to give his dull-witted nature a chance. Not to mention terrible special effects, copying scenes from all the Spider-Man films, and painful "humor", this had a drive that was going nowhere and just simply doesn't click. 4/10
4/10
|
Morbius:
Storyline:
Biochemist Michael Morbius tries to cure himself of a rare blood disease, but he inadvertently infects himself with a form of vampirism instead. Morbius had me repeating the same question over and over throughout the entirety of its runtime: what the %$^& is happening right now? The pure and utter confusion of what this story was trying to do is quite difficult to put into words, as it’s quicker to compile a never-ending list of adjectives describing its faults than it is to figure out the sole purpose of this film. The horrible special effects are more alarming than anything. Horrendously reusing the same sequences and CGI which are classified as the “action” of the film weren’t cool the first time they did it and most certainly are not after the 20th time, either. Continuously adding a blur of streams onto every single object in the frame, furthermore, just doesn’t cut it. Not to mention the breakneck speed of these questionable action sequences, you can’t afford to blink or else you’ll miss the majority of it. Fear not, though, as the overuse and overabundance of extreme slow-motion is the only time it is not a race to see how fast these scenes can be. Having a perplexingly blandly written script, a too serious tone, and characters that are surprisingly more colorless than the already faulty film amount to what Morbius is: an inferior film that no one even asked for. 2/10
1/10
|
Deadpool:
Storyline:
Wade Wilson, a mercenary, unexpectedly gets turned into Deadpool by an evil scientist, Ajax. Once escaping from the experiment, he sets out to kill the man who did this to him. Ryan Reynolds is utterly hilarious. Every line he has it’s witty and incredible, as this role was truly made for him. Showcasing his humorous talent, he shines within this performance and could be his best role. The trouble-free script easily fits in this flowing film. Never missing a beat, this always keeps you on your toes no matter what is taking place on the screen. This takes aspects from action, comedy and superhero films, but creates innovative storytelling to distinguish itself. The sequencing of ideas was executed perfectly. Though narrated and addressed by the protagonist, as he tells the story, there is always something engaging that is relevant. Having this crisp mindset in place makes for a solid development and flow to the film. The directing was very personal as well. Depicting the protagonist in such a personable manner, it made for an in-shoe and relatable feeling from a topic that is the opposite. As for the action sequences, the same effortless, understanding feelings come for the protagonist to create an intriguing watch. 8/10
8/10
|
X-Men: First Class
Storyline:
In the 1960s, superpowered humans Charles Xavier and Erik Lensherr work together to find others like them, but Erik's vengeful pursuit divides them. While there are things to hate and love within this film, there's no denying that it is entertaining for Marvel fans. Providing intense, realistic action and an involving storyline, X-Men: First Class didn't need to be made but finds a way to be absorbing. Casting utterly specific and fitting roles, the performances were profoundly in-depth. Giving the same tone as the others within the series, this rather takes the vibe and turns it into the mature and experienced feeling it was capable of all along. Developing the much-needed change of pace with the suitable lead characters, this was personable and well-executed. Furthering the realistic standpoint, for the most part, providing sensible and rational CGI/action sequences, this took a course on a levelheaded mindset that never got carried away. Given there are a few moments that are forced, misplaced, and the fact that the series would carry along just the same if this film wasn't made (regardless if it was created well), it's still a fun and enjoyable watch. 7/10
7/10
|
X-Men: Days of Future Past
Storyline:
With mutants facing extinction, Wolverine volunteers to go back in time and change the past to save their future. This undoubtedly builds an in-depth turn of events through characters, past character arcs, and time travel, which is intricate for sure. Yet considering the persisting feeling this felt like it didn’t need to be made, while objectively this is a decent film, this lingering concept takes hold. However, visually appealing aspects like impressive CGI that compliments the intense action are consistent and effective. Proving to be more than just the established characters, this is executed admirably, involving well-choreographed stunts in addition to great storytelling. Creating the vibes that deliver on what the audience likes about this series, this, in turn, supplies a charming watch. Although the performances were adequately engaging, the excessive amount of star power in addition to basically re-doing the other films in the series, it's hard to grasp an original feeling collectively. X-Men: Days of Future Past is incredibly entertaining and a quite well-made film, playing into its strong suits that know how to please an audience. But, while that's enough to like this film and be one of the better ones within the series, it sadly feels more like a money grab rather than having a purpose within the franchise. 7/10
7/10
|
X-Men:
Storyline:
In a world where mutants exist and are discriminated against, two groups form for an inevitable clash: the supremacist Brotherhood, and the pacifist X-Men. While this film has a large agenda to accomplish and do effectively, it may introduce many characters on screen, but provides nothing more in-depth. With a plethora of characters, their backstories become quite careless. Although arguable for fans of the comics, this rather doesn't please the introduction for many who are unfamiliar. On the other hand, this was cast spot on with individualistic performances, but due to the shaky presentation, it's difficult to see the positive qualities. Given this indisputably holds your attention and keeps you in the moment for its entirety, it doesn't mean it's anything recommendable. From unsatisfying characters to poor special effects/action sequences, this has too much going on to keep up with itself. With a rushed conflict and hectic resolution, the finale is not only poorly executed, but predictable. Falling short in developing anything deeper than words on a screen, simply put, X-Men lacks any sort of substance to make it worthwhile. 5/10
6.5/10
|
X2: X-Men United
Storyline:
When anti-mutant colonel William Stryker kidnaps Professor X and attacks his school, the X-Men must ally with their archenemy Magneto to stop him. Despite being well-rated and received by critics and fans alike, X2: X-Men United runs with its predecessor's tone that was already all over the map. Going even further on a weakly developed route, this is only mildly entertaining, considering the pure potential of these characters. Carrying itself as though it developed more than it had, the existing characters feel as unimportant as the new trivial additions. With minor inconveniences, stale dialogue, and a lack of connection between characters, there's not much to grasp. Although having its entertaining moments, without doubt, the action can still amuse; instead, it largely consents to a notion of enjoyable in the moment, but forgettable after the fact. Considering this, the biggest issue of all is that this film accomplishes nothing. Doing the same thing and dealing with already known circumstances creates the familiar problems and resolutions that have already been handled. With the deprivation of originality, the already unsatisfying concepts surprisingly are teamed with a substandard climax and final act. 5/10
6.5/10
|
X-Men: The Last Stand
Storyline:
The human government develops a cure for mutations, and Jean Gray becomes a darker uncontrollable persona called the Phoenix. While this film didn't derive from a well-developed continuation, it comparatively ruined everything it was leading to. Quickly skimping character arcs and not being able to control the course of the story, X-Men: The Last Stand is not well perceived for good reason. Creating too many subplots, there is not an antagonist nor conflict to reign prominent. By not having a sole problem, with too many aspects happening at once, there is no one to rely on and nothing to blame. However, paving way for the Phoenix and her screen time is incredibly interesting. Although deserving better writing and choreography to accentuate more than what is on the surface, she, without doubt, steals the spotlight. Given the underlying aspects this film runs with are the direct events from its forerunner, this serves no purpose to the characters. Left unsatisfied, this humdrum franchise is nothing but the ordinary action flop. 4/10
5/10
|
Logan:
Storyline:
In a future where mutants are nearly extinct, an elderly and weary Logan leads a quiet life. But when Laura, a mutant child pursued by scientists, comes to him for help, he must get her to safety. While the X-Men films have been nothing but shaky and inconsistent, Logan defies odds to create a true to character and solidifying finale. Thriving with a perfect tone, this is nothing close to a comic-like feeling, rather a developmental and emotional ride. With franchise-best performances, the monumental steps this takes to ensure all ducks are in a row are satisfying and moving. Affecting the audience with heartfelt situations, the anticipation is both adrenaline-pumping and built up. From a suitable setting to apt dialogue, this achieves the individualistic persona of the character without skimping on the nuts and bolts. Evolving on the maturing and growth of who Logan has turned into goes deeper than just the gritty action or words on screen. With a methodical and sensible turn of events, each movement carries the dedication to the story. While this has a few moments that don't feel connected, they add to the imperfections of character. Problems and all, this ends on a solidifying note that leaves the what-ifs answered by real-life repercussions. 7.5/10
7.5/10
|
X-Men Origins: Wolverine
Dark Phoenix:
Storyline:
After being struck by a cosmic force in outer space, Jean Grey spirals out of control. It's up to the X-Men to save her. Everything inside this film truly was off the map and was trying to do more than what the storyline was written for. These new films regarding the past versions of X-Men characters are solely relying on their name to carry it along, as it has no relevance to the ongoing films and has no substance. If this is a solo film regarding Jean Grey, arguably there doesn't need to be an antagonist because she is already playing out the main conflict. Yet there always will be a villain in a superhero film. Nevertheless, the antagonist was awful. Having absolutely no purpose, she wasn't even underdeveloped, as there was no development, to begin with. Including horrendous acting and no relevance whatsoever, she was pointless. All performances were dull and weak, though. Not only were they played poorly, but they were well-known characters put into a story they didn't belong in. Consisting of plot holes and subplots that drifted so far from the basis of the plot, there was no hope in saving these characters. This film was terribly written, produced and executed. Having no setting of the story or background information, it had a feeling of it being not intriguing from the get-go. 3/10
3/10
|
The Losers:
Storyline:
A CIA special forces team is betrayed and left for dead by their superiors, galvanizing them to mount an offensive on the CIA. The smaller (and incredibly frequent) issues that arise within this film all come from the sole mishap: DC can never get the tone right. Unfortunately for The Losers, it falls into the pickle of having enjoyable content that's executed poorly; thus creating and implementing an idea that isn't in tune with itself. Featuring intriguing characters, this falls short in proving their relevance both within the story or to each other. Each bringing something to the table and having their moments, nothing is developed, shown, or transcribed to the audience, only a fake notion of telling how you should react. Using too much unfitting slow motion in some moments to turn around and use none everywhere else only adds to the blocky progression. Having no aspects match the unsaid vibe, becoming overly comic-like in only some areas, and using an excessive amount of animated CGI, nothing blends. While this is a good time passer for what it's worth and those who enjoy the genre, this leaves a blank feeling after watching. 4/10
5/10
|
The Batman:
Storyline:
When the Riddler begins murdering key political figures in Gotham, Batman is forced to investigate the city's hidden corruption. The Batman is overrated and complicated. No matter how badly I wish that I liked this film, you can’t force yourself to enjoy something. And even more so, you can’t make three lengthy hours of exceedingly boring details amount to stellar cinema, no matter how cool the idea of liking this film may seem. While the direction is a clear and dark picture with impactful sound, the lighting and score truly depict a quite eerie vibe that transfers onto the audience. However, the nature of this presentation is forceful. I mean this in the sense where the randomized angles in which we see Batman are unorganized, abnormal, and even at one point, blurry - all telling the audience how to feel at every given second rather than letting the actors do the work. Trying to be too artsy, this film takes itself too seriously and doesn’t hold itself up to what it really amounts to: a story full of nothingness. A perfect example is an excess amount of comic characters (The Penguin, Catwoman, and The Riddler), all of who proved themselves irrelevant. While they feel undistinguished due to the tasteless writing behind the characters, the action of including them in the first place is the real problem at stake. Not to mention the lack of an “it” moment, intimidating fighting, or the hard-hitting not-pulling-any-punches individual this was supposed to be an entire film about, no character had any of the brutal or harsh moments that were advertised and no events had any significance. Seeing more accomplished performances from Robert Pattinson and Paul Dano (both who were nerfed of their full potential), a more palatable plot that actually makes sense, and sequences that justify the action, it becomes a struggle to find a positive, which should never be the case within a superhero flick. This normally wouldn’t amount to anything that’s too annoying, but taking into consideration this was playing all its cards toward a remorseless, barbaric Batman that no one has ever seen before, when it's not what was promised, it's an even bigger letdown. CLICK HERE FOR A LONGER AND MORE IN-DEPTH REVIEW FOR THE GRCC STUDENT PUBLICATION.4/10
5/10
|
Zack Snyder's Justice League: Justice is Gray
Storyline:
Making sure Superman's sacrifice was not in vain, Bruce Wayne aligns forces with Diana Prince to assemble a team. The fact that this simply was not good the first time makes for a film that isn't different besides overdoing a concept that doesn't have the power to do so. Assembling a compilation of the same scenes (just excessively prolonged) puts together a drawn-out story with no spark to drive from. Once again, overdoing the slow-motion, theme songs, and terrible CGI, the vibe is torn between trying to be sophisticated or comic-like, which is off-putting, as neither can shine over the other. Not to mention the plenty of issues that easily come with the random, lengthy camera angles and unfitting script, this was severely painful to get through, as it was never-ending and non-attention holding. Snyder's cut of Justice League is possibly worse than the first due to the extensive screen time for no reason, each scene being unbearably drawn out, and creating a product that doesn't differ from the first. While the positives this offers is a color scheme that was more appropriate for the plot and effectively adding one scene to the climax, they aren't anything significant; thinking it's better than what it's worth, this fails to do something. 4/10
4/10
|
The Suicide Squad:
Storyline:
Supervillains join the super-secret, super-shady Task Force X as they are dropped off at the remote, enemy-infused island of Corto Maltese. Acquiring the taste for what should have been done originally, James Gunn brings to life everything that failed so vigorously the first time. From an unmatched score to characters that effortlessly spark a conflict that can’t be forged, The Suicide Squad is surprisingly a superb piece of cinema. Finally obtaining the perfect blend of a comic-like feeling with the realism action, DC got the tone right. Not shying away from the blood and gore that fits with the story, each aspect precisely communicates with the other. Maintaining genuine humor and sincerely raw performances that fit the vibe, there is room for each character. Proving to be relevant and motivated with purpose, the development is a sentiment that is unfeigned. Yet what this overlooks is taking too many aspects from other superhero films that it fails to have an original voice. Specifically, in the third act, this falls into an inevitable pit where it feels too much like other films by both Gunn and competitors in the genre -- not to mention a few unbecoming and sporadic unfit moments that were trying too hard to be stylistic. Despite the parallels, this succeeded in all the right places, provides a genuine laugh, and delivers on a faithful concept that's well made. 8/10
8/10
|
Wonder Woman 1984:
Storyline:
Diana Prince is living quietly in the 80s until she has to gather all her strength to defeat Max Lord and the Cheetah. Disregarding the fact that this was nothing but a money grab, Wonder Woman 1984 fails in more aspects than it achieves, resulting in a film that didn't need to be made, an incoherent story, and an excessively long film. The most prominent problem in this film is the Cheetah. She was not poorly portrayed, rather she was completely irrelevant. There is already an antagonist, Lord, who is written effortlessly into the story and who has clear intentions. The Cheetah, however, lacks any clarity to her motive and is just a subplot that was more distracting than connected to the protagonist; the film would have gone on just the same without her, making it better. Having this plot take the audience nowhere important, for the majority of its screen time, this was packed with lousy filler scenes that were averagely entertaining. Given that this was visually pleasing and featured some intriguing action, it's obvious this was a bunch of random ideas thrown together. While there isn't much hope at this point anymore for DC sequels, this was still a drag on the character that has been a showrunner. This is diverting while you're watching but is nothing to be proud of. 3/10
4/10
|
Wonder Woman:
Storyline:
When a pilot crashes and tells of conflict in the outside world, Diana, an Amazonian warrior in training, leaves home to fight a war, discovering her full powers and true destiny. With everything this character stands for, Wonder Woman surprisingly honors a true to character film that is rather well made. Having a fair share of its misplaced moments and overdone aspects, all in all, this is engaging and personable considering. Undoubtedly holding your attention throughout, this has enough humor, romance, action, and drama to be worthwhile. Overdoing the slow-motion comes with no shock; while it's not enough for it to not be cool sometimes, the rest is a little tiring. Nevertheless, great use of the theme song and score reassures the sometimes shaky visual presentation. Given this has decent action being DC, it's inconsistent. Not becoming solidifying, the intermittent and only realistic half-the-time action takes its toll on the otherwise determined production. Yet this film thrives off of irreplaceable chemistry with genuine charm from both performances. Being the backbone that takes this from a distant film to a mindful, living in the moment one, this relationship sets in motion a raw theme and utter heartbreak that was unequivocally needed for a moving character arc. 7.5/10
7.5/10
|
Harley Quinn: Birds of Prey
Storyline:
When word breaks that Harley Quinn and the Joker broke up, she has no protection left from the people trying to kill her. It comes as no surprise for me disliking this film, yet I still question why I get my hopes up. This truly roots from an interesting protagonist, though every time, the DC Universe can never find a way to execute. Starting on the wrong foot with the entire plot, there genuinely was no hope for this coming back to a logical standpoint. More plot holes existed than a storyline itself creating a hodgepodge of poorly written and chaotic scenes that call itself a story. The humor was ineffective, especially paired at times that wasn't needing its contribution. It was hard to find a light in this aspect because it was predictable, unsuccessful, incohesive, and awkward. Including too many unbelievable instances, it was hard to watch with an open mind. While I will say the entire film was consistent in this regard, it doesn't make it any cooler or entertaining. This aspect was taking away from the realistic factor superhero characters have. The poor character portrayal only adds to the list of things this film doesn't get right. While Birds of Prey thinks it is better than what it is, it’s a waste of time. Not to mention, Ewan McGregor spoke in an English accent for the opening ten minutes, only to switch to an American accent for the rest of the film. 3/10
3/10
|
Shazam!
Storyline:
When 14 year-old foster kid, Billy Batson comes across a magical wizard who transfers his powers to him, when he says the word "SHAZAM", his powers flow through him. This exceeded my expectations, to say the least, as this has more going for it than what first meets the eye. The characters were portrayed genuinely. The protagonist, played by a kid and an adult, both were created and adapted spot-on. Never getting the feeling that they were two different people, the two effortlessly complimented each other. The humor was easily intertwined within the plot. Just about everything was worthy of laughing and achieved its purpose. Although filled with stupid humor, it never created the feeling of something dull-witted or overpowering, rather it was just dumb enough to laugh at but smart enough to keep you on your toes. Neither the plot or the characters were developed as well as they could have been, but it wasn't a deal breaker. Not everything added up at the end and most of the conflicts were uneventful, but overall wasn't too noticeable. On a negative note, the antagonist didn't cut it. He was a stereo-typical bad guy, with his predictable past and cliché lines, to which he didn't even play well. Feeling out of place within this story, he was more of a drag than anything worthy of a conflict. On a whole, this wasn't created to be stellar cinema, rather a comedic and lighthearted story. Shazam! is definitely enjoyable for anyone, is incredibly entertaining, and does exactly what it was made to do. 7/10
7.5/10
|
Aquaman:
Storyline:
Aquaman, a half-human, half-Atlantean has to defeat his half-brother from taking over the ocean. To save the people of the sea and land, he must take his place as king. The performances were dull, underdeveloped, and flat – to which even made me laugh due to the fake representations. Given his father was a large part of the backstory, there was no development. The same goes for the antagonist and the other Atlantean's, as their development was just as bad, which lead to a choppy and awkward flow. Despite the fact that too many scenes had no relevance to the story, just about every transition ended with an awful, cheesy explosion. Although DC normally goes for the “comic book” action sequence approach, this was on a whole new level. As for the fight scenes, they were the same uneventful and boring choreography just in a different setting (which was not cool). The over use of slow motion is something DC does frequently, and they’re good at overusing it. It’s cool when it happens unexpected and at the right time, but when it happens every time someone goes for a punch or gets hit, it’s not, and that’s a lesson that hasn’t been learned. The close-ups of Aquaman with his theme was worn out by the end. The whole film was choppy, there were run-on scenes and then others that were rushed, and poor cinematography, overall creating just a bad film. 2/10
2/10
|