The Mosquito Coast:

Storyline:
An inventor moves his family from America to the jungles of Central America to bring his inventions to life.

With this film's screen time coming in just under two hours, it feels more like three. Dragging out an uninteresting story, this film never grasps the attention needed for such a slow and uneventful plot.

Consisting of a jumbled mess of information, none of the story matter seems to have any purpose. There was no significance for any character, no relevance for their location and a mass amount of confusion. The entire film was incoherent, having distinctive sections throughout the story, they were pointless standing alone or with each other. 

This film was barely held together by the narrating, which was a shaky element from the beginning. This was the only sort of stability the plot partially had. The problem was not only that it came at random times, but rather that the finale was trying to be touching but wasn't because the narrating was ineffective from the start. 

However, the positive I have to offer is only one aspect, Harrison Ford. This is by no means his greatest performance, regardless I enjoyed seeing him take on a role that is out of his comfort zone, as he plays similar characters in a lot of his films. Though he lacked in development and representation, he invested himself in becoming the best he could with what he had, even with a few mistakes. 

Rating: 3/10

​Regarding Henry:

Storyline:
A ruthless lawyer is as rough in the courtroom as he is to his family. After getting shot and having to re-learn basic functions, a different personality arises.

Going in with extremely low expectations and coming out presently surprised is always unexpected. This partially made me like this film even more, in combination with seeing multiple Harrison Ford movies in a row, when one is decent, it stands out. 

Truthfully, this is one of Ford's best performances to date. Illustrating a versatile performance, he did so much with mannerisms and expressions, conveying a connection to the audience. Sure, he can effortlessly play Han Solo or the one too many bad filler films, but they're all the same character. He shines and showcases his acting with this incomparable adaptation.

That being said, the actual storyline felt altered into a cinematic mindset. While making money on a film and obtaining viewers it needs to be entertaining, sometimes a heartfelt story can do more than what a happy ending Hollywood film can. Going for a too wholesome story caused for any realistic moments to feel scripted.

This isn't a re-watchable film or even something that I would recommend, yet has that small draw to keep you intrigued in the story. The first 20 minutes might be longer than need be but picks up the pace for the remainder of the film.

Rating: 6/10

Random Hearts:

Storyline:
After a plane crash kills both their spouses, a police sergeant and a congresswoman work together to find the truth about their significant others.

Everything about this production was terrible, just absolutely terrible. The storyline was one of the most constructed feeling turn of events in film. Many questions throughout the film were prominent, as nothing felt true to anyone's emotions. 

The performances were incredibly forced by everyone involved. I'd like to say I'm not surprised, yet I still had a small amount of hope that at least something would be decent. I'm not quite sure if everyone was trying to be bad or just not trying at all, but it was uncomfortable; everyone expressed a vibe of uncertainty from each line delivered.

The ongoing romance was artificial from every standpoint, and that wasn't the goal of it. There never were any moments to make anyone believe it and made the "anticipating finale" that much more unrealistic.

In addition to skipping over information that was required, the amount of dumb subplots thrown in made for a messy story. This film tried to do as many things as possible with a faulty plot that needed more time and development to begin with.

Rating: 2/10

The Age of Adaline:

Storyline:
Adaline Bowman has stayed the age of 29 for nearly eight decades. When she spends the weekend with a new romance and his family, it threatens to expose her secret. 

This story might have succeeded in entertainment value but lacked practicality. The entire set up of the story was based on an underdeveloped concept, feeling like an amateur production. Never did the protagonist’s pain and/or struggles feel legitimate enough for me to sympathize.

I am sick and tired of love interests in films being the worst characters. Not only was his character definitely too good to be true, but he wasn't a workable person who had flaws or anything unique about him.

To go off that, all characters were written to be flat, so really no one had any hope from the beginning. Just brushing the surface for each character, even the protagonist's "development" was anything but a round character. 

Ending the film with the most predictable way possible didn’t help me to like it anymore. Although I was entertained for the entire movie, it was easily predictable and just was a good way to kill some time.

Rating: 4/10

​

Blade Runner 2049:

Storyline:
Officer K, a blade runner is trying to find the truth behind a case. He needs to find former blade runner, Rick Deckard who has been missing for 30 years to help.

This film is truly breathtaking as far as visuals, cinematography, and editing. Creating a seamless picture that depicts the tone of the film in a modern and peaceful way. While this still has original aspects of the first film, it doesn't rely on that to carry it along, rather uses it as a stepping stone. 

Ryan Gosling was a perfect cast for the role. He provided someone rough on the outside, but still has the conflicts to make him a round character. Harrison Ford coincided with reprising his former role, although he was feeling slightly forced. He did provide relevance, yet there was an unspoken sentiment of him being not needed/not wanting to be there. 

The overall pace of the film was a slow go but made up for it with powerful performances and development. With this, the last act got a little out of hand. Coming to a point where it no longer felt true to the stability this independent film had going for it. Instead, it felt like it was trying to out-do itself with incorporating a highly anticipated climax that was just too much.

While there are plenty of aspects within this film that bother me, there are more to appreciate. This is a solid installment to a series that already has an established name but can still hold its own.

Rating: 8/10

42:

Storyline:
Branch Rickey, manager of the Brooklyn Dodgers pushes aside the color barrier of baseball and signs Jackie Robinson. 

While this film is very inspirational, it is so stationary of a melodrama format that it starts to take away from its power. The construction of the story has more pressing issues instead of the meaning behind it that could have been effortless. 

Though this is inspired by a true person, the heart of the story undoubtedly is moving. Proving a point that can stand true still to this day, it focuses on life messages that are not just baseball or racism, but acceptance. 

Chadwick Boseman portrays a strong lead that sticks with the audience. Having personable moments that were downing or uplifting, he convinced the audience that he was Jackie Robinson. Harrison Ford compliments as a supporting character that is both actively needed in the story, but still lets Boseman shine; Ford provides one of his best late career performances.  

Lack of detail represented in character development, the plot and constructing real-life events was a noticeable struggle. Whether it was not giving enough screen time to certain characters history, the order of events or a scripted feeling from important scenes, the film had some bumps in the road. This is still worth the time to see, yet isn't anything pressing.

Rating: 6.5/10

Morning Glory:

Storyline:
A newly hired producer tries to up the ratings of a dying TV program with difficult and clashing hosts.

As far as Rom-Coms go, this is pretty mainstreamed and unoriginal. While it offers nothing more than a quick and easy watch, it might lack in originality, but still provides the entertaining, happy ending story that is to be expected.

Though the characters were cast well, they were written with no development. Becoming the stereotypical, flat characters, their struggles, turnarounds, energy, etc. were seen from a mile away.  The same thing goes for the predictable storyline, this film fails to separate itself from anything in its genre by a lack of execution.

Honestly, I don't know what to say about the love interest. I wish he was either not included or was dealt with more time, as he really was just a subplot that was poorly done. He's in competition for the worst characteristic of this film; providing no substance or relevance, he’s just a time filler with no importance. 

The other contender for the worst aspect of this film was the beginning sequence. Having this “set the story”, I understand why it was included, yet it completely did not have to be. Beside it being useless, it lacked in creativity and cohesion to the rest of the film; the story would have expressed the same information to the audience without it. 

Rating: 5/10

Extraordinary Measures:

Storyline:
A businessman leaves his high-paying corporate job to find the doctor who claims he has a theory for a cure for his children with a fatal disease. 

Though the subject matter may be based on a true story, that doesn't help this from being completely terrible. If this were based on my life, I’d be embarrassed.

Sometimes Harrison Ford doesn’t try in roles and it clearly shows. He, along with Brendan Fraser created a duo that built off of each other's poor character portrayals. Each stiff response turned into another to depict fake individuals. 

There were more constructed instances than any that felt slightly realistic. Consisting of unbelievable actions any chance there was led to an inadequate expression of the story. The screenwriting failed to provide anything besides scripted and unnatural moments. 

Normally even when a film is struggling, I can always get through it. However, it was very difficult to stay in tune with this run-on story. Falling short on so many aspects, this film was doomed from the start. Although the true story is somewhat inspiring, the only way to understand that is by doing your own research after the film, which arguably defeats the purpose of its importance.

Rating:​ 2/10

Blade Runner: 

Storyline:
Deckard is a police officer tasked with retiring four replicants sent to Earth. 

Though with all the controversy regarding which version is the best version, each one has positive aspects to add. The Final Cut, however, is probably the one that is the easiest to watch and the most popular nowadays. 

Despite the many continuity issues, this film definitely was ahead of its time as far as its stylist achievements. Visually, although today is outdated, it’s pleasing and innovative, as no one had done this before. It naturally provides a crisp and clear image for what the story is and has aged well over the years. While some parts can feel slightly blocky, it easily can be looked past. 

The storyline provides a well developed first half finishing with a highly anticipated climax. Taking the time to establish the protagonist and his conflicts, the slow build of the intense and satisfying individual was effortlessly done.

Harrison Ford provided the perfect portrayal of an intriguing character. While his character was written well, he made someone who didn't just feel like a fake person on a screen, he was personable, flawed and clearly represented it throughout the film. 

Although the ending might be a little too corny for me to believe or have liked, it fit. The film, overall, has a storyline that makes the audience think after it’s finished, strong character development and a solid basis for the story to provide a re-watchable and engaging film. 

Rating: 8.5/10

The Call of the Wild:

Storyline:
Buck, a big-hearted dog gets taken from his California home to Alaska, having to learn and adapt to his new surroundings. 

I do not know the book this is based on, so I know nothing of how true it is regarding it. That being said, as cheesy as this can get, it's a good family film with a life lesson. 

First things first, the controversial CGI of Buck. More times than not, I truly appreciated the realistic form of the dog - though there were some scenes that questioned its integrity. I understand how difficult it is to make every instance look real, especially action sequences, yet you would think these challenging scenes that were clearly struggling would just not be included in the final product, as everything else was pleasing. 

The scenery, however, was done professionally. Crisp and clear locations helped the personable feeling of the story, as it was one of the steady aspects, among other not-so-great ones, to keep the film grounded.

The script was the worst element. Having predictable characters and lines turned into foreseeable actions, there was a lack of creativity. Especially with the antagonist, being out of place, flat and not believable. Which resulted in the progression feeling mainstreamed and unvarying from an expected ending. Nonetheless, it still held my interest and was surprisingly entertaining. 

Rating: 6/10

Force 10 from Navarone:

Storyline: 
Two Nazi killing men get paired with an  elite American unit to help bring down the German spy who only they can identify. 

Starting off with an underdeveloped plot, it felt as though the audience was thrown into an ongoing, existing story. That being said, the further the film progressed, more information was given so it all came together at the end, it just started off rough. 

The longer you watch, the better it gets. picking up the loose ends throughout the film, it offers dry humor along its course. While it had a climax that was predictable, it was enjoyable. Including many more predictable instances throughout, it fit the story. 

I enjoyed the quirky and goofy natured script. Though nothing seemed to have relevance to anything in the story, it was very entertaining to watch and a consistent vibe throughout the film. Everyone brought something that didn’t correlate, which created an easy, quick and fun watch. 

While this was made in the 70's and doesn’t feature the technology we have today, the cheesy fighting choreography is very comical. Regardless if it’s meant to be funny or not, that adds to the ongoing list of entertainment from this film. 

This is genuinely not a great film, as if provides no aspects that should be praised or highlighted, but it offered something incredibly entertaining that holds your interest, and is worth the time.

Rating: 5/10

The Secret Life of Pets 2:

Storyline:
Max finds himself learning new life lessons and things about himself once his owner has a baby.

​Coming off a film I didn't enjoy, this did the exact same thing. It is pretty hard to make a cartoon that isn't good, yet it seemed effortless in this. Genuinely the only positive this has to offer is the visuals and how interesting that aspect was. 

The problem with this film is that it never achieved the unspoken innuendo animations have. They just provide an entertaining and engaging watch subconsciously. The first scene didn't grab my attention from its dull nature, which was followed by nothing better because the entire film was constructed by them. 

Hardly any jokes made me laugh. With the few that did, the rest of the story was filled with the same lines in different ways. Having no variation, it became repetitive, predictable and truly passionless, there was no creativity with any of it.

The younger crowd probably can find a way to enjoy this because of the visually pleasing characters. For everyone else, though, don't waste your time. Having too much moralizing at the end from a meaningless story, this franchise should stay a sequel - but Hollywood will produce whatever makes money.

Rating: 3/10
​

The Devil's Own:

Storyline:
New York policeman, Tom allows who he thinks is a quiet  man visiting from Ireland, Rory to stay with him and his family as a favor for a friend.

The slow build up from a quiet and peaceful life to high anticipation was effortlessly done. Never feeling dull with the gradual development and never feeling out of place with its intense aspects, the transitions were both smooth and relevant.

The story was pretty bland. Not really having anything in particular that separates it from anything in its genre or era, even though it was entertaining. 

The development of the Irishman's backstory could have had more screen time. Although it's slightly mentioned and creates a motive for his actions, there's no meat behind that story. The audience can understand the internal struggles he goes through but when there is no depth to go with it, Brad Pitt's performance can only carry something so far until details are needed.

The final scene was ordinary and cheesy, but it suited the characters personalities, especially since they were heavily focused on for the majority of the story. It ended on a peaceful note and created an easy, simple point. 

Rating: 6/10

Frantic:

Storyline:
While attending a medical conference in France, Dr. Richard Walker's wife, Sondra is taken from their hotel room while he is in the shower.

The fact that the actual action of his wife being taken was never developed became very confusing for me as the viewer. While I started to piece some things together throughout its take, nothing was ever stated or filled in once it was over with. Numerous gaps of information were missing within the plot. 

The entire film had an incredibly slow pace, which was making me antsy and struggling to hold my attention. Then rushing, the last act had a bunch of aspects thrown in all at once. Plus,  to top it all off, it wasn't even eventful. Having "big" events happen only resulted in more questions since nothing was developed in the first place, so it all seemed irrelevant. 

As thrown off as I was during the film, there were multiple scenes in which the shot composition, editing or script  were done creatively, it just didn't fit in the story. Showing the struggles and conflict the protagonist was going through was made clear, but it was hard to relate when the situation was so complicated.

Fighting to have the positive sections of the film stand out, the weak concept and development of the plot was too prominent. 

Rating: 6/10

Cowboys & Aliens:

Storyline:
Waking up with a metal shackle around his wrist and no memory of how he got it, a gunslinger finds that he is the only person who can stop the frequent, mysterious attacks of the nearby town. 

The concept of this film is pretty stupid, but ironically, it never made the audience feel that way while watching it. Yes, it never felt real or believable, but it was fun and entertaining while it lasted.

That being said, no one from any aspect really put much effort into this. The CGI was very messy and thrown together, with not even the slightest questioning from the producers wondering if they did well. The performances were just there, neither outstanding or awful, but had actors I definitely would expect more from. Plus, the plot had multiple holes which sadly became apart of the fun and entertaining story because it really wasn't worth the effort to try and figure them all out. 

With everything out there, I really do like everyone who was apart of this film. Whether or not they were good in this film, I do think that it was a combination of good people and well known names thrown into a money grab rather than a good production. But, if we're being realistic here, what did anyone REALLY expect from a film of this title. 

Rating: 5/10

Working Girl:

Storyline:
Tess McGill is a receptionist with brilliant ideas who brings them to her boss, Katherine Parker. When Katherine takes them as her own, Tess seeks revenge by pretending to be her while she's out. 

The background information/setting the story was actually done properly, even with the nature of these films being bad in that regard. We saw the struggle of the protagonists life in the beginning, her journey and what came to be full circle with solid character development. 

The storyline on the other hand, was pretty simpleminded​,  but in the grand scheme of things, was tastefully done. Though I expected everything that happened to happen, it was presented in an unconventional way that made it captivating. 

My issue with the supporting characters was that they were incredibly flat and limited with their personalities. But what amazes me is that even though these negatives were clear, they still managed to provide relevance to the storyline. I don't know how to describe how this happened, but kudos to the productional team. 

Overall, this wasn't a good film, but was at the same time. While numerous negative aspects to the plot and characters were present, it didn't stop this film from entertaining. I wouldn't necessarily want to sit down and watch this all the time, but is enjoyable when you do. 

Rating: 6/10

Clear and Present Danger:

​Storyline:
When Jack Ryan becomes acting deputy director of the CIA he starts to piece together information regarding cover-ups over drug deals. 

Same thing as the first installment to this franchise, these are entertaining films, but have nothing special to leave me loving or completely compelled from the storyline. 

That being said, I do think this was better than than the first. By already having the background information established, there is more room for the the plot go into other areas with action, anticipation and developing the antagonist. While these aspects fell below par, their efforts didn't go unnoticed. 

While the antagonist was very predictable and basic, he played his part within the storyline by being a structure for it to rely on. There were some minor subplots (that weren't distracting) but were kept grounded from his plan and Ryan's mission to find him.

​Though this is something that is the typical action movie of this era, it still manages to hold your attention and suspense. While at times things can seem cheesy or dry, it wasn't made to be, plus, it's not like the cover of the film looks like it'd be anything extraordinary. 

Rating: 6.5/10

Patriot Games:

Storyline:
Former CIA agent, Jack Ryan stops a terrorist attack in London, putting a target on his back and putting his family lives in danger. 

Genuinely an entertaining and enjoyable watch, but the productional aspects were nothing special which provided a very dull and average film.

The action sequences absorbed your attention, but lacked variation as far as separating itself within the genre. By having choreography that felt rehearsed and rigid, it lacked a sense of comfort and originality. 

The casting was adequate. The performances matched the dialogue by both not having the wow factor, but still getting the job done. The development and progression of the protagonist was accomplished throughout the film with no hesitation and did keep an upbeat, steady flow to the plot.

As far as some of the situations/action sequences that went down, even I was questioning at some points if that could have really happened. The practicality of the film was slacking big time and it clearly showed.

While this started to become repetitive and familiar at times, this is truly an intriguing watch from start to finish and is easy to watch and enjoy.

Rating: 6/10

Witness:

Storyline:
After witnessing a murder, a young Amish boy and his mother are kept under the protection of a police officer while they are in serious danger. 

My issue with this film was that each individual scene was composed nicely and took interesting turns, but they all were thrown together without a clear tone and came across messy. The entire film did not flow whatsoever, which was disappointing because it was filled with aspects that could have been great. 

The performances were enough to say they were there, but I've seen better. Adequately casted, no one stood out too much, but each had their moments that made you question whether you liked them or not. 

I liked the concept for the storyline and how it focused on two people with different religions, but not having that stop them from building trust between one another. That being said, it wouldn't have hurt them in the least to focus on some development throughout the plot. While certain characters were focused, other aspects of the plot were left out when they could have been crucial to the viewer.

The pace was incredibly slow. Barely holding my interest in the beginning, it never caught a steady flow to hold my anticipation. Once it was over with, I will say it was entertaining after knowing the whole situation, but the ending was dumb and pointless to the story on a whole. 

Rating: 6/10

Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull:

Storyline:
After finding out his job is in jeopardy, Indiana Jones sets out to Peru to find the crystal skull that the Soviets are looking for as well.

Sadly, this film was as useless to the film world as it is within this franchise. It did not need to be made, ruins the turn around The Last Crusade made from Temple of Doom and especially killed the original vibe this once had.

The problem with this film is that it doesn’t achieve the Indiana Jones feeling until the 2nd act (as even then it's questionable). It tries to add development in places it shouldn't and feature characters that are being forced onto the audience. 

Though I will admit, there are a select few scenes that are composed of the standards I expect, but only a few. Rather this falls into a category of mainstream action that loses its once appealing originality. This takes characteristics from lousy and basic action films and throws away its heart and grit.

As sad as it is to say, the script drifted from its creativity as well. Focusing on a more seasoned Indy, his formally witty, comedic lines are nothing short of predictable and worn out dialogue. 

Although I wouldn't go as far as saying this puts a bad rap onto the series, it 100% should not have been made. This is a disappointing establishment to the franchise and caps it off with something unacceptable.

Rating: 6/10

Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade:

Storyline:
Indiana Jones father is captured trying to find the Holy Grail and he sets out to rescue him using the same clues. 

Being the third installment in the franchise, that doesn't stop this series from doing what it does best, entertain. The anticipation, action and heart of the story are all just as good as the rest. 

The opening scene was a great way to start the film off. Giving the audience some background information on his childhood and how he grew up, it was perfectly transitioned into the next scene. Along with the rest of the film, everything flowed seamlessly into the next.

While Harrison Ford always does a great job as this character, his performance was heightened alongside Sean Connery who added a stellar supporting character. The other supporting roles were pretty much time fillers and were only slotted in to make relevance to the location they were in, rather than importance. Despite them, this still was casted well.

The action, again, did not disappoint. Having high adrenaline within each scene, the final battle went out with a bang and kept the audience on their toes. The final moments might have gotten a bit cheesy, but added to the father-son conflict development that had been happening.

Still offering more than just an action film, this manages to please everyone watching and produces a great picture. 

Rating: 8/10

Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom:

Storyline:
A prequel to the first installment, Indiana Jones is with a bar singer and his trusted sidekick in India, where they look for a missing stone.

This second film in the franchise is not as good as the first, but doesn't disappoint.

The opening scene kicks off on a high note that brings back the same character everyone loves with his comedic personality, also adding creative and entertaining action that doesn't disappoint, which established the tone of the film yet again.

His love interest had some issues, though. She was incredibly flat and had no depth to her character at all. She was predictable and not acted as well as she could have been. I'm disappointed. as this was something that brought this film down. On the other side of things, another supporting character, Shorty, was creative with high energy, which partially made up for her character.

The storyline was pleasing too. Though it did have more predictability to it, it didn't disappoint. It was fast paced, thrilling, and developed properly, which also added to the satisfying climax.

Despite this being a second installment, it brings back an incredible character and creates another adventure that is stimulating for audiences.

Rating: 7/10

Raiders of the Lost Ark:

Storyline:
Set in 1936, Archeologist and professor, Indiana Jones is hired to find the Ark of Covenant before Hitler and his Nazi's can get it.

This first installment of a well known franchise has created a character that is now a household name even after 30+ years, which still has creative camera work, a clever storyline, is visually pleasing and has plenty of action.

The plot is entertaining, and gets the viewer caught up in the story. The development of Indiana Jones with his unique personality is perfectly shown and acted through his partially comedic, yet serious dialogue and fast paced action sequences. 

Though this film didn't have the technology we have today as far as special effects, the stunts were still entertaining. They looked and felt real to the audience and never were disappointing. Though there wasn't too much action, it had just enough to entertain everyone watching, while not becoming boring.

The film on a whole didn't feel choppy as some action movies can become because the focus was on more than just that. With the clear focus of the story (development of the characters, story, history, etc.), it provided the audience with a satisfying film that included aspects of many genres. 

Rating: 8/10

Presumed Innocent:

Storyline:
Attorney Rusty Sabitch is accused and held accountable for his colleagues rape and murder. He hires defense attorney, Sandy Stein and his trial reveals many truths. 

I wasn't too impressed with Harrison Ford's performance in this. While he had the disturbed self-confidence you'd expect throughout the film, he didn't show any emotion when he put that message across. He had many long stares into the distance and plenty of short lines, it's safe to say he could have done much better.

I will say the end provided the satisfaction I was questioning we would ever receive. The majority of the scenes in court started to lose my attention as the pace was incredibly slow and dragged on.  So with that, having the finale go out with a bang, it made me like it just a little bit more. 

The storyline itself is thought-provoking and could be created into something measurable, yet it was just not executed. It started off on the wrong foot by not hooking the audience and just slowly went down hill. Paired with simple directing and camera angles, having nothing special or unique is its defeat.

Even with the numerous negatives this offers, it's not the worst thing out there and (for the most part) is entertaining. 

Rating: 6/10

Sabrina:

Storyline:
A very wealthy family, the Larabee's have two handsome sons. Their chauffeur's daughter, Sabrina, has a crush on David, the youngest son. After a trip to Paris, she comes back to Linus, the other brother falling for her, creating a complicated love triangle. 

The storyline itself was actually pretty cheesy once you think about it, but could have had positive things to offer, creating hope for something well done. With this though, it was poorly executed, creating an unsteady and jumbled film.

The performances were well below par. While we as the audience were thrown into what felt as an ongoing plot, the characters never got the development or clarity that they deserved. Their feelings were thrown left and right with no rhyme or reason, leaving flat, one depth character portrays.

The humor aspect was nothing better than anything else already going on. Everything that was supposed to get a reaction from me, didn't, and everything that was supposed to be serious, made me laugh from how tacky it was. My overall response from this was definitely not their intention, but did keep it entertaining. 

Like everything in this genre, the typical feel-good and hopeless romantic feelings will come and it will deliver. While there were numerous and frequent bumps along the road, it is just a Rom-Com made to entertain.

Rating: 5/10

​

The Fugitive:

Storyline:
Wrongfully convicted of the murder of his wife, Dr. Richard Kimble escapes from custody with the intentions of clearing his name. 

The casting was spot on. Harrison Ford and Tommy Lee Jones both provided stellar performances which made the audience captivated with every movement they made and each time they were on screen. 

The storyline was pretty dynamic. It offered the non-stop suspenseful feeling without losing any of the grit that goes along with the script. It kept you on the edge of your seat, but not in the same manner that other films in the genre can. 

The only negative I have to offer is that there was no time indication throughout his investigation. We see him at certain points where he looks different, the time of day switched or the weather has changed with no answers or explanation. This only became confusing with after thought though, not during the film. 

Lastly, while just about everything was developed well, the actual subject of the film (the murder) was not set up as well as I would have liked, it was only briefly shown. I wish once everything was finally pieced together, the entirety of that section would have been revealed. 

Rating: 7.5/10

Air Force One:

Storyline:
After giving a speech about never negotiating with terrorists, the President's plane is hijacked, leaving him as the only hope to get everyone to safety. 

Being a somewhat familiar storyline, that didn't stop this from entertaining. It had its predictable moments, but for the most part kept its steady progression.

Having a race against the clock plot, the pace was always fast. The high adrenaline tone added to the personal effect that rubbed onto its viewers. Feeling the fear of the victims but also the worry of the President. 

One of the "biggest" characters that helped create the hijack wasn't developed. While it was barely touched upon for the viewers seeing his true identity, there was no motive or details included. It had me question it throughout the entire film and drew me away from the other characters. 

Some of the cheesy one liners were more humorous than serious. While this wasn't the intention of the dialogue, it's just the nature of these 90's films, they're so dry and stationary in their ways that you just have to take everything with a grain of salt.
​
Despite some bumps in the road, this is captivating and engaging. 

Rating: 6.5/10 

What Lies Beneath:

Storyline:
Following Claire and Norman 's only daughter going to college, Claire begins hearing voices in their home. Thinking she is delusional, they both realize she is far from it. 

This is truly an innovative and fresh storyline that we don't always get to see in films, and while it gets a little out there, it captures your attention. 

Michelle Pfeiffer's performance was raw and personable. She was vulnerable at times, which had me sympathizing, delusional at others and even influential. Going on a rollercoaster of emotions, her stellar performance was captivating. 

The plot twist honestly got me. While in the grand scheme of things I can see how it could be foreseen, the way it was presented and the little bits of information coming at different times created a powerful and eventful bend of emotions, which was a brilliant touch. 

The sound was incredibly well done. Having a mix between silence and suspenseful music, it created an anxious tension throughout the plot which kept me on my toes, also adding a few jump scares.

Though some special effects were outdated, it was made 20 years ago, plus, a couple of plot holes were present, but nothing is perfect, so it's not that big of a deal. 

Rating: 7.5/10​

Hollywood Homicide:

Storyline:
Two LAPD homicide detectives get assigned to a case where a group of rappers are murdered, and they have to find the killers.

This is a typical buddy cop, early 2000's comedy- not really good, but somewhat entertaining. 

Besides some exceptions, I don't think Harrison Ford really tries to act in movies. He seems to only make them for money, not something that's worth being proud of, which is exactly this. His acting, along with mostly everyone else's wasn't very believable, as I never truly felt his struggles of his job that he would talk about. The exception to this is the other main character, Josh Hartnett, really expressed his feelings as to not wanting to be a cop and becoming distracted within his life, which added to the personable level of his character. Keeping in mind the purpose of this film was to be entertaining, and stories like these tend to not have much development, I understood the underdevelopment to that aspect.

The plot was also just the basic, stereotypical cop story- something bad happens, the good guys have to figure it out, an action packed chase scene happens, and everything works out in the end, and that was the whole story. There is nothing with that outline, just some room for improvement and more development.

Overall, this could have been a lot better and had more things added to the storyline, but the potential was never really there to begin with.

Rating: 4/10
​