Devotion:
Storyline:
A pair of U.S. Navy fighter pilots risk their lives during the Korean War and become some of the Navy's most celebrated wingmen. Despite advertising this film incredibly well, the product didn't live up to its potential. Having two strong up-and-coming actors, high-stakes action, and a genre that always will have people eagerly waiting to watch, this had almost everything in its favor and managed to flop. What was the most disappointing about this film was the fact that we have seen this story before. Disregarding, for a moment, that this is inspired by true events, this is a tirelessly seasoned concept that never takes on an ounce of originality. Creating the space to showcase the individuals who made history, the progression was not touching, it was aimless. Filling a two-hour runtime with details that reveal themselves to be pointless, the number of times I checked my watch was unmatched. Over and above that, the performances held no levity. There was no personal connection, attachment, or feeling of closeness. Written to be flat, the dull characters were clearly not brought to life by the script - but they weren't by the actors, either. With the absence of chemistry and empathy extended, the constant talks of bonds, friendships, and togetherness just wasted time. The lack of a harmonized theme/evidence to support it results in a meaningless film. Devotion has good it's moments, from crisp direction to insane plane stunts, there are aspects to appreciate and give a nod to. However, that does not mean this is worth the time. Failing to represent the first African-American Aviator for the U.S. Navy in a well-made film, this sadly fell into a poorly made, quickly written, and easily forgettable film. 5/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 5/10
|
The Whale:
Storyline:
A reclusive, morbidly obese English teacher attempts to reconnect with his estranged teenage daughter. It doesn't happen very often when you see a film that is so remarkably raw that you never want to see it again. The Whale exceeds any expectations of its deceiving looks and most importantly gives Brendan Fraser the space for an unstoppable performance. While the topic of obesity and the trajectory of America is an underlying topic that is quite overused within adaptions on screen, what this story tastefully changes is the ones that are affected by this are depressed, broken individuals. Following the utter pain of heartbreak, the self-loathing and hatred that unknowingly begins to set in before it is too late raises a chain reaction of poor decisions and uncertainty. The uncensored honesty given by Fraser becomes almost a real-life tribute to his own career/life choices blended with undisguised honesty. Bringing me and every member of the audience to a tear, it is unrealistic for Fraser to not receive an award and high praise for his performance. That said, the plot itself and the progression created a vibe that made it hard to stay engaged. This is not meant with any connection to the difficult-to-stomach subject matter - even with it being brutally candid - rather the tone did not compliment what was being portrayed. With any uncomfortable premise, there either needs to be an artistic timbre or defying mood, whereas we were given nothing. There was no underlying voice or spirit which continuously reeled you in, it required effort to make yourself stay engaged. It is easy to jump the gun regarding this film: on one hand, it is a meticulously illustrated tenor of the hidden side of someone's life and on the other, it is a miserable and wretched two hours of pain and animosity. Am I glad I saw this? Yes. Would I recommend this film? I don’t know. It takes a certain mindset and a clear lens to truly appreciate this story and I am still not even sure how I am processing it. 8/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 3/10
|
All the Old Knives:
Storyline:
Two CIA agents and ex-lovers are brought back together years after a failed rescue attempt and forced to blur the lines between profession and passion. While the only reason this film seems to be watched is because of the inclusion of Chris Pine and the famous cast, the honest truth is that even with their star power, that doesn't hide the fact that there aren't many positives regarding this jumbled plot. Given the beautiful scenery, the crisp editing and directing play into one of the things working for their benefit - the setting. Putting the audience in the character's shoes at any given moment, the storytelling from a first-hand perspective sets the tone for the sophisticated feeling. That said, the details that fill the captivating images are not presented in a coherent way. To say the least, the runaround and hodgepodge of a non-linear storyline needed the stability of direct narration or a character to latch on to. Rather, in the absence of both, the result turns into a confusing run-through of the past that could have been told in a better way. On top of that, there is absolutely no indication of the future or the past (besides hairstyles) which leads to a questionable viewer each time it changes - which *shockingly* switches every few moments. And, though the construction of the plot is the true downfall of this film, All the Old Knives isn't all that exciting otherwise. From stiff and lifeless performances all the way to predictable small talk dialogue, even with supporting an unpredictable finale, there was just too much going wrong to save this film on a whole. 6/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 6/10
|
Father Stu:
Storyline:
Follows the life of Father Stuart Long, a boxer-turned-priest who inspired countless people during his journey from self-destruction to redemption. Although Father Stu is a religious-based story and holds many concepts that are related as such, at the end of the day, the real grit of the film is the harsh truths and life lessons that we all need to be reminded of from time to time. Given this level of faith and religion is not something I practice nor would I classify myself as educated on, the beliefs of the character are not forced upon the audience. Rather, you are not living in his world, but watching from an outsider's perspective all the things that are happening with no control. While Mark Wahlberg delivers upon a raw and indicative individual who is flawed but not lost, a more powerful script would make his performance that much more impactful. Having the potential to be deeply chilling and the utmost candid, due to dialogue that only brushes the surface of vulnerability, conversations that are quite predictable, and supporting characters that are pretty lifeless, while it is still affecting, it is not out-of-this-world phenomenal. All the best aspects of this film come from what this story embodies - it's never too late to be a better person - and not its setting and first glance subject matter of religion (which is normally and understandably quick to scare some off). I do not want to see this more than once, as it is not impactful enough to be worth the slow tone and dragging on progression. However, it raises thought-provoking questions about how you are living your life, regardless if everything is not cinematically perfect. 6/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 6/10
|
The Outfit:
Storyline:
An expert tailor must outwit a dangerous group of mobsters in order to survive a fateful night. Surprisingly biting off as much as it can chew, The Outfit defies all odds in creating a mysterious crime drama with individual characters. While having its unjustifiable moments, the bigger picture this looks at is just as enjoyable as it is well made. What's creatively played within this story is that it has all the familiar aspects that period crime pieces have, but with storytelling that dives into layers and layers of individual stories. While they are all related to each other, each character has their time to shine and is deliberately separate. Not to mention the distinct, off-centered tone that immediately finds a way into the audience's perspective, watching the downfall and antsy mystery from the outside builds tension for an unpredictable turn of events. Never knowing who to root for, confusing the good guys for the bad, and appreciating the cinematic direction come as just the surface of elements that carry the strong weight of this rare film. Having its imperfections chalked up to be worthwhile, while this may not be high on anyone's radar, it deserves to be - it's simply the fresh, innovative, and original cinema that we don't have enough of these days. 7/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 7.5/10
|
The Card Counter:
Storyline:
Telling the story of an ex-military interrogator turned gambler, he is haunted by the ghosts of his past. Though I have my respect for the sophistication of Paul Schrader and unspoken essence for any one of his films, The Card Counter, however, relies too heavily on the suspense of the unknown that it is so little we do know. Trying its hardest to be cinematic and mysterious, it, in turn, develops a randomized and off-putting progression. The uninviting portrayal of Oscar Isaac is borderline too devoted in comparison to everything and everyone else included. The supporting roles have no chemistry, and while that's arguably the point, it's not consistent. Creating a world where half the aspects are rigid and cold, the rest are lively and upbeat, making all details discredit each other. Not to mention the unsystematic presentation of characters - all of who feel like you are watching the A-list actor, not a character they're portraying - and unplanned chaos unfold in every scene. Given it takes a mood and mindset to enjoy this story, as it's deliberately slow and making a statement, it's simply too plain to make the impact it's trying to. Thinking it represents something bigger than what it is, from the randomized ticking score to the overly silent implications, this film is odd, and not in a good way. 4/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 4/10
|
Death on the Nile:
Storyline:
While on vacation on the Nile, Hercule Poirot must investigate the murder of a young heiress. Marketing all its weight toward the immaculate star-studded cast, to which is nothing more than a few big names, Death on the Nile loses track of the goal at stake - solving a murder. Elapsing too much time on developing the characters before any sort of conflict happens, the rest of the elongated film is hard to stay tuned in to. Creating a pace that was just as slow as the riverboat they were on was driving, the right ideas were executed in the wrong ways. For one, the overly dedicated Kenneth Branagh, from a little too heavy accent to becoming the only one that felt to care about their role, no one was consistently on the same page. Throwing an excess amount of characters in the mix, to which only half of whom proved themselves relevant, this film needed to either include more A-Listers or even the cast to collectively create a vibe. Instead, there are too many people involved and too much happening for any sort of responsive understanding from the audience. While there is no denying the satisfying finale, without the jaw-dropping unpredictability that should have come with it, this only seals the deal to an average film. Despite its beautiful depicting directing, this needed a dependable screenplay and plausible presentation of details to make it recommendable. 5/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 6/10
|
King Richard:
Storyline:
A look at how tennis superstars Venus and Serena Williams became who they are after the coaching from their father Richard Williams. I am the first to say I have no prior knowledge of Venus and Serena Williams, nor the sport of tennis. That said, this film actively lessens both women's accomplishments by valuing the wrong details. Though I gather Richard Williams is credited for a large sum for their success, that fact is not the problem that arises within the story. It rather is a lack of commitment to focus on one person. Making the story, at times, fully about Richard, the inconsistencies show themselves when gears are instantly flipped to be about only Venus instead. Therefore, the act of half-doing each "protagonist" creates a spiral downfall that leads only to the discredit of what the story means. Not to mention the utter dwindling of Serena's success, this furthers the notion that if this film were only about Richard and/or Venus, leave it that way. Instead, this puts another talented individual on the back burner, and quite frankly, makes the audience forget she's there. Getting the appeal for this film through the star power of Will Smith, the real touch, however, lies with Jon Bernthal's individual portrayal. Without the pure dedication and stability to keep this film afloat, he ensures that King Richard at least has a heartbeat. Besides him, the rest is a skippable film that slowly loses your attention. 5/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 5/10
|
One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest:
Storyline:
A criminal pleads insanity and is admitted to a mental institution, where he rebels against the oppressive nurse and rallies up the scared patients. Despite being the cultural phenomenon and cult classic that it has developed into today, One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest is a good film, don't get me wrong, but it's not the great one that people make it out to be. I am one as any to appreciate the indescribable performance and many forms Jack Nicholson is able to invent, as he does in this. Assembling motions and facial expressions that are eerily transferred into the audience further and further into the film, there's no denying his talented portrayal. Yet, whether it's the over-hyping of said performance, the concept of the story, or even the time this was made, this just isn't EVERYTHING it's cracked up to be. Respectively, there is better we've seen from Nicholson, more intuitive and creepy plotlines out there, and films that have aged better than this. Failing to have the uneasy suspense of a thriller or the drawn-out slowness of a melodrama, this needed to lean more toward one way or the other. While ending with an abrupt and unpredictable climax, it catches the audience off guard to leave more questions and afterthought about what the story really embodies. Yet this is what no one mentions about this film: even with a creative finale, it's just the average story that doesn't have the substance to be a favorite. 7/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 7/10
|
Sweet Virginia:
Storyline:
A former rodeo champ befriends a young man with a propensity for violence. Beginning with a superb introduction of details that heightens the eerie suspense, Sweet Virginia's quiet delivery creates an individualistic feeling. Having a deliberate and uneven shift of heavy silence and less sound is a prime example of silence speaking louder than words. This simplistic screenplay has none of the usual nuts and bolts needed to make a hearty story, so it leaves space for the actors to bring their characters and emotions to life. Specifically, Jon Bernthal. Expressing immense range, he never fails to amaze me. Candidly depicting a morally broken protagonist that is still striving to see the end, without his dark and rageful portrayal, this wouldn't be watchable. Yet what's quite annoying about this film is that my initial reaction went over very well, due to the sophistication of its minimalistic presentation with a battling protagonist. But with time, the impromptu ending leaves more questions than answers, abrupt plot holes, and a resolution that counteracts the sole conflict. While it's easy to be critical of this film from odd interactions, bland dialogue, and its lack of purpose, these arguably become the sole reason to like this film: with realistic silence and crisp edits, it strengthens the progression of the breath of fresh air good B-movies create. 7/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 7/10
|
Don't Look Up:
Storyline:
Two low-level astronomers must go on a giant media tour to warn mankind of an approaching comet that will destroy planet Earth. Don’t Look Up is a dramedy that lessens the blow of materialistic individuals who command the capitalism of the world, yet it's not funny enough to be easy-going and not powerful enough to make an impact. Resulting in a lousy form of entertainment, the vast majority of the people watching this film are not the ones who need to take the life lesson away from it, and even then it is a mediocre one that isn’t very impactful. Paving the way with a scatterbrained plot, the nonexistent priorities of the story leave a separation between the characters and the audience but not in a good way. The film consists of shaky still shots, unfocused angles and moving pictures at all times. While I am not one to get prissy about the deeper meanings behind the motives of directors, as films are so much more than just the director, it seems Adam McKay has lost his voice in this one. However, this has quite an indicative and bold premise that many would shy away from, which arguably is the reason this crashes and burns. This film succeeds with an untraditional finale, artsy camera work, and a few effective one-liners. While all have the potential to amount to something great they are unaffecting. Hitting the ground running with a hot-take and loud theme, it has to be paired with the nitty gritty and controversial subject matter/characters presenting it - and it wasn’t. Though harsh, I’m rather being precisely realistic about what everyone's not saying about this film: Don’t Look Up overestimates its redundant storytelling because it's filled with a star-studded cast and a hodgepodge of quirky satire - and then labels itself cinema. Perhaps embodying the very notions it's trying to exploit, it's hard to get behind a once intuitive idea when it's implemented in all the wrong ways. 4/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 5/10
CLICK HERE FOR A LONGER AND MORE IN-DEPTH REVIEW I WROTE FOR THE GRCC STUDENT PUBLICATION. |
Small Engine Repair:
Storyline:
Events spin wildly out of control when three lifelong friends agree to do a favor on behalf of the brash young woman they all adore. I can say with certainty Small Engine Repair is not for everyone, as it's dry, quiet at times, and has an unexplainable feeling of uniqueness. Yet with descriptive performances and fresh, untainted delivery, this is a crisp screenplay with healthy storytelling. While dramedies usually don't effectively capture the brink of both genres, this has a satisfying balance between the two. Easily deflecting real-world problems with humor initially, the deeper into the story, the realization of life hits. Dealing with situations how many normally do, whether it be hot-headed thinking or dramatics, this holds truths that are dealt with constructively. Despite the transition among time change being confusing and unclear, along with an abrupt ending that leaves you needing more, this creative type of film never gets made anymore. Having an odd and not fully there plot, the execution of such details relies on the performances and telling of the story. Sure, there are problems, yet films nowadays need to take a lesson from this film - you don't have to have only A-list celebrities, high advertising, big budget, or a concept that everyone has already done before to be good. Sometimes all it takes is a passionate group and the right audience to appreciate something different. 7/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 7.5/10
|
Kodachrome:
Storyline:
A father and son hit the road to reach the Kansas photo lab before it closes its doors for good processing Kodachrome. Although looking and at times feeling as cheesy as its Netflix productional roots, this contrarily surprises by proving to be both respectable and well off. While there is something to be said for the missing pieces within the character's build-up (lost details, lack of explanation, etc.) and the shaky first act presenting the conflict at hand, the brilliant actions of a superb cast bring these individuals to life. Though words do not do them justice, as the film they are set in is predictable and quite blocky, the honest, raw, and candid emotions pouring within the second and third act make the rest of the unprepared screenplay seem not as important. Yet, what many (myself included) forget is that a film can have off-putting things you dislike or even hate, and it still can be a good film - it is all about the balance between the good and bad and what it means to you. Kodachrome's plot itself is rough around the edges, filled with hectic movements, and an irrelevant love interest, but these imperfections still amount to less than what the beautiful performances and touching theme add up to. As far from perfect as you can get, this minimalist symbolic execution catches you off guard and makes the audience experience every ounce of hate, love, and humor in every moment, as some dramedies can lose their touch on. 7/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 7.5/10
|
House Of Gucci:
Storyline:
When Patrizia Reggiani marries into the Gucci family, her unbridled ambition begins to unravel their legacy. Given this entire production has been playing its cards to showcase its immense talent from its star-studded cast and the intricacies they hold within the family as the reason for people to come out and see it, the cold truth of what House of Gucci turned out to be is the opposite - an unnecessarily long and unaccomplished story full of fluff. Diving into each scene with a different mindset, the tone never reached a consistent pace. Having multiple portions of the story transitioned to be unconnected, the relevance of the entire production gets dismissed by its own doing. What may come as the biggest washout is the heavily mediocre performances. Deserving more from each decorated individual involved, no one was on the same plane. Jared Leto, for instance, while his dedication was overblown, exaggerated, and simply just too much to handle, though completely unfitting, at least his effort was clear. As for the rest of the cast, it varies from feeling like a high school play to the first time any of them had read their lines. Although it is not this film's fault it was poorly produced, as it's a victim of the recent wave of unneeded and underdeveloped Hollywood biopics with A-list stars, instead, what could have been definitive and powerful resulted in something hard to get through and too easily forgotten. 4/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 5/10
CLICK HERE FOR A LONGER AND MORE IN-DEPTH REVIEW I WROTE FOR THE GRCC STUDENT PUBLICATION. |
Belfast:
Storyline:
A young boy and his working-class Belfast family experience the tumultuous late 1960s. It's quite hard to describe Belfast, as the interpretation without a doubt depends on the viewer to take in the meaning. What is a universal notion, however, is that this film is not for everyone - it's slow-paced, dragging, and inconsistent. While it's safe to say anyone could find a way to appreciate it, few would say they enjoyed it. Utterly raw performances, on the other hand, establish the bond among relationships. Portraying lifelike situations and dialogue that is as far from fabricated as one can get, some singularities are skilled and tasteful. Elements like a black and white picture, unique directing, and an untraditional path of a young boy, once more, make what this film stands for undeniably uncommon and wholesome. Having mixed views myself, there is a separation that blocks the sentimental connection between viewers and characters that needed to be established to make things heartfelt. Watching this story from the outside in, there is a dependence on holding the audience's attention and maintaining the progression, but it wasn't there. So, considering the equally creative and distancing aspects, take it for what you will, Belfast is not a must-see, but it's not undervalued, either. 7/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 4/10
|
Ida Red:
Storyline:
Ida "Red" Walker may not survive her terminal illness in prison. She turns to her son, Wyatt, for one last job and a chance to regain her freedom. Placing the audience into a story that was missing an hour of development, Ida Red is bland, undescriptive, and believes it is more in-depth than it truly is. With numerous inconsistencies in the script, this storytelling falls into a troubling pace. Leading the film with an opening scene that was neither cool nor refreshing, that rest that follows has the same feeling, yet it was entirely unrelated. Thus, in turn, develops a compilation of half-baked events that were treated as if they were valuably contributing to an antsy feeling - spoiler alert, they weren't. Leaving details unsaid to be meticulous and artsy is hoping the audience will be on the edge of their seat in suspense, but rather does the opposite. By providing unaffecting, lame antagonists, confusing conflicts with impactless resolutions, and unfitting moments collectively add up to a thoughtless mindset. Thinking that with a well-known cast, a crime boss formula that sells, and an under-the-radar release of a B-movie would add up to a number-one picture, this does not have its priorities in line. Ergo, a lack of relevance for the few ingredients included makes this not worth anyone's time, even for the dedicated Josh Hartnett fans like myself. 3/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 3/10
|
Less Than Zero:
Storyline:
A college freshman returns to L.A. for the holidays at his ex-girlfriend's request but discovers that his former best friend has an out-of-control drug habit. Developing a fully functioning story out of not many details, Less Than Zero is a minimalistic and nonessential watch, but can, however, change the pace of the routine drug film. Proving himself with dedication and resilience, Robert Downey Jr. authenticates his vital role within this shaky story. Attesting his development with his unpredictable movements and motivations, although leading to a dead-end, his diligence was till the end. That said, considering this is an insightful concept, the presentation is unstable. Jumping from one notion to the next, the impression is not as impactful as what could have been. Going forth with storytelling that skimps out on the gritty confrontation that was brewing, this is mildly affecting. While this film has its repercussions that were meant to resonate long after it's done, they are quite easily forgotten. Even if this is pleasantly different, though redirecting your thoughts at the time, after the fact, it's just the middle-of-the-road type of story. 5/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 6/10
|
Layer Cake:
Storyline:
A successful cocaine dealer gets two tough assignments from his boss on the eve of his planned early retirement. Paving the way for Daniel Craig's career, Layer Cake has its bumps within its progression but makes up for it with an eye-catching storyline, not to mention its deserving break-out performance of Craig. Prospering by originating a suspenseful feeling from the get-go, this fast-paced, thrilling turn of events keeps everyone on their toes with each second. Never letting up on the intricacy of details from each scene, there is no one to turn to in this enthralling battle of trust. Amongst the doubt and skepticism, the uneasy suspicion within characters has no awareness of each other. Teamed with brilliant performances from everyone involved, collectively, the dedication is unified. Having mutual diligence to the product at stake, the effort and talent are the same, as this simply is well performed. Given the few implications that were unfitting and editing select moments to the wrong point in the plot, this film is completely entertaining. From an extensive finale to groovy storytelling, this is sure to please in one way or another, even if it's not the top of the list in the genre or the first go-to. 6.5/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 7/10
|
The Greatest Showman:
Storyline:
Celebrates the birth of show business and tells of a visionary who rose from nothing to create a spectacle that became a worldwide sensation. Prefacing my unpopular opinions on The Greatest Showman with the truth of this being one of the most perfectly executed soundtracks and choreography in a musical film, it contrastingly centers around a hurried theme and a majority of useless characters. Developing a mediocre storyline that is poured out into just about every PG, life message presentation, there is nothing different about this. Although this tries to spice up its missing plot points with appealing song and dance, it only amplifies its struggle to create relevance to its flat characters. Not to mention this gets strong critical accusations toward the glorification of P.T. Barnum and his untrue telling of his life story, while the common public (me included) would know nothing about it, it makes you think - this was indirectly written to begin with, and it wasn't even accurate? While this features a musically talented cast and a soundtrack that is listenable after the fact, the telling of the story may be enjoyable, but it's not rewatchable nor well written to the everyday film watcher. 6/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 6.5/10
|
The Eyes Of Tammy Faye:
Storyline:
An intimate look at the extraordinary rise, fall, and redemption of televangelist Tammy Faye Bakker. Attempting to shine a light on an extensive concept, The Eyes of Tammy Faye may be filled with remarkably raw performances, but is halted by a stale screenplay. Leaving too many things unsaid, the film itself has its aspects to appreciate, yet is too unimaginative on a whole to be recommendable. However, with possible career-best performances from Jessica Chastain and Andrew Garfield, their intimate and personal rendition is incomparable. Without their pure dedication, this film would be hard to get through; their mesmerizing talent unconditionally finds a way to touch the audience in one way. Basing this screenplay off the revolving biography film culture, it's not that this film did not have a reason to be made, rather it was not executed in the way it should have - thus creating something unimpactful. Feeling as though there is no true purpose, this is missing a theme or any substance to go along with it. Though descriptive through its costumes, directing, and performances, when there is no moment of truth within a direct story, it raises the question: what's the point? 6/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 6/10
|
A Time to Kill:
Storyline:
A fearless young lawyer and his assistant defend a black man accused of murdering two white men who raped his ten-year-old daughter. Being engulfing from the start, this screenplay is devoted to pleasing the viewers with its anticipation. Carefully adding meticulous details within its execution, the presentation purely works by good storytelling. Living on the same level with the characters, this becomes just as personable and realistic as an everyday situation. Arguably one of Matthew McConaughey's best roles, he doesn't get credit for his unwavering performance. With an utterly dedicated progression, he shines in bringing to life what could have simply been just another law film. Conducting an unembellished, true-to-life individual, his raw depiction is transferred through the audience. While this touches base on some political topics without forcing a heavy feeling, A Time to Kill develops a world to live in within its screen time. From candid emotions to understandable situations, this is by no means perfect but submerges your attention -- even with a few aspects that can get out of hand, considering its small faults, its favors are enough to make this a must-see. 7.5/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 8/10
|
Respect:
Storyline:
Following the rise of Aretha Franklin's career, this is the true story of the music icon's journey to find her voice. Though depicting someone's hardships, upbringing, and independence of any sort is always difficult, Respect provides the feeling that it was made to stay relevant in today's standards of biopics than anything that is well made or worthwhile. From a stiff progression to skimping out on achievements far greater than having a powerful voice, this doesn't pay tribute to the consequential efforts Aretha Franklin went through, nor does it deliver any satisfaction. With how poorly written this screenplay is, the sincerely blocky dialogue comes as no surprise. Failing to reach the audience on a personal level, this simply is nothing more than faulty storytelling. Pouring an immense amount of time into moments that are built with significance but correspond with minor resolutions, the themes this was going for needed a sturdier plot to showcase them. Having conflicts that deserved more time for their consequences to play out on screen, shying away from the gritty truths that are incorporated within her life, and mostly flaunting all the unsatisfying moments within the songs that could have been included, there is little within this that's necessary. While having the sole positive of this film be the remarkable musical talent of Jennifer Hudson, it coincides with a mediocre performance and a displeasing life story. 5/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 5/10
|
Nine Days:
Storyline:
A reclusive man conducts a series of interviews with human souls for a chance to be born. Simply having a lack of words that deserve the title of describing the purpose of this film, manifesting a forthright representation of life, Nine Days encapsulates a truthfully touching theme that films nowadays miss out on. Integrating a beautiful and quite frankly attentive meaning, the heartfelt moments aren't explicitly stated, rather are worked for later in the story. Sincerely taking its time to get its feet on the ground, it becomes worthwhile once you understand the importance the development was leading to; sticking through till the end, these scenes linger well after it's over. Using the alertness of the viewer to its advantage, the fiction this depicts isn't far from reality in terms of the way it's taken. With deeper meanings than what is flatly played on paper, this proves to have wit within its mesmerizing concepts. Though this has a clear and straightforward direction, it is something that wouldn't get a re-watch. Without a doubt a tearjerker, while this is something that I am glad to have watched, this slow-burn raw emotion is too heavy to continuously get a rise out of the audience each time. 8/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 6.5/10
|
Midnight in Paris:
Storyline:
While on a trip to Paris with his fiancée's family, a nostalgic screenwriter finds himself mysteriously going back to the 1920s every day at midnight. Considering Midnight in Paris acts upon the very idea that centers around finding yourself and the themes that naturally come with it, although dramatic, it's unimaginative. Embodying true-to-life conceptions isn't enough to save the overly flaunting storytelling which included an extended intro, a foreseeable script, and not to mention, thinking it's bigger than it is. Howbeit, Owen Wilson's presence delivers a dictated control on the progression of the story. Taking the initiative to put the audience in his shoes based on his scrupulous performance, he showcases his talent lies in more things than comedy. Being the epitome of a Woody Allen film, down to the score and dialogue, it just feels like the same thing every time but in a different setting. Becoming too structured to let yourself simply enjoy the fantasy and likewise, too careless to be a down-to-earth concept, this in all has conflicting perceptions; while arguably the purpose of the film, it rather takes aback what a powerful notion it could have been. 5/10
6/10
|
The Outpost:
Storyline:
A small team of U.S. soldiers battle against hundreds of Taliban fighters in Afghanistan. For a war film based on a true story, you would expect much better than this mediocre, forced content. While the concept and real-life heroes this brings to light are interesting, the presentation didn't do enough to make it hit home. By poorly introducing characters, there's not one that stands out. Having everyone blur together, the conflicts that arise become more confusing than anticipating, as no one or thing is distinct. Furthermore, sticking out till the end, no matter how difficult it may be, the unfulfilling finale is as lifeless as its characters who play a part in it. Not to mention the simply bad CGI that feels more like an 8th-grade special effects class than anything professional, the progression is strained. Enforcing a dictated turn of events, this lacks the structure for something formal and the creativity for something monumental. In combination with an overwhelming and unfitting score, the mismatched aspects create friction that is too prominent to make this notable. 5/10
5/10
|
Stillwater:
Storyline:
A father travels from Oklahoma to France to help his estranged daughter, who is in prison for a murder she claims she didn't commit. Forcing the audience into a blah concept, there isn’t the daring plotline that is needed to spark the progression. Seeing this story countless times, the uninspiring turn of events is too bland and familiar to be anything concrete. Acting upon lifeless performances and their corresponding predictable character arcs are not particularly engaging. Missing the point on the devastating lows and having a nonexistent satisfaction from the highs, this tries to be sentimental on angles that are presented wrong. As well as an artsy and full circle theme transferred at the end, it was out of pocket within the development. Testing the waters on presenting what it thinks it should be rather than a fitting resolution only heightens the misconception it has for itself. Though it takes effort to find the minuscule worthwhile features this brings to the table, these strands may distinguish the story but are so patchy that they become disputable. While they're incredibly cinematic and depict the uncanny emotions that have the power to resonate, the entire film should have done the same. With a shortcoming in having these moments persuade the direction of the film, Stillwater falls into an aimless path of disappointing its viewers. 5/10
5/10
|
Hell or High Water:
Storyline:
A divorced father and his ex-con older brother resort to a desperate scheme to save their family's ranch in West Texas. Instantly placing you into an adrenaline-pumping whirlwind of emotions setting, Hell or High water captures a drawing turn of events. Achieving what it was set to do and nothing more within its run time, although carrying out some strong aspects, the majority of this film feels unfinished. With a quite depicting directorial eye, there is little that doesn't get described. The immensely raw emotions are without a doubt embedded within the audience by not only showcasing the most prominent moments through character arcs but casting utterly spot-on performances. Never becoming scripted or rigid, this flows by the easy-going nature with anticipation. Be that as it may, no matter how true the portrayals become or how clear and definitive the directing is, this needs originality. Feeling as if the concept is rooted from any other film in the genre, the climax nor the theme resonate. Even with a pleasant execution of bringing this storytelling closer to the viewers, it can't completely solve it not being on the same level in its core; having something missing, the discontinuous notion this reveals makes it something decent instead of something great. 7.5/10
7.5/10
|
The Green Knight:
Storyline:
A fantasy re-telling of the medieval story of Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. The Green Knight undoubtedly captures a raw form of emotion that's delivered from the defining and authoritative performance of Dev Patel. However, even with his pure dedication and quite frankly the backbone to hold the unsteady editing together, there isn't enough substance for everything to cohesively stick. Acting on a coming-of-age story that holds many truths, the simplistic theme is developed within intricate storytelling. Proving to be in-depth and showcasing concepts that can be interpreted in many ways, the tasteful directorial eye depicts a cultured feeling. Yet when push comes to shove, this film takes off on a quest that’s too odd and confusing for the everyday watcher who is not an active fan of the poem. Becoming too profound in areas leaves you feeling neither positive nor negative over the execution of the uncanny subject matter. Even ending with a strong-willed finale, it can't wrap up the undecided notion this delivers. Feeling quite skeptical over how to react, there aren't enough that's interrelated to keep you engaged throughout, to rewatch, or to recommend. 6/10
4/10
|
Outlaw King:
Storyline:
Robert the Bruce used cunning and bravery to defeat the much larger and better equipped occupying English army. While this concept and the true story have been adapted into too many productions to count, it's safe to say this is not worth the time. Dragging out its runtime to feel longer than what it is, featuring a weak portrayal and becoming quite confusing for the average watcher, Outlaw King thinks it's exciting and melodramatic, but rather is a lengthy dawdle of time. With that said, this features a crisp and clear outline for what it wants to describe. Dictating every movement with precisely controlled directing, this is visually cinematic. Going hand in hand with the effortless flow of the cinematography, this attracts your attention. However, even with the enticing, complimentary score and costumes, this lacks the emphasis on the importance of the character. Undergoing no relevance of the relationships, connections, and entire development side of the film, it's missing key details in every moment. While the action and battles may be entertaining along with a decisive directorial tone, the rest is complicated and unclear. 5/10
5/10
|
The Little Things:
Storyline:
A Deputy Sheriff is sent to Los Angeles for what should have been a quick assignment. Instead, he becomes embroiled in the search for a serial killer who is terrorizing the city. Even with a stellar cast that is incredibly talented, surprisingly enough, only their names on paper are what this film has going for it. Seeing better work from everyone involved, having a truly boring turn of events, and an even more predictable plot twist, The Little Things is just another film that gets a view only from its star-power. Having no control over what was happening and how it all intertwined, there is nothing prominent that stands out. With the usual mediocre protagonist who has a "telling" character arc (which spoiler alert: it's not), there's very little this has to offer to keep you involved. Providing a meh story, it's hard to say it's passable, as it is the average concept, just with poor execution. Trying to come full circle with a theme that is written in between the lines with scarce details would have been interesting if there was a drive for information as the viewer. While this becomes tedious and unlively, it doesn't deserve the afterthought that the film was wanting. 3/10
3/10
|
Zola:
Storyline:
Zola is seduced into a weekend of stripping -- but the trip becomes a sleepless 48-hour odyssey involving a nefarious friend, her pimp, and her idiot boyfriend. Frankly, not knowing what you're up against regarding Zola makes this quite a divulgence - depicting an engrossing story that keeps you on your toes yet questions your morals makes for an eventful ride. Given the storytelling makes a statement, it felt unfinished. Having a clear and direct tone throughout the majority of the story, the last act is wistfully thrown together to leave on an artistic and monumental note, which in turn, is too abrupt and sudden to make an impact. Still and all, this is as tasteful as it gets. Outlining stereotypes and cliches by the outstanding performances, the moral of the story is clear by the devoted cast. While this is sadly the reality for some and highlights the grey area that doesn't get into the limelight, the idea was there, but the execution went wrong. Trying to be too stylish for a plot that is gritty and course, the two clash instead of blending. 5.5/10
5.5/10
|
Fatherhood:
Storyline:
A father brings up his baby girl as a single dad after the unexpected death of his wife who died a day after their daughter's birth. Despite this heavily forced production failing to make a seasoned concept entertaining, Fatherhood has no natural aspects to save its false portrayal of "real life". Given this is just funny enough to keep you watching, that by no means makes it funny. Being a congenial idea on paper, transferring over to the big screen does nothing but dull up an already established bland concept. Missing the much-needed, and truthfully the make or break for this story, chemistry, and style, this becomes hard to get through and makes it not recommendable. The icing on the cake, however, comes only from the non-original theme not being big enough. Having the predictable and sincerely boring hardships to overcome, makes for the character arcs to be nothing close to satisfying. While the effort was clear to make this something spectacularly good for what it's worth, there are hundreds of others just like it - if not better - that will keep you entertained and might actually make you smile. 4/10
4/10
|
Double Jeopardy:
Storyline:
A woman framed for her husband's murder suspects he is still alive; as she has already been tried for the crime, she can't be re-prosecuted if she finds and kills him. Despite Double Jeopardy's deeply rooted corny nature, it has a consistent flow that is matched by the loyal plot. Knowing it isn't set up for anything besides a predictable ride, this stays within its limits and creates an intriguing film for what it's worth. Certainly having its fair share of plot holes that don't go unnoticed, they rather are not worth the energy to figure out. While it's apparent there could have been more development and moments that deserved more time diving into, the focus of attention was driven and concentrated. However, this is truly an underrated production. Although not everything is in line, the carefree performances and effortless progression make this an eventful watch that changes the pace of films that can easily blur together; this is by no means a must-see top 10 type of film, instead, you know what you're in for with an entertaining, decent time passer. 6.5/10
6.5/10
|
In The Heights:
Storyline:
A film version of the Broadway musical in which Usnavi, a sympathetic New York bodega owner, saves every penny every day as he imagines and sings about a better life. While I can't relate to being an active fan/follower of Lin-Manuel Miranda and his work, that is about 95% of the purpose and enjoyment that this film offers. By no means is In The Heights a bad film, rather it lacks the factor that allows all viewers (non-fans and fans alike) to enjoy it. However, this was exceedingly long and drawn out. Throwing in one thing after another, the plot gets out of control. Adding too many characters, subplots, and jumping between them, there was too much going on to follow. Given the runtime went past its long-overdue limits of a modest timestamp, it was simply disorganized in doing so. Disregarding the poor storytelling and construction, the pronounced talent included was astounding. Even with a rocky presentation and editing of it all, the choreography still shines from its dedicated performances and mesmerizing chemistry. Yet, while this is something that can be appreciated, it isn’t anything that is recommendable. 7/10
4/10
|
Those Who Wish Me Dead:
Storyline:
A murder witness finds himself pursued by assassins in the Montana wilderness with a survival expert tasked with protecting him. Becoming nothing more than an easily forgettable film, Those Who Wish Me Dead has the drive of a thriller, but with an absence of the much-needed information to go with it, it turns into a messy waste of time. Failing to tell the story compellingly, the elongated conflict and resolution take their sweet time, resulting in a boring progression. Whether it's flashbacks or the gap of details that coincide, the execution of the "mystery protagonist" is as flat and wooden as one can get. Basing the protagonist - and the entire film for that matter - off a quite exceedingly predictable idea leaves no room for twists or creativity. Which, as one could guess, makes for an unsatisfying climax and mostly an uneventful watch. Furthermore, depicting more and more wildly unrealistic instances throughout, the unreasonable subject matter falls into the same category as the dull characters and poorly written plot: slow, overused concepts driven from a colorless commonplace. 3/10
3/10
|
Shot Caller:
Storyline:
A newly released prisoner is ordered by his gang to orchestrate a major crime. Having a simplistic but sophisticated tone with a non-linear storyline perfectly sets up the anticipation as more information is thrown together as time goes on. Consisting of a bold protagonist, this under-the-radar prison story is distressing and attention-holding. While this type of plot has been seen in many formats, Shot Caller constructs effortless schematic pieces that make this unsettling, engrossing watch. Being a low-budget film, there wouldn't be much indication of it due to the fact each aspect was executed and dedicated to its purpose. Primarily, the timeline and editing beautifully deliver the satisfaction of a non-stop and quick-witted theme. Intertwining the conflicts with development, the pace picks up and never stops. Furthermore, the gripping lead performance from Nikolaj Coster-Waldau takes this up a notch. Definitively dictating the course of the film, his never-ending, candid emotion generates a raw individual that develops onscreen. This film is not perfect, yet it is better than what it was supposed to be worth and is originally something different than the everyday film. Having much to offer, this is worth the time and deserves more love. 7.5/10
7.5/10
|
Clouds:
Storyline:
High school teen, Zach Sobiech, has been diagnosed with terminal cancer. With the time he has left, he records the inspirational song Clouds. This unavoidably comes with heartbreak, but the powerful and encouraging theme makes the sadness worthwhile. With tears shed, Clouds shines a light on an inspirational and optimistic individual who's silver lining overtakes the somewhat shaky film. While the protagonist was rather believable, that comes with more generosity than truth. Across the board, filled with mediocre performances and dull dialogue bogs down the authentic situations this portrays. The film as a whole had issues like these in just about every aspect, such as an accurate representation of kids this age, setting, costumes, personality, etc., yet screws up in giving them unfitting dialogue and lightweight actors, resulting in an even amount of positive and negative things in any area. On the contrary, even with a not so engrossing cast, the soundtrack was involving. Having hits that are easily catchy and notable, the themes yet again are transferred in the music, come full circle, and are obviously where the talents of the cast are placed. All in all, while some things felt falsely constructed rather than anything realistically compelling, the important true story this showcases should be in the public eye. 6.5/10
7.5/10
|
Seven (Se7en):
Storyline:
Two detectives, a veteran, and a rookie hunt a serial killer who uses the seven deadly sins as his motive. Being one of my favorite films for good reason, this film doesn't fail to provide an involving storyline, a problematic antagonist, and a speechless finale. Seven not only keeps you on your toes up until its final moments on screen but does so in a thrilling and cinematic way. Being one of the most elegantly written films within the Crime/Mystery genre, this develops the fear and voids within the protagonists first, among other things, to transfer the gripping unsettlement onto the audience. Furthermore, pushing the antsy and unsettling subject matter of not having a face to the name of the antagonist, the conflict is truthfully unable to be put into words, as the emotions are as genuine as one could think to construct. As for the performances, while no one outshines the other, the sincere and utterly profound dedication from everyone involved is clear. Proceeding throughout the film to showcase each aspect one has provided within the story, the eventful and unpredictable ride this film takes the audience on is unlike anything else. All in all, this film is worth the time. Though quite a dark subject and requires your full attention, this may be gritty but is an unforeseeable and thrilling watch. 8.5/10
8.5/10
|
Law Abiding Citizen:
Storyline:
A good man has to live with the fact that his wife and daughters killers got away with the broken legal system; to pay the consequences, he offers a deal to the leading prosecutor. Featuring a reasonably crazy plot without becoming questionable takes this one-thought-after-another type of storyline to a realistic level. While this felt like quite an impulsive take on a familiar idea, it executes by holding the audience's attention even when becoming cheesy or overpowering at times. Slightly overdoing the plot twists gets the better of the film. Genuinely providing a shocking turn of events gets you invested within the film, but sometimes enough is enough and that is a concept this didn't achieve; however, it still gets the job done. Leading up to a satisfying climax, Law Abiding Citizen is more than what it cracks up to be. This doesn't deserve all the love in the world but is hated on to a greater extent than even I would give. Despite stripped-down performances and an unreasonable finale, you know what you're getting yourself into and it conveys the edge of your seat entertainment that is expected within. 5/10
6.5/10
|
The Breakfast Club:
Storyline:
A group of five different social class teens end up spending the entire Saturday in detention and see each other a little differently after the day. Although undeniably a cult classic, which I would like to classify as such, this does have its problems. While this is a great BAM! film and overall a must-see, I wouldn't classify it as one of my favorites. Like many other 80s films, this era produced a bunch of poorly produced storylines. Really having no direction within the plot, the course this took was incredibly rocky and didn't take a clear path. Being foreseeable and exceedingly cheesy, although quite entertaining, it has no depth behind it, as it feels way too familiar. Admittedly, because this is made out to be what it is today and is so popular for cult classic reasons, that definitely has an effect on my opinion now. As I've said before, the second things get overhyped and too mainstreamed, sometimes it makes a film lose its appeal. However, that doesn't mean this is bad or not worth the watch, rather I wish it just wasn't treated in such a high light as it is. All in all, The Breakfast Club can be enjoyable for anyone, no matter who you are. Featuring a cheesy, but important life lesson, this is still relevant in today's time even if its predictable along the way. 6/10
8/10
|
The Meyerowitz Stories:
Storyline:
The adult children of Harold Meyerowitz reunite when he is admitted into the hospital. At first glance, this film can slip under the radar when it deserves more recognition. Although with that in mind, this isn't perfect, has its bumps along the way, and could have done more with what it had. Yet, thrives with its raw development and a different concept that separates itself. With an acquired sense of humor, it grows on you once you learn the characters and relate at one point or another. Complimented by cunning performances, everyone involved depicted some of the most individualized characters that are easy to appreciate. The realistic adaptations this film provides on a whole were incredibly lifelike, as mentioned, yet failed in its execution of the story. Consisting of breathtaking moments of pure, utter emotion, were followed by a messy string of chaotic scenes. Struggling to even the plane to create a cohesive story resulted in the everyday entertainment value for this film to go down. While stylistically, I appreciate plenty of outstanding aspects this provides, but because of the following elements, the divided feelings this produces leaves me at an uncertain viewpoint. On one hand, there's much to value, while at the same time, to many this wouldn't come as a very easy, enjoyable watch. 6.5/10
5.5/10
|
Arkansas:
Storyline:
Low-level drug criminals, Kyle and Swin have never met their boss, but a series of bad events put them on a track right toward him. This film had so many problems and failed because of the combination of it all. Taking too many aspects from other films, this never grasped the concept of making it its own; this tried to do too many familiar aspects in Hollywood and lost its groundings in the meantime. The frequent continuity issues made for an unplanned plot. While I will say that I am prone to finding problems inside plots I do not enjoy, the careless and unorganized story was a flop. This, filled with a messy orientation of details, there was not only confusion with the numerous plot holes but had a lack of a draw factor throughout its entire screen time. On a lighter note, though thrown in at awkward times, the actual gist and main points of the storyline was a creative idea. While it didn't work in anyone's favor, as it fell into the category of predictability and the audience losing interest, I understood the thought behind it all. A few scenes were visually pleasing and got the point across well, but that's barely enough to mention as it is. All in all, this is not a must see by any means. 4/10
4/10
|
The Outsiders:
Storyline:
This is a coming of age story about two high school rivalry gangs, the Greasers and the Socials. When a fight turns bad, the two groups have to come to social standing. Although the last time I had seen this was about seven years ago, wholeheartedly, never would I have remembered JUST how corny this is. Truly, beyond what words can describe, this is a special case of being so cheesy it is incredibly difficult to watch, yet at the same time, so compelling it's hard to take your eyes off. The storyline is incredibly foreseeable, even to the point of predicting the next line. While this is true and without a doubt becomes comical, that never changes how enjoyable this is. Each character is relatable in one way or another and finds a way to connect with the audience. While I will always find a way to enjoy this film, I can admit that the level of how cheesy this is is off the charts. Because of this, the everyday watcher might not find all the positives in this right away but is a sentimental, cheesy classic for a reason. 5/10
6.5/10
|
The Usual Suspects:
Storyline:
Conman, Verbal is the only one left of his team when their job goes bad and ends up in an explosion. He convinces the police about the real man behind it all, Keyser Soze. This is truly one of my favorite films, as each time I see it, I like it more. The amount of suspense throughout this story is unlike anything else. Having no clue as to what the truth is, this takes the audience on a whirlwind of emotions, never knowing who is who. Eventually, this comes around to a film with a great plot twist, to which you notice new things with each watch. Everyone across the board had humorous and individualized personalities that sparked conflicts and helped create the progression of it all. The tone goes hand in hand with this as well, as there undeniably is an uneasy feeling at any given time, but the source of it is the aspect that no one knows. This film is genuinely one of the most captivating pictures. Never missing a beat, this strives with great development, solid organization of details, and of course, the ending. 8.5/10
8.5/10
|
Escape From Alcatraz:
Storyline:
Frank Morris is sent to a maximum secured prison, Alcatraz to serve the rest of his life sentence as he has escaped from numerous prisons. Per usual, Clint Eastwood provides a solid protagonist that the audience can rely on within the story. As far as the story specifically, I enjoyed the make-up of the film, and especially when something is true, it makes it easier to relate to. However, my issues lie toward the story altogether, as I wish the film could have left a bigger impact. The fact that this had actually happened in real life is crazy to wrap your head around, as still to this day it is an unsolved mystery. Though no one will really know what is true, specific details, and so on regarding this story, this felt very genuine and as practical as it could be. With that in mind, I wish the ending or throughout the last act, a bigger message could resonate with the audience. It left the end abruptly and felt as if it abandoned the entire story that was developed. Even so, this is truly the biggest thing that was bothersome; it doesn't destroy the wild real life story this actually is, but is a letdown. 7/10
7/10
|
To the Bone:
Storyline:
20-year-old Ellen is struggling with her eating disorder of being anorexic. After numerous attempts to get better, nothing seems to be working, until her family puts her in a group home with a non-traditional doctor. This is not, by any means, a very watchable film. This is not because of the uncomfortable subject matter that it includes, instead of the lack of finding its voice throughout its story. This film focuses on an eating disorder that doesn't get showcased throughout Hollywood enough but stumbles upon missed opportunities of great character development and unique life meanings. Lily Collins' dedication to this role deserves to be praised entirely. Although her physical change is substantial and incredibly realistic, her performance and mannerisms are just as important. She was the steady piece within the film that the plot relies on; although there were some hiccups within the story, she never fails to provide a candid adaptation. The idea of this story had the right thought in mind, yet there were just too many aspects thrown onto the viewer for this to truly resonate with the audience. Overall, the film was too chaotic and messy, trying to provide too many controversial topics at once that the real meanings couldn't shine. Rating: 6/10 |
Lady Bird:
Storyline:
A high schooler maintains a tough relationship with her mother while maintaining a social lifestyle that she is faking through her peers. Upon hearing the hype that goes along with this story, partially getting higher hopes than need be is my doing. That being said, I appreciate Greta Gerwig and how she has this effortless flow and compelling nature to her adaptations, yet I can't take all the blame when it comes to this film failing as a whole. Though there is this problematic relationship that is the center of attention and driving the entire story, over time it becomes sort of a tiring act that is losing its draw that originally it had. It becomes repetitive in the sense where nothing good or bad will come from it, just a continuous loop. The one thing I enjoyed about this is the anticipation that this story was leading to. Slowly ticking away to the inevitable climax, it kept the suspense to keep me intrigued. Then, sure enough, once I like something it all has to get destroyed. The finale crushed the development that the entire film was leading up to. I’m very upset that it ended the way it had. This could have gone for more of a powerful aspect by not varying from what this centered around; rather it tried to do more than what it could and ruined the hardship it depended on. Rating: 6.5/10 |
The Goldfinch:
Storyline:
13-year-old Theo Decker is with his mother when she is killed in a bombing at an art museum. The only thing he has left of her is a beloved painting he stole. This film is not easily entertainable, yet is something that can be appreciated. This features many elements that are just classy and formal, which truly represent a cinematic feeling. This includes clear directing and crisp editing to embody the struggles of the protagonist at any age. Though, this can't push the film on a whole to provide a truly captivating or recommendable film. Running just about two and a half hours, this film was unendingly long. This could have been summed up easily in half the time and still expressed the same meanings. It was filled with the aimless progression of scenes and details that didn't need to be included to be impactful. The child acting was very poor, and this is quite substantial as well since it took up a good section of the plot. While they were extremely well cast as far as their appearance (they truly looked like a younger version of the adult actors) that doesn't change the fact that their performances felt scripted and rigid. While something can be said for taking a different approach to acknowledge the visually pleasing and well-created characteristics, this failed to grasp my attention or to hold it throughout. This acted as the defeat of the film and ultimately hinders its enjoyment. Rating: 6/10 |
Deliverance:
Storyline:
Four friends take a trip canoeing in Georgia. Once one the river, things take an unexpected turn when they are not welcomed by the people in the area. This film is incredibly powerful, even on today's terms. Featuring scenes that were once not done in this time frame and filling them with interactions that are memorable and unforgettable because of what they entail. The progression of the story was done effortlessly. While the beginning sequence truly has no meaning for development, it goes to show how this situation could happen to anyone, as the entire film includes small moments like these to humanize these characters and show how they are just as real as anyone else. The performances fit right within this as well. No matter if something was anticipating, slow or quiet, this film acted on the stellar casting that makes up substantial character development. Overall, this film has numerous appreciable aspects that film lovers can find a way to enjoy and acknowledge. However, though this is a solid film, more intense, edge-of-your-seat, powerful moments could have been included to make this film take the extra step in making this film a must-see for all. Rating: 7/10 |
The Social Network:
Storyline:
As a Harvard student, Mark Zuckerberg creates the social network, Facebook. He gets sued by twins who claim he stole their idea, as well as his former friend and co-founder of the company. The opening scene of this film, in the grand scheme of things, is virtually pointless. Honestly, it has no purpose and/or relevance to the rest of the film, yet, I loved it. From the first image that is put on screen, it captivates the audience in getting to the know the protagonist in a kind of clueless story, which all comes together at the end. The editing/writing of this film was done perfectly. Jumping in between present-day and the specific memories that make up the creation of Facebook, it gives the audience a feel for everyone who was involved. The sound within this film is not normally the typical choice for this type of film. However, it was incredibly powerful at all times and created the tone throughout the story. Being extremely intense and overpowering at times, it fits hand-in-hand with the sequencing of the story as it goes back in forth through time. Although I can admit that this has a slow progression and a few times it can get ahead of itself by trying to accomplish too many things at once, this is an incredibly compelling film that provides a solid watch. Rating: 8/10 |
Beautiful Boy:
Storyline:
A seemingly put-together teenager, Nicolas Sheff is addicted to meth. His father does everything he can to save him, as Nic goes through relapse, withdrawal and the effects of his actions. The opening scene of the film didn't grasp my attention the way it should have, which is a perfect way to explain the rest of the film - the sequencing of scenes and organization of details within them play a prominent role in creating a repetitive storyline that doesn't hook the audience. Considering this is a true story and takes an active part in telling the corruption drugs cause on everyone involved with the user, it doesn't provide the satisfying, life-lesson we are expecting. The repetition of Nic relapsing and his chronic behavior is depicting the real-life scenarios, however, consisting of the same dialogue, mannerisms, and encounters within them, they become too scripted to show that underlying meaning. Timothee Chalamet is one of the most brilliant actors of this generation. This adaptation shows his immense range as he utterly captures the raw, broken form that's needed for a character such as this. A few scenes, in particular, he leaves the audience speechless with an immense dedication that is nowhere near questionable. Though this has its flaws and isn't the most solid film that is recommendable, there still is an appreciation of the incredible performances and the quite creative, stylistic directing that calls attention upon itself. Rating: 6.5/10 |
Goodfellas:
Storyline:
A young man grows up in the mob, working his way through the ranks. Loving his life of money and luxury, after making a few mistakes, paranoia sets in. This film is genuinely one of the most captivating storylines. Never having a dull moment, everything shown on screen plays a purpose in creating the most authentic picture possible. Casting utterly amazing lead performances leads to characters that are just as compelling as the entire film. They create an incredibly personable vibe to an anticipating story and put themselves on a realistic standpoint with the audience. Especially featuring empathetic narration, it was perfectly on cue and sticks with the audience. The soundtrack and editing were phenomenal. Never missing a beat, there was never a choice that didn't feel fitting. Having both high adrenaline and mellow characteristics, there is an unspoken feeling to this effortless and natural progression. The sound/music is unmatched when it comes to how easily it complements the flow of the story. This hands down is a superb film in terms of storytelling. The lighting and shot composition of each scene are enough to appreciate this film on its own, let alone the other countless remarkable aspects this brings to the table. Rating: 9/10 |
Ray:
Storyline:
Telling the story behind the legendary Ray Charles' and his upbringing. This biopic shows him losing his sight, struggling with drugs and infidelity throughout his career. Jamie Foxx created a candidly remarkable performance. He was utterly convincing with both his vocals and mannerisms that there wasn’t the slightest doubt in my mind that he wasn't Ray Charles himself. His talent uplifted and shined within the film and frankly provided the storyline with the substance it needed. However, it was unnecessarily long. It was dragged along for no reason other than it wants to push its drama and emotion on the viewer. This was virtually not essential and could have been summed up in an hour less. Foxx's performance was enough to be heart wrenching, yet it was hindered from the films' excessive screen time. Including flashbacks was undeniably important to the storyline, but were out of place and not in the same mindset as the rest of the film. Having an unspoken but distinguishable tone to the story in present-day and a completely other insinuated tone for the flashbacks; the two were not linked as properly as they should have been. As much as I am here to appreciate Foxx's raw adaptation, it could have been so much stronger with a better basis of the story. This is 100% worth the watch but had more potential with such a stellar individual. Rating: 7.5/10 |
Richard Jewell:
Storyline:
Richard Jewell, a security guard for the 1996 Atlanta Olympics was falsely accused of being the terrorist who set off the bomb. This film on a whole included personable characters that all were different enough to separate themselves from each other but also their importance to the storyline. This raw adaptation of true events was incredibly interesting and holds your interest throughout. Going hand in hand with focused directing, the in-shoe feeling was perfectly depicted. By having a comedic script it lessens the draining feeling of a story such as this. The same information and comprehension come from it, yet it provided a film that makes the audience laugh during hard times, which is how they portrayed Jewell's personality; he was a good guy in a bad situation, and they wanted to make sure it was known, as he was in a bad light for no reason. That being said, although the performances were great, the script added a lighter feeling and it was informative, my issue with this film is it didn't do enough. While this film is very accurate to the true events and follows them as closely as possible, there never was a definite answer and/or finale to the anticipating story. Facts of real-life Jewell (that were pretty substantial) in which I was needing to feel satisfied only came with post-film research. Having such an involving story with positive aspects, it made it less impactful, as it felt like the only part that was underdeveloped. Rating: 6.5/10 |
Starred Up:
Storyline:
A troubled teenager is transferred to the same prison as his violent father. While this film may not be well-known, it well worth the time to see. Bringing to the table a sophisticated story that can hold its own among other dramas. This storyline offers just the right amount of detail to prolong the story while not losing its intensity. The absence of information was perfectly done, as there is truly no explanation or background given. The story lives in prison and is more than enough to get invested. Truly a stellar lead performance from Jack O'Connell. He depicted an individual that the audience relates with but doesn’t fully understand. He is flawed and has issues, though he is still a raw individual who is conflicted. The supporting characters were just as important. They didn't try to overtake the show but were relevant when shown to provide depth within the plot. The directing focus on a realistic point of view, creating a personal feeling of an outsider. Although the audience can feel intertwined within the story, we get to see different aspects from multiple characters involved, making a large impact. This definitely is an under the radar story that deserves much more attention. Though it can feel heavy and slow at times, that adds to the realistic and personable mindset from the creators, and once you get through that, you're invested in it. Rating: 8/10 |
Lucky Number Slevin:
Storyline:
Slevin gets mistaken for someone else and thrown in the mix of a battle between two crime lords. He follows what they say to stay alive. This film not only provides an edge of your seat watch, but showcases the power absence of information has. Knowing just as much as the protagonist, the audience gets a feel for a shady situation though has no information until the end. The storyline creates something that is an easy watch and keeps the audience on their toes, but unknowingly shows plot twist in the second act. While it still is incredibly intriguing, it takes the edge off just enough to where it's not as intriguing. Though the editing, especially the beginning sequence, definitely provided a suitable tone, some spots became sloppy. Having plenty of jump cuts within moments that felt unintentional, it put a slight block on the progression. Nevertheless, the great organization and sequencing of ideas/thoughts truly did overtake this fault. The performances were strong from everyone involved. Incorporating comedic characteristics made for some individuals to get a tad corny, yet the serious persona taken balances the grit of their characters. Overall, slipping under the radar, this film might not be a top priority, but it is entertaining and shows something different than everything nowadays. Rating: 7/10 |
Little Women:
Storyline:
The March sisters in the mid-19th-century deal with hardships, financial struggles, and equality while growing up. Personally, for me seeing the newest adaptation before this, it almost ruined it for me in a sense. Though this film might have come first, I enjoyed the most recent film more than this and was having a hard time with these different versions that were very similar. The lack of representing something authentic was the downfall of this film. On a whole, no characters/struggles were relatable, let alone believable. The dialogue was stiff, the relationship-building felt scripted and the emotional scenes were everything but that. There was an unspoken notion that it was make-believe from the start; it never grasped my interest and continued down an unexciting path. The sequence of the story was choppy. Poorly placing scenes that were once useful resulted in the incorporation of not so smooth production. I don’t know if it was as big of a deal to others, but Amy’s actress swap was not seamless. Indicating a time change, a completely different actress was not necessary. Halting the progression of the film, having her be the one change in the entire story, it only heightens the unrelatable feeling from the story. This film only made me enjoy the newest version more and recognize the work that was put into it. Honestly, I don't know why it has received the appreciation it has, as it's truly not deserving of it. Rating: 3/10 |
The Diving Bell and the Butterfly:
Storyline:
Jean-Do, a 42-year-old magazine editor has a stroke which causes him to have Locked-In Syndrome - leaving him paralyzed and only able to speak through blinking his eye. Although I am not one to necessarily watch foreign films, this was shockingly better than I had expected. Regardless of the few problems throughout its course, it’s truly thought-provoking and tear-wrenching. The point of view shots used as Jean-Do's perspective accurately depicts how confined and trapped the protagonist is feeling with his newly adopted lifestyle. I will say the beginning got carried away and used this element longer than I thought was needed, but it still conveys the same message. I wish there would have been more flashbacks showing the past life of the protagonist. When present, they were quick and explanatory of his previous life. It could have built his character up even more, as his come around was a fully appreciable arc. The narration played a viable role in both obtaining the audience's attention and giving the perspective of someone's thoughts that others are not able to hear. The raw form of all actors involved was remarkable, who were cohesive with the narrating, whether they could hear it in the scene or not. Rating: 8/10 |
Fruitvale Station:
Storyline:
Following the last day of Oscar Grant's life, a 22-year-old man, before he is fatefully killed by a police officer. This is undeniably a real-world problem that is upsetting, yet this film relies too heavily on its topic to produce a significant and well-made story. More instances than not, there were scripted interactions that were just not needed. Placing fake, made-up moments and characters to help signify the innocence of the protagonist did quite the opposite, actually, as nothing felt real. Inadequate screenwriting plays a part, yet again, in the struggle of this film. Laying it on the surface as far as touching on hard life conversations, but skipping over a final scene that had the power to create something incredibly heartfelt. More time could have been focused on the grit of this story rather than just the concept. Considering the low budget this was filmed with, the first and second acts shaky camera work felt more like a money issue rather than a stylistic choice. But, it quickly became intentional in the final act and it just wasn't working. Despite the negatives, Michael B. Jordan's raw adaptation was without a doubt something to acknowledge. Playing an individual who clearly has his issues and is working on becoming a better person; however, with all things considered, this isn't worth the watch. Rating: 4/10 |
Fight Club:
Storyline:
A man suffering from insomnia has his life change when he meets soap salesman, Tyler Durden. The two form an underground club where they fight other men. Truly, this is one of the most intriguing storylines created in the film world. Not only is it incredibly unpredictable, but it features an outstanding plot twist that is authentic and thought-provoking still to this day. Depicting an equally stellar performance from both Brad Pitt and Ed Norton. The two work cohesively together, creating something raw and easily effortless - the audience lives through their pain and empathizes with their emotions on a personal level. Featuring quite interesting editing and directing, this film took a risky route that is not mainstreamed with its style, yet was creative with its visuals. Having this appealing look, it was engaging at any given moment no matter what was happening. Though there was a recollecting ending, it doesn’t take away from the story. Being innovative with featuring multiple aspects in the labeled "drama" category, there were plenty of laughable, cringe-worthy and heartfelt moments that helped create this incomparable story. Rating: 9/10 |
Hotel Mumbai:
Storyline:
Based on the true event, a series of terrorist attacks happen in Mumbai. Trapped in a hotel among these terrorists, the civilians and workers have nowhere to go. Given this comes from an unfortunate true story, it doesn’t change the lack of originality in the progression or origin of the story. Consisting of an incredibly conventional storyline and unrealistic instances from the antagonists, this doesn’t provide an engaging or realistic story. I will admit, there were few touching moments that were exceedingly raw, sadly, there were only a few. While they were clearly shown, it wasn’t enough to carry the overwhelming amount of average and basic scenes that made up this film. I never felt on the same level with the characters, their fear and worry didn’t achieve the empathetic stance they were going for due to lack of development and consideration; It was hard to understand or relate to any emotions. Though I never lost interest in watching, I wasn’t satisfied with the film nor was I engaged in getting there. Ending quite abruptly, the film didn't seem to have a purpose. By not achieving a personal relationship with the viewer caused this to not be impactful. Rating: 5/10 |
Motherless Brooklyn:
Storyline:
Living with Tourette's syndrome, a private investigator sets out to find the killer of his boss. Achieving pleasing 1950s costumes and aesthetics, the representation of the characters within did not fall under the same accomplishment. With this aspect included, the film was filled with praisable characteristics done in not so fitting ways. Poor and inconsistent camera angles overtook the film. Beginning with certain focal points then jumping to others was done with no reason or relation to the story. Rooted from a deep productional issue, this created incoherence. Offering some intense music choices, it was edited dreadfully. The higher the anticipation meant the louder music. This led to the dialogue competing with the music, rather than the two complementing each other. The truly intriguing soundtrack was masked by inadequate execution. Due to the narration lacking in development and relevance throughout, the storyline was filled with issues from the beginning. Coming in at odd times and staying longer than needed became confusing as to what was actually happening. Having a fair share of holes and no explanation of details, there was nothing for the audience to rely on, as there was no objective at any point. Rating: 3/10 |
Just Mercy:
Storyline:
Brian Stevenson is a Harvard Law graduate that moved to Alabama to defend those who were wrongfully convicted and sentenced to death row. The script was the most prominent drawback of the film, as it never achieved the conversational aspect. Though everything that was being discussed was touching to the audience, it could have been more genuine, rather than it feeling so unnatural and artificially planned. Even with that, the actors did their best with what they had and still managed to establish characters. Opposing this, the storyline was straightforward. It introduced characters and their relevance, had a steady build up and gracefully moved each scene to the next. Exceeding a few minor plot holes and/or underdevelopment, they were not obvious and didn't alter the final product, which was a wholesome feeling. Despite consisting of a depressing subject, this wasn't a mood killer. While there were a decent amount of scenes that made you hold your breath and sit on the edge of your seat, it also found a way to target the right emotions to truly make the audience understand. Hooking me from the start, this film has an easy feel to it. Though it might include a well thought-out storyline and heart-wrenching moments, there were definitely some issues to go along with. Nevertheless, this is still an investing film that is worth the watch. Rating: 7/10 |
1917:
Storyline:
During WWI, two soldiers are given a mission to cross enemy territory and deliver orders to potentially save 1,600 lives. Given the high praise this is getting for its notable achievements (which is deserving), receiving the Best Drama Academy Award and an Oscar Nomination for Best Picture is a stretch. The directing changed the game in the world of film. Featuring some of the most personal, raw angles paired with long, extended shots, everything edited together was effortless and seamless. This created an in shoe feeling that is unlike anything I have seen in a war based film. Noticing the crisp and clear visuals is an understatement, as they were truly stellar. The cinematography was consistent and coherent throughout the story, creating a hearty and trouble-free flow to the film. As far as the performances, I enjoyed the lead, as he did his part in creating a solid piece to rely on while the story progressed, however, no one else felt true to their performance. I didn't believe any of the supporting characters as they were flat, not held in high enough regard to understand their character and poorly casted. This lead to a heavy feeling that only increased, losing its authenticity. Overall, this produced something that is original and creative to the film world. But, having a storyline consisting of something too similar to everything in its genre, non-believable characters and a few scenes that were blown out of proportion, it takes the rating down a notch. Rating: 7.5/10 |
Marriage Story:
Storyline:
A theater director and an actress go through a time consuming and stressful divorce on different sides of the country. Personally, I didn't think Netflix was capable of making a film so heart wrenching and moving as this. That in mind, no matter who was apart of this, it is truly something worth acknowledging. Judging from the synopsis, this is obviously a depressing story, and while I really found a way to enjoy it, I will say isn't for everyone. Going through waves of emotions focusing on different aspects from each character and connecting to a part of viewers that not every film can, it becomes an intense watch that is consuming. Both Adam Driver and Scarlett Johansson peaked in this film. Diving deep into their roles cracked an utterly raw performance that is unlike any other. Having a profound position in this emotional wrenching film, every line, whether it was heavy or upbeat, was effective and stirred the audience. The way the dialogue effortlessly made the film flow was remarkable. Not only featuring a story that is unfortunately relatable, it never felt forced in doing so. Taking each moment into heavy consideration, nothing went unsaid, even if it wasn't clearly stated. Ending on a touching and devastating note, it symbolizes the development and growth of individuals finding themselves and how sometimes things just don't work out, which has to be okay. Rating: 8/10 |
Uncut Gems:
Storyline:
Howard, a jewelry store owner makes a gamble of a lifetime that could make or break his career, family and everything he cares about. My expectations were set too high from no one but myself, which led to my immense disappointment. Though this could play into my overall opinion of this being a fail, it still doesn't change the obvious issues this featured. First things first, there is no way around acknowledging Adam Sandler's shockingly raw and realistic performance. Coming from an actor who you wouldn't expect this from, it makes his character even more powerful as every thing he did wasn't perfect, and his struggle/mess of a life became one with the audience. The music choice was definitely unique, as it included a soundtrack that isn't the usual route for this type of film, and added to the imperfect story, that being said, it was incredibly overpowering at all times. The idea of this was to increase the intensity of the plot, rather it consumed the dialogue and took away from Sandler. With poor and improper execution of an interesting element, something that could have increased the energy only ruined the vibe. One of the biggest faults for this film was the underdevelopment of the central idea. While there were scenes that could have been taken out and the story would have still flowed shows the vast amount of time there was to fulfill this dire need to the holes in the plot. Rating: 6/10 |
Little Women:
Storyline:
Following the journey of four sisters, Amy, Jo, Beth and Meg, all who have completely different dreams. Starting off and staying consistent throughout the film, there was a dim feeling to the story. Even so, that didn't bother the progression (although it was a slow film), it definitely set the tone with a mood that didn't always need to be that dreary. There were a few instances where the subject addressed the camera which rubbed off the wrong way. I like the idea regarding these scenes, but due to poor execution, using it too sparingly and in weird moments, it felt out of place. For the most part (excluding a few characters), the casting and character portrayals were precise. Having each performance fit their character to a tee, it felt as personal as possible. Including multiple heart wrenching moments that not only hit home, but truly felt unscripted. The most influential part of this film was the message it put across. While having a female driven, coming of age story this not only produced a practical idea, but it did it in an effortless way that didn't make it feel like it was being forced down my throat. Taking a slow course to get to its destination, while this is heartfelt and thought provoking, seeing this once is enough for me. Though this provides positive attributes, it’s overall bland and slow attire fails to massively separate or distinguish itself from any other film. Rating: 6.5/10 |
Bombshell:
Storyline:
Taking a look inside one of the biggest political and controversial media scandals and then women behind it. Though the subject at stake is something that’s well known, the details that were chosen and the way it was created did not click, to say the least. Having a storyline that jumped between concepts, facts and subplots, it became a jumbled mess of information which was incredibly confusing to follow. Not being able to enjoy the film and struggling to follow it was a major fall. Paired with underdeveloped situations and pointless scenes, it was obvious. The characters were extremely one dimensional. Not only were all the characters relying on their names to carry them along, but there was no inflection, relatability or a way to feel connected to them. This ultimately ruined the goal of the film, which was to truly feel the hardships and hurdles these individuals had gone through; instead, this only created something that powerless and insignificant. Overall, this is not worth the time to see in the theater or at home, as it was not an engaging watch. Having absolutely no substance, value or relevance to in world, this film was very pointless. Rating: 4/10 |
The Irishman:
Storyline:
In the 1950's, Frank Sheeran becomes one of the top hitmen in Pennsylvania, leading him to get involved with the Temster's and Jimmy Hoffa. This was highly anticipated and rated very high from critics, which possibly could have let me get my hopes up (which is never good for me), in addition to all the A-list names as well, it's fair to say that alone is enough to get views. Although everyone played their characters to the fullest, being as personable as can be without losing their power, it almost felt like everyone was trying to outshine each other. De Niro, Pacino, and Pesci have all been known for playing these kind of roles notably, no matter who is alongside them. Instead, this film I interpreted it the opposite, in which everyone wanted their performance to be the talks of the film- with that though, Pacino won. Having a run time of three hours and thirty minutes, it felt even longer than what it was. Though there was information that required more length within the story, there were times I was feeling the pain of sitting still, and it could have been shortened by an hour. The CGI of having characters look either younger/older was very inconsistent. On some it looked so realistic that I was questioning how on others it was so tacky. Having this vary, it started to become exceedingly noticeable. While this definitely has its faults, I would say it's still worth the watch, as overall it tells a compelling story and provides interesting characters. Rating: 6.5/10 |
Queen & Slim:
Storyline:
Queen and Slim's first date turns into a run from the cops when they are wrongfully convicted for a minor traffic violation and have to act in self defense. Judging from the trailer, it seemed like this touched upon subjects that not everyone can accurately or correctly depict without being too strong, and if I'm being honest, I was not expecting this to be decent in the least. However, this was beautifully done from everyone both in front of and behind the camera. I will say the beginning was off to a rough start. Having dry and boring dialogue between two characters that were brand new to the audience and each other, it clearly showed in a time consuming way. Be that as it may, it hit a point where you instantly became invested and physically a part of the story within a blink of an eye. The lead performances were outstanding. Never once did I believe emotions to be untrue, driving from strong investment and personable characters, they were effortlessly developed through such power and grace. Consistent with the storyline, they both provided a stable and grounded picture. Though a few scenes were very graphic and really didn't need to be in that manner, along with a couple pointless scenes, their compelling relationship outshined it all, creating more than one important life lessons we all should go by. Rating: 7.5/10 |
Dark Waters:
Storyline:
An attorney uncovers the hidden truth about a large company contaminating water, linking to several and increasing deaths. As he gets closer, he starts to risk everything he has. Because I already had a formed opinion (by not being the biggest fan of Mark Ruffalo) I am biased when it comes to this film. Having that in your mind, don't let it fool you when I go in depth on how terrible he actually was. Despite him having a southern accent half the time, his depiction and performance was incredibly scripted, which prevented me from being able to understand or empathize with him at any given time. Whether he was alone or alongside someone, even with maximum effort from the other actors, he stole the show in a weak way. The pacing was genuinely something else, as I was incredibly bored throughout the majority of the second and third act. I checked my watch multiple times and did not want to continue watching, as my interest was lost in the beginning. The amount of pointless and useless scenes this had to offer was absurd, starting from the very first one. Legitimately having no relevance or ties to any other part of the film, there were plenty of others that were noticeable as well. Rating: 3/10 |
Knives Out:
Storyline:
When a crime novelist suddenly dies on the night of his 85th birthday, a detective pieces together what really happened that night. Although I was really looking forward to this film, I think it might have gotten more hype than what it deserved, as I was slightly disappointed. It wasn't bad by any means, but wasn't an over-the-top stellar production. Aside from its A-list cast being enough to make money in the box office, this suspenseful whodunit was advertised and previewed in a way where it appealed to multiple people who like different genres. That being said, throughout the entire film I got a feeling that everyone involved knew it was going to make money, so their demeanor changed from trying to produce the best version of the film instead to simply entertaining the viewer. Though this was definitely not a bad route to go because it did hold my attention, it was a present feeling within the story. The script was slightly comedic in a dark manner, which worked really well with the cast and how everything (predictably) tied together in the end. Everyone truly fit their character and provided the steady performance that fit within the story, whether they had a large role or not. Beside the aspects that were a little shaky in this film, they were minor issues in the grand scheme of things, as this provided an intriguing and anticipating storyline, no matter how it got there. Rating: 7.5/10 |
Cool Hand Luke:
Storyline:
Luke Jackson is sentenced to two years in a Florida prison farm, but isn't the typical prisoner, as he doesn't follow the rules. Such a distinctive story, this is unlike anything I've ever seen. Taking a slow course to get to its final destination, it follows someone who is broken and is finding different ways to cope without the things he has in a cohesive way. Topping off with a crazy ending, this is something you will never see coming. While the dialogue might have been dry at times, the movements and actions of Paul Newman were enough to hold the film. Having numerous scenes that were brilliant in nature, which provided not only comedic aspects, but the bigger picture that makes you think about what was really at stake. Following a whole course of character development, the expansion of the protagonist was amazing. Between being put in terrible situations, thinking outside of the box and never giving up, he touched the crowd with such a raw and personal performance. The fact that this was made over 50 years ago just goes to show that you don't need over the top action sequences, multiple A-list actors or a huge budget to produce a stellar film. This is one of the best films I have seen recently. Rating: 8.5/10 |
El Camino: A Breaking Bad Movie
Storyline:
After Jessie is free from captivity, he is blamed for crimes he did not commit. In an effort to clear his name, he comes to terms with who he is now. Being a huge Breaking Bad fan, this wasn't really satisfying, as I was expecting more from the creators. While it had the same tone and humor, the point of the story was not there. Following the finale of the series, we all know that Jesse breaks free, which was a powerful way to end such a brilliant story. Taking place at the same scene, it just felt forced and unnecessary because we already knew and inferred that he went on with his life. Considering this is taking place without a change in time, but was made years later, the different appearances of the characters were obvious. Whether it was a change in weight or age, you would think there would be some time spent to fix such a noticeable factor. The performances, as always were great. Every character that came back was stellar, played their character spot on and are held just as highly as they were remembered. This felt like a bland, last episode to the series that just didn't need to be made. It doesn't go as far as ruining its name, instead leaves a bad taste in your mouth. Rating: 6/10 |
Joker:
Storyline:
Arthur Fleck is a failed comedian with a mental illness that has held him back his whole life. Not knowing where to go with his life, this film follows his path becoming the criminal mastermind known as the Joker. Something that has been done before in plenty of different ways almost had me hesitant to see the result following from a memorable performance. This is truly one of the best films I have seen in the box office recently. The storyline itself could sustain the film without any of the other excellent aspects it included. It followed and developed a character that was slowly cracking away throughout its course, building the suspense and having the audience nervously waiting for what would come next, which was the powerful climax we were waiting for. It hit a certain point to the plot that I just became speechless. Many brilliant scenes were piled together in a beautiful, coherent way. The last act of the film consumed the audience attention entirely. Joaquin Phoenix is breathtaking. Every move he made was remarkable by the way he was so broken and how he was discovering himself in his own raw and personable manner. He touched the audience with his performance and drew you closer as it progressed. This was a not so perfect, stellar film driven by an incredibly powerful lead performance, perfect character development and personal cinematography, directing, and soundtrack. Rating: 8.5/10 |
Ad Astra:
Storyline:
Roy McBride is the son and astronaut of a known hero, Cliff McBride who was lost in space 30 years ago. Following new information, he heads off to Neptune to uncover the truth. A truly compelling performance from Brad Pitt. His character depth and development throughout its course was captivating for the audience by showing his inner conflicts and loneliness, but struggling as to how to show it. While this is a space film and these films are always slow, this was extremely and overly slow in my opinion. The reason I was having such a hard time with the pacing is because of how it didn't flow seamlessly together. The action was thrown out at random times that wasn't fit in the moment and the drama aspects were carried out longer than they should have, which separated the audience from the story at times. That being said, while the action was placed at random times, it didn't mean it wasn't interesting, being realistic and with high intensity. The suspense kept me on my toes for the majority of the film even at down times. This father-son conflict storyline was a good choice which worked. Driven by a stellar lead performance and a decent plot, this film is a good thing in the box office today. Because of its overly slow pace and overall feeling after it's done, I wouldn't want to watch this multiple times, but it's worth seeing and puts a different spin into this genre. Rating: 7/10 |
Hustlers:
Storyline:
Destiny starts working as a stripper in order to take care of her grandma. She friends the top money maker in the business, Ramona and they start a scheme and recruit others to make even more money. While this is high energy, entertaining and captivating, it is worth watching considering the few stellar performances it offered, it's a female cast and is based off a true story. This is J. Lo's best role yet. I am not the biggest fan of her work, so casting her as the lead I was hesitant about it, but she genuinely did a stellar job and played her character almost flawlessly. Same thing goes for Constance Wu, the other lead role. Both their performances together was believable, relatable and well done. On the other hand, besides the two I mentioned before, the majority of the other characters were pointless. They were underdeveloped, predictable and acted poorly. They seemed to only be there as time fillers rather than actually providing beneficial aspects to the film. I think the direction and overall feel of the film got away from the director throughout the film. As time went on, there were different things focused on and other things that were left behind that played an important part to the story, which ended up creating subplots and/or plot holes. It didn't completely ruin the story, but it made me focus on figuring other things out first instead of enjoying everything else. Rating: 6.5/10 |
Risky Business:
Storyline:
Joel, a high schooler is home alone for the week and wants to have some fun while his parents are out of town, but things quickly get out of hand. The storyline is clever and at the time, very original, but watching it now, it gives me the feeling that it's repetitive and scripted. I liked Tom Cruise's performance and thought he did a great job being a personable, relatable teenager, but the supporting characters were distracting with their poor development and deliverance. The lighting and directing were interesting and put creative twist onto the plot. The viewer gets to see the struggle and point of view from the protagonist, while at the same time, we also get to see the fake persona he puts off and comes across as. There are a ton of iconic scenes in this that are too good not to be mentioned. There will always be a place for this film in history, along with its impressive soundtrack that is noticeable, yet not overpowering. Being a classic, it's hard not to like this to some extent. That being said, while I enjoy and would recommend this film, it's a bit overrated. Rating: 6.5/10 |
Blinded by the Light:
Storyline:
Javed, a Pakistani teenager living in 1987, England is dealing with both racial and economic struggles. While dealing with a rough life, he writes poetry to escape it. When a friend introduces Bruce Springsteen's music to him, his whole life changes. This story decided to show an interesting way of showing certain struggles and the theme across to its viewers, but it was original and creative. Personally, I’ve never been a huge fan of Springsteen, so that didn’t affect me either way of liking the film. The way the story progressed did it in an unusual, but understanding way. We got to see the loving family he had but how it wasn’t meant for him, as he was clearly different and separate, and he never felt comfortable asking for more. It was depicted in a relatable and personal way. The racial slurs and inequality that was shown was both uncomfortable to watch and perfectly made. While there were enough scenes to make it clear the issues he had to overcome, it never shined brighter than the purpose of the story, only added to the development of the protagonist. Many supporting characters had multiple issues. Depending on who it was, their performances were not as great as the protagonist, they were underdeveloped or their meaning seemed pointless in the storyline. Along with the overuse of certain aspects related to the storyline. The editing and directing created an in-the-moment, not so formal feel to the film, but at the same time, it did have a subtle feel of it being incomplete. However, especially from the powerful final scene, this film really makes you think about things we might take for granted and overlook in our everyday life. Rating: 7/10 |
Rocketman:
Storyline:
The truth behind the extraordinary life of Elton John and the struggles that made him who he is. The unknown hardships that's rooted within Elton John that focuses on his struggle with self acceptance, rough home life and substance abuse is perfectly expressed with an interesting script, fitting characters and brilliant cinematography. Taron Egerton not only resembles but sounds like Elton; he fit this role entirely. His expressions, emotions, struggles, etc. was consistent and incredibly raw throughout the entire film which created the authenticity and maintained the personal level this story offered. The entire set up of the plot was fantastic. It showcased on the meaning behind all the famous songs we know and how they came to life. The bond between the two main characters created the easygoing feeling of the film and showcased on the amount of talent he had. There were scenes with dance choreography, musical numbers, crazy parties and his childhood which combined showed us the aftermath of his actions, but also the unexplored truth of his past, with the misery and pain that took a hold of his life. Everything about this was extraordinary. The production of this film makes the viewer feel closer to Elton and his music, but also makes you take a step back from the world and truly appreciate/understand what he provided- a timeless medium for everyone to enjoy. Rating: 8.5/10 |
The Graduate:
Storyline:
Once Benjamin is finally home and completed with his education, he just doesn’t know what he wants to do with his life. Not only is he dealing with his personal struggles, he also has to deal with the ongoing questions from everyone around him. The acting is incredible. Every character is authentic, real, personable and has depth to them. The push-over and awkward personality of a college student mixed with the high strong, bossy persona of a successful woman truly makes this film what it is. On top of that, the soundtrack is amazing. Music can really make or break films- the songs provided by Simon and Garfunkel is the perfect choice. Not only did they make each scene flow into the next, but, they make you feel exactly what the characters are feeling. The directing and cinematography were great as well. There were many scenes that have little things you might not pick up on that make the more times you watch it better and better. Rating: 8.5/10 |
The Interpreter:
Storyline:
An interpreter for the United Nations overhears a conversation she shouldn’t have about an alleged terrorist attack. When she alerts authorities, she becomes both a suspect and a resource. This was incredibly slow in a bad way. The entire film had a plot that dragged and was lacking the progression it needed in order to catch my interest and grab my attention. The performances felt genuine to their character, but forced with their relationships- the bond between the main characters was both unrealistic and underdeveloped. There were subplots that made sense and weren’t oddly placed, but were underdeveloped, which led to them coming off that way. If more time was added to the backstories of the characters, maybe this could be different. If you have time to watch this, go for it. I don’t recommend for a happy, entertaining watch, as it lost my interest a couple minutes in. Rating: 4/10 |
Widows:
Storyline:
A police shootout leaves four men dead with their wives grieving alone. Without their husbands to support them, the four widows pull off the heist their husbands were planning. Although this was off to a slow and non-amusing start, it picked up and was the right route for this story. It built up the suspense of both the development and the events leading to climax. The characters were all different and unique that kept a consistent flow, even when the mood was heavy. Yes, there were some things that I didn’t necessarily enjoy or like, but the performances were authentic and genuine which made me not focus my attention on them. The directing took a different approach with camera angles and shots. With the slow pace of this story, it worked for me and still made it entertaining, this was a great form of cinematography. Once everything was pieced together at the end of the film, it was very anti-climatic. Not that it was bad or uneventful, just with all the good things this film had to offer, the ending/climax could have been better. Rating: 7/10 |
Casablanca:
Storyline:
Rick, the owner of a nightclub in Casablanca is reminded of his painful past when Ilsa, someone he knew in Paris, comes into town with her husband. One of the most known and iconic films in history lives up to the hype, but definitely isn't as great as its known to be. Being in black and white, things have to be shown more through the development of characters, the storyline and the lighting rather than over the top action and scenery in some things we see today, which is exactly what was done. The storyline wasn't as predictable as it might seem. Its a love story that has some variation to the happy, fairy tale endings that are in basically every Rom-Com, which I enjoyed. The plot was really thought out in that manner, but also the character development. The two main characters did a great job expressing the challenges and repercussions of their actions, which made them very personable and having the audience feel like they're in the moment with them. Although the story is revolving around the main characters, it also showcases on other relationships that were valuable to the flow and added to the unpredictability. I really liked this film, especially for the time it was made. Compared to modern films with more advanced technology, it is just as good. Never once did it loose my interest and had a consistent flow throughout. Rating: 8/10 |
Yesterday:
Storyline:
Following a freak accident, Jack wakes up in a world where The Beatles never existed. Being a struggling singer/songwriter himself, he becomes an overnight sensation when he performs their songs. While this is obviously such a creative and innovative topic in general, it also provides strong character development, a comedic script and amazing musical performances. This had an unlikely, yet spot on casting for the lead. His personable character provided the audience with the opportunity to understand his emotions, along with sharing his struggle of no one knowing who The Beatles are. My only negative to the casting is Ed Sheeren, he had no need to have such a big role in the film and should stick to singing. The storyline was great. This was one of the most unexpected and original pieces I have seen in awhile, just everything about it had its own twist onto life messages and comedic aspects. While there is so much to capture when it comes to The Beatles, this film chose to focus on the light the songs bring into the world rather than focusing on their story; the mix between this RomCom and Musical Drama balanced each other without outshining the other and achieved it's feel-good, light watching state. Rating: 8/10 |
I Am Mother:
Storyline:
When a girl is raised in captivity by a robot, her whole world changes when another human visitor arrives. I'm not going to sugar coat it when I say that I had much higher expectations from this film. Not only was it extremely slow and uneventful, but the storyline wasn't anything interesting either. With a Sci-Fi film like this, normally they are more on the slower side of things and rely on the plot to carry it along, while this was doing that, it didn't have a solid plot to go with it, so it just became boring, repetitive and anticlimactic. The acting was poorly done as well. The protagonist was incredibly stiff and anticipated. Nothing felt special, unique or true to the story. The only positive I have to offer is that the developmental side of things was spot on. The time frame throughout her life in captivity was well shown to the viewer in a clear manner. The idea of this is very clever and interesting, but just was not executed. This was not terrible, but was very disappointing; there are better things to watch than this. Rating: 5/10 |
Once Upon a Time in... Hollywood:
Storyline:
Set in 1969 Los Angeles, Rick Dalton is dealing with his conflicts of the changing industry, along with his long time stunt double, Cliff Booth. The level of disappointment I have in this film is unsettling. While it was not a terrible film, it was discomforting for me to see this from Tarantino. Unlike any of his films, the storyline was missing. Normally that's the heart of them, but instead this had the same slow build up (incredibly slower than usual, though) which led to a finale that was anti-climatic, and on top of that, it was left open ended in an incoherent way. The amount of pointless, useless and unnecessary characters this had to offer was insane. More than half of the characters had no relevance to the storyline, and were just random time fillers, especially Margot Robbie, she had absolutely no point to this alternate universe Manson murder plot that was created. The directing, as always, was spot on. While I didn't love the plot, the way he presents things to his viewers not only creates a captivating watch, but has the feeling that the characters and situations are real. By being this upset from this film, it's because Tarantino is good to begin with and is held with high expectations. It definitely needs to be seen, but only out of appreciation of the director. Rating: 6/10 |
On the Basis of Sex:
Storyline:
The inspiring true story of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, her family, fight for equality and the tax case her and her husband took on to make a change in history. While it's unarguable that this is an extremely important topic and innovative time in history, I wish this biopic could have highlighted more on her strengths and skills that helped her achieve the incredible things she's credited to, instead of glancing over them. Ruth was talked about as the heart of the true equal rights protestor, but the way she was portrayed created her to be someone who was easily pushed aside and became winey as time went on. Although these things might have been true and made her who she is, they didn't go hand in hand with her character, and only the final scene I didn't question it. The time frame and transitions were very choppy. None of the scenes moved seamlessly into the next, and frequently in the beginning & middle of the film I was questioning what time we were following within her life. All the scenes with their family/any scenes in their home felt incredibly forced. All the dialogue and interactions not only felt fake, but had the sense that it was rehearsed too many times. Overall, this is an intriguing story that makes you think about this time in history and the struggles that both women and men went through, which you might not have thought twice about before. Although it has some rough patches, it's still a good one time watch. Rating: 5/10 |
Fighting with My Family:
Storyline:
Knowing nothing but wrestling from their family, Paige and her brother Zak try out for an opportunity of a lifetime- a chance in the WWE. Things take a different route than expected when only Paige is chosen. I completely had no hope for this film, and it exceeded my expectations. It definitely wasn't perfect, but enjoyable. The plot was neither too fast or too slow, had great protagonist development, and was intriguing. For one, the pace was consistent, along with the tone, which set the basis of the family driven plot. The exception to this is that while the things within the story were expressed well, there were definitely down times and scenes that didn't fit accordingly throughout, which created an uneven feeling to this heartfelt story. Her brother was just not it for me. He was incredibly flat, predictable and selfish. While it was shown how depressed he got after the incident, his development consisted of one small conversation that wasn't climatic and his views instantly changed. With such a meaningful role to the main character, it was upsetting to have his character portrayed this way. Overall, this is truly a heartwarming story driven by a comedic script. Through the unexpected light feeling while watching, high anticipation and strong protagonist development, it's an entertaining and compelling story. Rating: 7/10 |
Amadeus:
Storyline:
The story of composer, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart and his unremarkable talents on the piano, who is resented by Antonio Salieri, another composer who is well below his talent level and is fueled with jealousy. I am grateful to have watched this film because it was unlike anything else I would normally watch, and it has an amazing plot. The story, characters, production, sound track, and many other aspects were awesome. The casting was spot on. Every character, main and supporting, fit their role perfectly. Never once had I felt their emotions were forced or scripted, and the audience felt right in the moment during the entire film. I loved the way sound was varied throughout the film. When either of the composers were constructing a piece, the audience heard the orchestra in the background as it was being developed. This added to the in the moment feeling throughout. The climax was eventful along with the ending. Nothing felt predictable or underdeveloped, which enforced the high adrenaline pace and flow of this story. Rating: 8/10 |
Pearl Harbor:
Storyline:
Based on the true event, which follows two childhood friends and how joining the Air Force/the war effects them, and of course, their brewing love triangle. While this may be categorized as a War Drama/Action & Adventure, it's far from it. Rather the majority of it is a romance film with the topic of war, a hint of a drama with a slow pace and a little bit of action. This is just over 3 hours long and there was absolutely no reason for it to be. Despite the fact it felt run on and long, it was filled with unnecessary scenes and a dragged out plot. The characters weren't necessarily played bad, they were just underdeveloped and flat. Their actions were highly anticipated and I just became bored. Like I had said before, the topic was war, but the genre was romance, so the slow pace and the predictable characters was just not a good combination. The little snippet of action we see was definitely entertaining, but over the top like all Michael Bay films, which I'd expect nothing else from him. The sound was on point though, going hand-in-hand with the editing, so it did create a consistent and unison flow within the story. I wish this memorable, historical event could have been played out better in Hollywood, but since everything gets re-done nowadays, I'm sure it'll come soon enough, since this was made about 20 years ago. That being said, there are definitely worse films than this to watch. Rating: 4/10 |
The Black Dahlia:
Storyline:
Inspired by a true story, this follows two cops in Los Angeles, 1946 and their quest to solve the murder of the actress known to the public as "Black Dahlia". The plot was decent. There was never a dull moment or predictability that couldn't be avoided. There were a couple holes, meaningless subplots, and an expected ending, but that didn't take away from the focus of the film, as it was always clear what was the center of attention. The cut scenes were incredibly random and choppy, though. There were many instances that had scenes end at awkward times or in weird ways that didn't follow a common flow throughout the film, so it resulted with a rough transition. There were a couple times that had different camera angles that didn't really seem to fit, which normally wouldn't be an issue, but since the flow was so choppy, it was pretty noticeable. The lighting in this movie was foreshadowing the corruption of certain characters or events happening, and I thought that was a nice, not so obvious touch to the story. Rating: 5.5/10 |
The Edge of Seventeen:
Storyline:
While Nadine is at the peak of her awkward, high school slumps, her brother starts dating her only friend, and her whole world falls apart. This is not an all star film, but it's a unique take on high school. Everyone is down on their luck at some point, and everyone knows that high school isn't easy, so I thought the way that the two were brought together created a great depiction of self acceptance and glory. By the accurate, raw interactions and representation of the awkward protagonist, all the scenes were felt by the audience and added to the authenticity of her character. While on the other hand, the acting of the supporting characters started to feel fake and boxy with their dialogue throughout the film. The plot was decent. It had a consistent tone, but was slightly predictable. Some of the characters were not developed as much as the rest, which made it choppy in that aspect. I enjoyed the ending and the production on a whole, though. While this was incredibly awkward, not a formal script, and had different approaches to familiar life lessons, it was creative and interesting to watch something that's not the same old typical film. Rating: 7/10 |
A Simple Plan:
Storyline:
Three guys find millions of dollars lost in their small town. Trying to keep their find quiet from the police and take the money, there seems to be people looking for the lost cash. The start of the film began slowly, by showing the lives of a normal, innocent family who were happy, until they found the money, then they started to question everything and paranoia set in. The way everything was presented to the viewer was not formal, rather something that was relatable and able to understand what the characters were going through in the moment, its an incredibly believable story/characters. The majority of this was slow, but offered plenty of development and suspenseful moments to accommodate them. The acting was never questionable. Each character was played perfectly, to the fact that times I forgot I was watching a movie because I understood and empathized with their feelings so much. This is honestly just a simple plan that follows the hardships of what obtaining large amounts of money can do to a good group of people, and how it can make them do things that would never cross their mind otherwise, with an ending that makes everything come together and finish with a high note. Rating: 7.5/10 |
Green Book:
Storyline:
Dr. Shirley is an African-American pianist going on tour in the South in 1962 and is in need of a driver/bodyguard. He hires Tony Lip, who has no idea what's to come. This is not only an inspiring true story, but it was an incredibly well made and produced film. This pretty much had genres to catch everyone's interests. While at times it was slow and was developing the relationship between the two characters, it served his purpose and never felt down. It had funny dialogue, sad/touching moments, a good soundtrack and important messages to get across to the viewer. The tone of the film was perfectly established and maintained. It had an easy going flow to the story that was entertaining, but also had many underlying meanings that were expressed without clearly stating them, and I think that's what made it so well made. It can either be a hit or miss when creating a story about sensitive topics like these because you don't want to get too political, but this had just the right amount of everything in it. The casting was spot on. The way Dr. Shirley was portrayed, made me feel the same emotions everyone else did in the film when they were with him. While at the same time, Tony's character was both comedic and thoughtful in his own way of creating his character. This was a familiar story as far as unusual relationships go, but took its own spin on things with all the amazing aspects it included. Rating: 8/10 |
The Silence of the Lambs:
Storyline:
Buffalo Bill is a serial killer who is known to skin his victims, in order to catch him, the F.B.I. sends in an agent to see if imprisoned Hannibal Lector, a psychiatrist who is also known to be a cannibalistic serial killer, can help. The acting was phenomenal. Both Anthony Hopkins and Jodie Foster performed their roles to a new level, it felt as though they really were their characters and we were following along within their story, rather then them playing a role assigned to them. The pure, heartfelt, and raw performances added to the effect of this film. The directing was great as well. Each shot was done strategically to give the viewer a certain feeling, whether it was for dramatic effect, suspense or adrenaline scenes, they were transitioned perfectly on time and helped create the high anticipation and energy within the story. The story itself was intriguing and unpredictable. As the viewer, there was never a time you knew for sure what would happen. Between the development of a drama, mixed with the high anticipation of a thriller there was never a moment that didn't provide information valuable to the plot. This is one of the best forms of cinematography I've ever seen, I enjoyed every aspect this film had to offer. Rating: 9/10 |
Black Hawk Down:
Storyline:
Based on a book, this is the story of elite soldiers that go into Somalia in order to capture the top two lieutenants of the Somalia warlord, which is supposed to be an easy mission, until they're ambushed. This was a well produced film that was genuinely entertaining. The directing was clean and fitting throughout the whole story, which made the flow of the film continue without dragging on. The storyline itself was pretty decent as well, there wasn't a lot of background information regarding the mission, but you got the basics and were never left confused. There were plenty of intense action sequences, but there were also many scenes that showcased on the other side of the battle. It was intriguing, but anticipating as you never knew what was going to happen next, so you were always kept on your toes and never knowing the next move. The characters were unique as well. Everyone had their own story as to why they were there, but everyone was connected. One thing I was disappointed in was that there wasn't any development between the characters within their relationships or lives, with this, this film could have been better, but it wasn't a deal breaker. This may not be my all time favorite war film, but the combination of the sharp directing, intense action sequences and an interesting storyline, this is a great form of cinematography. Rating: 7.5/10 |
A Simple Favor:
Storyline:
Stephanie, a widowed vlogger tries to find the truth behind her best friend Emily's disappearance, with the help of her husband. While digging into her past, she ends up finding a lot more than what she expected. The thought behind this was there, but it didn't execute to the potential it had. The storyline was not what I expected, but then again, exactly what I expected. In other words, I thought this wasn't going to be as predictable as it was. There were "twists" within the plot that I saw coming from the beginning of the film and "betrayals" that were anti-climatic. Along with filler scenes within the story that really had no relevance and didn't need to be there. Being centered around polar opposite leads, the bond between the main characters was genuine. Nothing ever felt forced, awkward or choppy as the main characters were acted well which kept the flow of the film. The exception to this is that I hated the husband, he just didn't play his role well and genuinely was annoying. I had higher hopes for this film as the previews made it seem like an intriguing thriller, instead it was just an average "crime" film that was a let down. Rating: 5/10 |
The Dirt:
Storyline:
The untold story of Motley Crue, showing the crazy lives they had and everything they were involved with. Something as crazy and high paced as this film was truly hard to believe everything this band went through. Not really knowing a whole lot about them, it puts their music in a different perspective after seeing their story. The acting was terrible. Honestly, I don't think they could have had worse dialogue or deliverance of lines in every scene of the film. This was a major set back to this high-adrenaline story. I wish more of their music was included. Motley Crue has tons of hits and talent that I wish was highlighted on more than what it was. The flow of the story was solid, though. It always kept the steady moving pace and fast flow throughout, even when the acting was poor and down in moments. I liked that they went into some background information about Nikki Sixx and we got to see a little bit of his rough childhood, but I wish more was shown within his and everyone else's lives in the band. I think these upcoming stories of 70's/80's bands need to focus on their childhood, time in the spotlight, and aftermath, because a biopic should show everything that makes them who they are. With such a well-known and loved band, I wished their story would have been shown better. Rating: 5.5/10 |
Bohemian Rhapsody:
Storyline:
This is the story of Queen/Freddie Mercury and how they came to be what they're known as today. Being a fan of Queen but only knowing some of their most famous songs, it creates a different outlook on their music. Mainly everything in this movie was true, (besides a couple circumstances and timing differences) so the image conveyed was very accurate to what they truly were. The storyline kept my interest the entire film. Even at times where it was slow, it was there for a developmental reason and was engaging. Along with the musical scenes, whether they were performing, writing, in the studio, etc., there was never a moment that didn't provide the viewer with something interesting. The acting was stellar. Everyone played their role as realistic as the real people, especially Rami Malek- his representation of Freddie Mercury was amazing. He was incredibly relatable and personable, but most importantly, you truly felt his struggles trying to find himself, and understood what he was going through, as no one ever did during his life. Also, he sang everything in this as well, which sounded incredibly similar to the original recordings, and added to the authenticity and raw performances of this film. Overall, the cinematography and production of this film deserves the hype it's been getting. This is a heartwarming story that showcases on the relationships and extraordinary people that made Queen so different and unique. Rating: 8/10 |
Welcome to Marwen:
Storyline:
Mark Hogancamp was a victim of a violent hate crime in which almost killed him. Following his attack, he is left with little to no memory of anything before it happened, and is barely able to write his name. He turns to photography to fulfill his art passion. This is an interesting story that could have had a lot of dimension and character to it if it was developed, written, and produced correctly. There were basically two storylines it followed, one showcasing on the severity of his attack, which shows through the make-believe stories he creates with his action figures/dolls, and another following through his real life and how he is struggling between fantasy and reality. All of the characters in his fantasy world were based on real people, but only a couple were slightly developed and some you were left knowing nothing about. This was a major issue for the flow of things because the viewer should not be left to assume these things on their own. In addition to those characters not being developed, neither was the protagonists life. Obviously, his mind is severely damaged and he has no idea of who he is, but the viewer doesn't either, and it becomes confusing trying to understand and relate within his struggles. This could have been a creative, heart warming story, but instead was a waste of time. Rating: 3/10 |
The Mule:
Storyline:
A true story about a 90-year-old Korean war veteran that gets himself tangled and eventually caught transporting drugs in Illinois for a Mexican cartel. Clint Eastwood has high expectations from all his fans with any movie he directs, writes, or acts, in which this is all of the above. This did not disappoint, and every Clint fan should make their way to the theater to see it, but I did have higher hopes. Throughout the story, the viewer gets mixed emotions on whether or not they should be rooting for or against the 90-year-old mule, which is exactly how I think the character should have been perceived. He was a somewhat decent guy, as he was shown helping strangers and being extremely generous, while at the same time, ruining his relationship with his family and trying to make up for lost time through a couple of weak gestures. I think the struggles of his character shown throughout the film helps you relate on some levels and understand his pain and thoughts. I was not a fan of his wife's character, though. Personally, I thought she was just annoying and unestablished, as she was on a different emotional level each time she was shown with no scenes that related to her growth. But keeping in mind the whole film was primarily focused on the protagonists development, it didn't ruin it. But then again, nothing was really accomplished throughout or by the end of the film either. The other side of the story that developed the police side of the drug transports was done creatively as well. It wasn't overpowering, but was shown enough to piece together the missing aspects in the storyline. This is something different in the box office today and an uncommon approach. Rating: 7/10 |
La La Land:
Storyline:
Sebastian and Mia share a common goal of pursuing what they love, but when both of their passions take off, their relationship is threatened by their dreams. I think this is highly overrated, but a decent film that’s worth watching. The storyline was good, a very realistic story that develops more of a real life interaction, rather than a scripted movie, which works for this type of film. Going hand in hand with that, the two main characters were played well, but were flat. You received needed information regarding them, but you didn’t really get a whole lot more, as their personalities were limited. The soundtrack was great, though. The choreography is well thought out and executed. The chemistry between Emma Stone and Ryan Gosling’s characters throughout the entire film was effortless, making their relationship feel incredibly real. I enjoyed the ending as well. I thought it was clever and unexpected, but also realistic and thought out, in which it showcased on the characters development and maturity from the beginning of the story. I definitely didn’t dislike this movie, as it is a nice change in movies recently, I just don’t think it deserved the hype it had received. Rating: 7/10 |
Catch Me If You Can:
Storyline:
A true story about Frank Abagnale, Jr.- a 17 year old kid who runs away from home and is a master of deception. Being a pilot, doctor and a lawyer, he is the most successful bank robber in history of the U. S. Every character serves their purpose with genuine, real performances that help develop the story and keep the flow going. But, no character is ever overpowering or rushed with their development. Another thing that was done well is the camera work. Each scene is progressed to the next seamlessly. The storyline was solid, having everything fit into place and proceed steadily. There were a couple scenes that were predictable and/or cliche, but there is no way of avoiding aspects like that, and it didn’t ruin the story. However, the beginning and ending scenes could have been developed more, along with some aspects that happened in real life, but with true stories there is only so much that can be exaggerated and focused on, while still being accurate. Overall, this is a well produced film that is enjoyable to watch. Rating: 8/10 |
Terminal:
Storyline:
Two assassins and a sick teacher get intertwined with a criminal mastermind and a waitress who lead a double life. The storyline seems complex, but really isn’t. There are two stories you follow and how everything comes together. But, not everything correlated in the end, leaving you with with gaps of information. Some things that are meant to be picked up on the second or third time you watch, could be seen the first, leading to the predictability of the film. The “twists” were predictable and uneventful as well. Some things within the film didn’t really make sense either. There were unanswered questions I feel the viewer shouldn’t have to infer by themselves and other characters/scenes that never got the information they needed. This movie is just about an hour and a half, but it felt like three hours. I checked my watch at least five times and it felt incredibly dragged on, just wanting it to end. Honestly, this was incredibly bad. I had higher hopes from Margot Robbie, but you can’t win them all. Rating: 3/10 |
The Sting:
Storyline:
After a con mans partner is murdered, he teams up with a mutual friend in order to get revenge on the crime leader responsible. The plot was great. There was never a time where it was predictable or unbelievable; most of the time you didn’t know what was going to happen next in their plan of revenge. If a film today tried to create a story like this, they would not be able to achieve the original, laid back vibe that comes across. Not just anything can succeed with a complex storyline such as this, and have it flow. By saying this was a complex story, I mean that by all of the aspects that are combined. This is a crime drama, which develops a story, but at the same time, it was a comedy, without loosing the seriousness of the drama. Another thing that was done well was the acting. Each character fit their role well, had dimension, and had many aspects to them that helped you learn more information about them, which contributed to the development of the story. Rating: 8/10 |
Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid:
Storyline:
This true story follows two bank robbing, outlaw best friends and how they end up in Bolivia; with Butch being a respectful, likable criminal, when the Sundance Kid is crazy and incredibly dangerous. I really enjoyed this movie because it has lots of aspects from different genres. It had classic western aspects, the development of a drama by getting information across without it being dragged on, and some comedic scenes. Everything fit into place perfectly and effortlessly flowed. Another thing I enjoyed was the relationship between the main characters. Because they were polar opposites and partners, they had to have a real, authentic relationship, and they had exactly that. The whole time it felt as though you were following the story between the best friends rather than a forced, scripted bond. I think everyone should see this film because it’s a great mix of everything. Movies today don’t showcase on the relationships between characters and the flow of the story, instead they focus on the CGI and profits. Though this film was made in 1969, it is definitely worth watching for anyone of any age, as it is a must see movie. Rating: 8/10 |
Bad Times at the El Royale:
Storyline:
The El Royale is an old, run down hotel that sits on the border between California and Nevada. It becomes the place for seven strangers who get caught up in unfortunate events on an unlucky night. The story was broke up into sections following each person; what their story was, how they got there and how they’re all connected. As the viewer, you get pieces of information at different times, and it all comes together in end. I liked this approach for this story because the drama/thriller aspect made it flow. It kind of had the feeling of a Tarantino movie. Another thing I thought was done well was the way each character fit their role. Every character had their own screen time to learn about their story, (just being critical, there were a couple scenes and characters I would have removed or revised, but it’s not a deal breaker). As I’ve said in a previous post, I am not really a fan of Chris Hemwsorth’s acting with his attempts of an American accent, but he proved me wrong in this movie. His character might not have had the biggest role, but his character served his purpose, and was acted well. Plus, his American accent was believable. Overall, this film was something that lived to the potential it had and was made well. Rating: 7.5/10 |
Mid90s:
Storyline:
13 year old Stevie escapes his rough home life by joining a group of skaters in Los Angeles in the 1990’s. The vibe of this movie was different. The route it took was more of a laid back movie, which for this story, it was a good route to go down, but I didn’t think it executed to the potential it had. The acting had the feel of a forced, non-scripted approach. It felt as though the entire time everything was trying to come across so effortless, it came across as scripted and fake. I also think the storyline could use some help. The story followed Stevie, but also his group of friends. The viewers learn little about the group when they’re a big part of his life and the development of the movie. Along with his home life and how they came to act the way they did, there were gaps of needed information. Overall, this movie wasn’t bad, but it wasn’t good. It definitely was something different then everything else today, which was a nice change, but could have been much better. Rating: 5/10 |
A Star Is Born:
Storyline:
When successful singer/songwriter Jackson Maine falls in love with a struggling artist, Ally, he helps her build a career, while at the same time, dealing with their personal problems in their relationship. Just about every thing in this movie was done right. The plot was perfectly played and directed. It felt as though you were following along within the story, rather than a full formal scripted movie. The acting was great as well. The connection between the main characters felt incredibly real, making you feel every emotion they felt. Their lines effortlessly flowed throughout the story. Another great thing about this film was the soundtrack. Obviously, this is a story between two musicians, so there is going to be music throughout, but the quality and timing in each song was very well placed. One thing I hate is when music is played at awkward times, which can honestly can make or break things for me, but this wasn’t the case. Each song had a meaning and were placed at perfect times, achieving the meaning behind the story. This was a great, much needed change in movies this year. Rating: 8.5/10 |
The Departed:
Storyline:
When a cop goes undercover to infiltrate one of the biggest mobs in Boston, the mob sends someone to infiltrate the police department at the same time. The Departed is simply one of the greatest movies ever made. Between the action, drama, amazing acting and the nowhere near predictable plot, there is never a dull moment. Every actor plays their role incredibly well, and every character has dimension, making the movie effortlessly flow. Everyone serves their purpose in each scene. Even though there are many A-list actors, there is never a time where it feels that someone’s taking over. The plot has one of the best storylines. Without spoiling anything, that’s all I can say. You never know what’s going to happen next or who is going to figure out the others identity first. The more times you watch it, the more little things you pick up. There are many Easter eggs and clues you find throughout the film that make each time you watch better and better. Rating: 9.5/10 |
Braveheart:
Storyline:
William Wallace (Mel Gibson) is a medieval era Scottish patriot on a mission for revenge against the English for his country’s independence. Between the great acting and directing of Mel Gibson, this epic war classic follows the heartbreak and tragedy of the Scottish people when they’re overruled by Britain and their fight for freedom. The war scenes are extremely realistic giving the viewer the struggles that the characters are feeling, while at the same time, the down time and planning that goes into each and every move. This film conveys the pain and hardship that was felt from all the tragedy in Wallace’s lifetime that led him to where he is and how it shaped him. Being just over 3 hours, you will not be checking your watch. Every minute shows the ups and downs of the day-to-day life of this Scottish-men and his people. This is film also left us with the famous quote “Every man dies, not every man really lives.” Rating: 9/10 |