Top Gun: Maverick
Storyline:
After more than thirty years of service as one of the Navy's top aviators, Pete Mitchell is where he belongs, pushing the envelope as a courageous test pilot and dodging the advancement in rank. Top gun: Maverick had some big shoes to fill. And, quite frankly, it does so in both an appreciative and independent way to create the best product possible - a sequel that is better than its predecessor. This is not only a critically immaculate form of cinema but it is additionally complemented by a BAM! rating that makes it hard to find a true flaw. With a supporting cast that embellishes - in the best and most fitting way possible - the truthful concepts that were so cheesily brushed past on the first one, they, in turn, are gracefully implemented. Solidifying a solid mold between the past and present nods to the relationship with the original with the finest technique by honoring it, but not trying to outdo it. Building this on-screen nostalgia that creates a space where they co-live, this arguably can be treated as a sequel or a standalone story of how hearty this is constructed. Of course, this is filled with incredible action and stunts that give you goosebumps, as everything was real-life, with no CGI, it's important to note that this is also one of the most cohesive action dramas out there. Although undeniably a surreal experience to see on the big screen, with its nostalgic cheesy moments and all, the wholesome theme, esteemed first-class flying experience, and most importantly, a brilliant plot that is close to being flawless, this film doesn't miss. Yet, overall, this wasn’t made just to have fun - even with it being an exhilarating ride - it rather was for a classic, iconic story and character that deserved a true finale. The first film was entertaining, yet failed to check any of the boxes critically. And while the sequel culture of Hollywood tends to ruin franchises, Tom Cruise will always deliver with the utmost and absolute dedication and exemplary right-minded products. 9/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 9/10
|
Ghostbusters: Afterlife
Storyline:
When a single mom and her two kids arrive in a small town, they begin to discover their connection to the original Ghostbusters. While Ghostbusters: Afterlife holds your attention throughout its entirety, it can't hide the fact that this simply had no purpose to be made. Although I don't hate this and was even engaged within, my problem with this film comes down to exploiting the nostalgia that comes with the essence of a classic for profit. Given this has creative special effects that distinguish itself from its predecessors, there are moments to take in. Visually playing to its strong suits by not changing what is most recognizable, this adds the modern tone that was needed to make it feel more believable. However, even with the stellar and completely unsurprising dedicated performance of Mckenna Grace, the surplus of unimportant characters counteract her significance. With an excess amount of characters and a lack of a connection to the audience, the premise of this story might have logically made sense, yet the implication feels pointless. Ending on a finale that fails to fulfill the original Ghostbusters, the only universal positive is the heartwarming tribute to Harold Ramis, and even then, still feels misplaced given the rest of the film. 5/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 6/10
|
Ghostbusters:
Storyline:
Three parapsychologists forced out of their university funding set up shop as a unique ghost removal service in New York City. Although developed now into the cultural phenomenon and legacy of Ghostbusters, this truthfully is the perfect family, feel-good, and comedic film for everyone. While now the special effects feel as outdated as they look, they are not unwatchable, which should be noted since many older films normally are. Let alone for the time it was made, this is a must-see for everyone. With this in mind, the stunts and CGI are still eventful. Finding a way to throw in a jump scare or an after-the-fact laugh, this is not as cheesy and predictable as it looks. From a witty script to a brilliant way of telling the story, this is still as funny as ever with an upbeat progression. Ghostbusters creates a fun and carefree film that worries about nothing but pleasing the audience, which is why such a cliche idea clicks. Paired with a goofy cast that provides a familiar feeling, this earns its name as a classic in more than one aspect. Setting the scene for the plot to roll with the intriguing concept, this is wholly enjoyable throughout it all and most of all has its quotable moments, notable wardrobe, and its esteemed theme song. 8/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 8/10
|
Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life
Storyline:
Lara Croft goes on a quest to save the mythical Pandora's Box, before an evil scientist finds it, and recruits a former Marine turned mercenary to assist her. While this is just as bad as its successor, the effort of making this more entertaining was clear, even if it wasn't successful. By already having the basis of the character established, Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life tries to make a fun and carefree turn of events, but is too absentminded to create anything worthwhile. Involving yet another short-lived and formulaic love interest, the notion of having a strong and independent female lead is nothing but hindered. Diminishing all (which even then was still not a lot) development of what makes Croft, the message gets quite taken away when it's complemented by a complicated theme. Sticking within its boundaries, although every aspect needed help to be more realistic and/or pushed in a different direction, this film was at least consistent. Jumping the gun on all growth between characters and their intentions, though, makes this film hard to stay focused on. With too many things going on at once, all with no details to back them up, this sequel is just as poorly done as the first. 3/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 3/10
|
Lara Croft: Tomb Raider
Storyline:
Video game adventurer Lara Croft comes to life as she races against time and villains to recover powerful ancient artifacts. It's quite surprising this got made, considering how quickly conflicts are introduced and similarly resolved. Lara Croft: Tomb Raider tries to cast attractive leads with a fun wardrobe to look the part, to cover up making a script and corresponding actions with no meaning. Being a fan of the game, I appreciate aspects that are an indication of its roots. Yet, just because it is originated from this idea does not mean it needs to follow it wholly, which is an inconsistent mindset this followed. Taking all the wrong moments to add animated-like characteristics to (only half of the stunts, setting, and dialogue), this feels so poorly made due to the fact there is no coherent circulation of what tone and/or vibe this is based on. While it's easy to tear this to shreds, it has a realistic English accent from Angelina Jolie and modern for the time action, this is not dreadful. That said, including a name that is destined for more potential, leads that are more talented than what was created, and an overall typically ordinary 2000s action, this does not have the much-needed qualities to make it unusual or interesting. 3/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 5/10
|
Mamma Mia!
Storyline:
The story of a bride-to-be trying to find her real father is told using hit songs by the popular 1970s group ABBA. Embodying the fact that a film does not always have to be good to be good, Mamma Mia! in truth, is not constructed well. Yet, among all its imperfections, no matter how frequent, this will always find a way to please. While the soundtrack, clearly is the most praised piece within, it goes without saying the utter talent included to make it happen. From an undemanding pace to pave the way, each song fits perfectly inside the dialogue. Not to mention the power of the voices, this would not be nearly as wholesome if each unique vocal performance was as fitting as it was. However, this does not include Pierce Brosnan; though remarkably enjoyable watching him sing with maximum effort, to which he has even admitted is not his forte, his wavery presence is just as prominently enjoyable. Satisfying the fans of ABBA and still capturing the attention of the nonfans, this plot hole-filled film charms with its visuals and songs but not with its structure. Taking place as a carefree watch, though the plot has troubles beyond what's seen on the surface, this can quickly become a comfort film, looking just toward its BAM! score. 4/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 7.5/10
|
Charlie's Angels: 2000
Storyline:
Three women, detectives with a mysterious boss, retrieve stolen voice-ID software, using martial arts, tech skills, and sex appeal. Though any product of Charlie's Angels is a household name at this point, this version is nothing short of a cheaply produced and written film that's only a money grab. With my views aside on the overdoing of girl power in Hollywood and how it always is done forcefully, this is in a completely different ballpark - objectifying the leading stars. Taking this to a point where the characters have absolutely no substance besides their taken advantage of materialistic "sex appeal", this desperately shows its true colors by creating nothing with thought. Not to mention the tacky dialogue, this progression takes a rough course. Stuffed with ill-fitting interactions and a surplus of plot holes, this isn't heading in any direction. Throwing in useless characters and random plot points left and right, the backbone of this story is chaotic and unplanned. While this film did not age well, from poor special effects to an almost uncomfortable watch, this may hold your interest, but for the wrong reasons. Admittedly, becoming entertaining enough in the moment, this is not recommendable, nor is it sufficient in being a good time passer. 3/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 4/10
|
Transformers:
Storyline:
An ancient struggle between two Cybertronian races, the Autobots and Decepticons, comes to Earth, with a clue to the ultimate power held by a teenager. Despite this film being the epitome of Michael Bay, from tacky product placement to excessive action, considering what it's worth, it's not too bad. Attentively holding your attention and providing just enough suspense to not fully question the questionable subject matter, Transformers actively executes an entertaining storyline. While the action and situations are without a doubt outrageous, they're not nauseating; though getting out of hand only in moments, the majority of this is incredibly realistic. Depicting a clear focus and sensible CGI, this feels as real as it can be. Yet, even arguably adding to the cinematic feeling this has, its overdoing of slow-motion is more noticeable than anything. Not to mention the transparent, stiff performances and coinciding stupid dialogue makes this overacted. Developing stagy and artificial front runners inside a cinematically and visually pleasing film creates a mannered vibe. With equally weighing and conflicting attributes, this film has its prominences and drawbacks -- but above all problems and praises, it's sure to entertain. 6/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 7.5/10
|
Miss Congeniality:
Storyline:
An F.B.I. Agent must go undercover in the Miss United States beauty pageant to prevent a group from bombing the event. Despite Miss Congeniality having a paper-thin plot and becoming comical based solely on being easy to make fun of the overly cheesy dialogue, it finds a way to bring its viewers in among all its downfalls. Without the essence of Sandra bullock, this film would be nothing. Embodying the character, she develops what not only keeps you on your toes but provides a personable individual. Originating a genuine laugh, she singlehandedly carries this simple-minded story to the title of a good bad film. Though the story is as foreseeable you can get, it stays in its lines to showcase what running with an entertaining idea done right can do. Adding in the blend of targeting the hopeless romantic anticipation and engaging action, this offers many characteristics in light of it being underdeveloped and rushed. Easily becoming a rewatchable and pleasing every time type of product, this is enjoyable, fun in the moment, and effortless to laugh with. 4/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 7/10
|
Snake Eyes:
Storyline:
A G.I. Joe spin-off centered around the character of Snake Eyes. This familiar and well-known character was shot from the get-go due to a film that sets out to be more cinematic than what it was written for. Counterfeiting a forced origin that's too unnatural to feel worthwhile, Snake Eyes has no purpose -- as it misses just about everything it could have done. With an overly staged and rushed beginning, the underdeveloped screenplay was trying to catch up in every moment. Leading to discontinuous storytelling, nothing was connected or cohesively blended, which separates you from the story. Without diving too deep into the terrible supporting characters and tiring subplots, every addition to the plot proves itself to be pointless. Simply losing your interest and becoming quite boring, the predictability doesn't help to make you want to see more. Yet, this becomes entertaining in the last act and provides enough action and intensity to be amusing; however, the rest of the film is slightly hard to get through. Even with the effort of Henry Golding's performance (as he did what he could with an ungodly wooden script), he cannot hold together an uneven concept that was not executed with the right intentions. 4/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 4/10
|
G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra
Storyline:
An elite military unit, G.I. Joe, operating out of The Pit, takes on an evil organization led by a notorious arms dealer. Expecting nothing less than the conventional plot this delivers, G. I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra stays true to its roots by providing a cheesy but diverting turn of events. Given its frequent and prominent issues, this by no means is a must-see, yet is amusing for the time being. While this is unstoppable to prove itself in the genre to be more than the comic stereotype it embodies, it had no hope from the beginning. Developing a foreseeable and simple-minded tone within its first moments on screen, this lacks sophistication; putting itself out there as the typical, quickly made action flick, it becomes nothing more. Striving from an established, nostalgic name, this features no originality to keep it going. With the anticipated weak performances and tiring conflicts, while the action is entertaining (but poorly done), the seasoned character arcs drain the life out of the film. Having enough cool gadgets and intriguing action sequences to be distracting in the moment, you can easily leave not thinking twice about it. 4/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 5/10
|
Star Trek Beyond:
Storyline:
The crew of the USS Enterprise explores the furthest reaches of uncharted space, where they encounter a new ruthless enemy. Given this can't be compared to the first in this franchise, it's a close second. Never failing to amaze with its dedicated plot and parallels, the persistent characters and new additions both feature an all-around, true to self, exciting story. Once again creating and consistently keeping the sophisticated tone, implementing the cheesy and witty humor comes effortlessly. Staying within its limits and not trying to do more than what it's worth, the complimentary, and quite in-depth action finds a way to seamlessly blend; delivering on this drawing action keeps you on your toes and puts you within the story. Not to mention, with its nostalgic content that proves itself to be relevant and practical, this provides a controlled direction that is eventful. While the finale is a bit more cheesy than I’d like to admit, it still is overwhelmingly amusing. Staying true to its roots without missing a beat cinematically, this finds a way to yet again, please all viewers and make a pretty solid film in the meantime. 7/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 7/10
|
Star Trek Into Darkness:
Storyline:
Captain Kirk leads a manhunt to a war-zone world to capture a one-man weapon of mass destruction. While this sequel is nothing close to being as great as the first, it becomes more a stepping stone within the series rather than anything significant on its own. Acting upon character arcs that are exciting and fulfilling regardless of a semi average plot, this stays true to its tone and progression that once separated itself within the genre. However, the unsuitable antagonist doesn't have a fit within the film. Feeling more like someone who was written to embody the conflict rather than deserving it, he becomes off-putting. Stealing away from the originality that this once created makes it more like a blocky, make believe concept instead of a personable story. Even with a slight cliche concept of a theme, this still gives the thrill from wholesome characters and absorbing action. Never questioning its integrity to providing a solid production that's reasonable, despite its few hiccups, Star Trek Into Darkness adds to a franchise that's imaginable and involving. 7/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 7/10
|
Star Trek:
Storyline:
James T. Kirk tries to live up to his father's legacy as a vengeful Romulan from the future creates black holes to destroy the Federation one planet at a time. Effortlessly developing this concept on screen to make a cinematic, suspenseful product, Star Trek is an engrossing watch for fans and nonfans alike. Appointing an utterly spot-on cast, the superb performances are as genuine as they are consistent. Developing a level-headed motive and progression that follows, the major conflict compliments each part of the story. Given this has an already established name, franchise, and characters, for what this screen time was given, there was little information that was rushed or left out. While there will always be a fair share of sped-up aspects and moments that feel slightly out of place, the sophisticated and personal tone this evolves easily brushes past it. With intense and realistic action and a perfectly on cue comedic script, there is little this film has that's not entertaining. This fresh outlook on a familiar franchise not only provides a solid film but an enjoyable watch. 8/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 8/10
|
Mad Max: Fury Road
Storyline:
In a post-apocalyptic wasteland, a woman rebels against a tyrannical ruler in search of her homeland and haven. Arguably ranking as one of the most overrated films within the past few years, Mad Max: Fury Road is nothing but non-stop stunts and artsy directing to show off what technology the original trilogy didn't have. Rolling with an already established idea and character to fully re-make, this has no individual thought. Striving to reconstruct a screenplay with all the same plot points, there is a complete disregard for the fact it had already been done right the first time. With no pizzaz or whirlwind concepts to transform this into something independent, it's running off the fumes of its household name. Although something has to be said for the cohesive cinematography, as it is inarguably descriptive. Creating unity among the color scheme, lighting, and progression, the picture is striking. Across the film, though having its enthralling moments, the heavy feeling of being thrown into a no-development plot catches up by the finale. Centering characters around a story without substance, a visually pleasing product can only take you so far. 6/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 6/10
|
Mad Max:
Storyline:
In a self-destructing world, a vengeful Australian policeman sets out to stop a violent motorcycle gang. No matter how outdated some scenes may become within this film, Mad Max is a classic, must-see that set the tone for films in the future. With an oversimplified and schematic plot, there is little this strives for, yet is successful with it all. Having a low budget and working with what it has, creates a visually depicting story that is quite unobtainable with products today. Centering around an intuitive protagonist that is restless and determined, Mel Gibson portrays a grim reality. Straightforward, but persuasive, his performance is frankly quiet but telling. Not to mention the impressive stunts, action, and choreography this entails, while corny after the fact, they're still appreciable and entertaining. Given this has no choice but to be daring with its costumes, directing, and score, though significant, they're authoritative. Making a statement with all it embodies, this film is monumental from both a cinematic note and entertainment standpoint, which deserves a watch at least once in everyone's lifetime. 8.5/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 8.5/10
|
The Forever Purge:
Storyline:
All the rules are broken as a sect of lawless marauders decides that the annual Purge does not stop at daybreak and instead should never end. While the problems within this film lie in more issues than just one, this predominately gives up before it even starts when it loses touch on reality. Forcefully trying to have a political agenda behind a concept that is not strong enough, this becomes too complicated for a story that is set up for nothing more than entertainment. Alternatively, though this can get quite tedious at times, the action keeps you on your toes. Dwindling the fear to nothing besides a few jump scares, this in turn, goes for more of guns and glory than anything scary. All in all, this franchise, along with plenty of others needs to be stopped. Losing every ounce of originality and filling every moment with terrible performances, this is not only cheaply made but isn't an enjoyable idea anymore. Not to mention the re-recording of the majority of lines and the poor post-production mixing, it's just simply hard to enjoy this film. 3/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 3/10
|
Lethal Weapon 4:
Storyline:
Riggs and Murtaugh must contend with deadly Chinese triads that are trying to free their former leaders out of prison and onto American soil. Given this film opens with a bang and is as true to the characters that you can get, the rest that follows isn't as prominent. Delivering a moderate script that does not have the same energy and feeling like there isn't much excitement from anyone involved shapes Lethal Weapon 4 into what is hopefully the last film before it ruins the name of an enjoyable franchise. Acting upon a heavily seasoned concept, this comes as no surprise it was too easily predictable, and quite frankly, uninspiring. Continuously doing the same things over and over again, although entertaining at the moment, is too foreseeable and expected. Even so, no matter how unglamorous this may become, it still has its clever comedic timing to keep you going. All things aside, while this ends on a solidifying note that captures the end of an era, it just didn't need to be made. Consistently fighting throughout its. entire screen time to prove itself to still be funny, upbeat, and wholesome, it becomes average and mellow than anything else. 5/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 5.5/10
|
Lethal Weapon 3:
Storyline:
Riggs and Murtaugh pursue a former LAPD officer who steals and sells confiscated guns and ammunition to local street gangs. While this series undoubtedly gets worse throughout time, it comes more as losing its touch on the classic storyline rather than creating a solely bad film. Still executing the intuitive conflicts and laughable script, Lethal Weapon 3 may be entertaining but is nothing more. Bringing back the consistent, lovable characters that are still the same, this picks up right where it left off. Yet, this time, the same adventure once more brings the notion of not needing to be made. Leaving behind the importance of the fundamental need of relevance this strived off of does not ruin the name, rather pushes it to the point where they’re not the creative, fun, and well made films anymore. Not to mention adding more characters and big names feel more like a buy-in than a requirement. Easily falling into the pit of Hollywood franchises, just about every pragmatic and down-to-earth moment these included are upgraded by its business counterpart, not its once original idealism -- thus creating films you continue to see but aren't anything worthwhile. 5.5/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 6/10
|
Lethal Weapon 2:
Storyline:
Riggs and Murtaugh are on the trail of South African diplomats who are using their immunity to engage in criminal activities. For being a sequel or simply standing alone, this second edition to a classic franchise is surprisingly unpredictable and sticks to what it knows best. Bringing back the same clear tone that keeps this afloat, there is the nostalgic witty humor and easy banter. Although there is something to be said that it's not as good as the first, it doesn't mean there isn't the same innovative and fresh concept this brings to the table. Providing a detailed and in-depth plot, the storyline develops a quite intuitive turn of events that always keeps you on your toes. Proving to have relevance with the fair share of corny moments, this thoroughly authenticates its relevance to its character arcs while keeping you entertained in the meantime. While the only criticisms come as a little too overwhelming happy ending and not being as unorthodox as the first, Lethal Weapon 2 is a solid production. Being completely unconventional and featuring the same, expected and natural chemistry, this becomes another must-see. 7/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 8/10
|
Lethal Weapon:
Storyline:
Two newly paired cops who are complete opposites must put aside their differences to catch a gang of drug smugglers. Acting upon completely organic chemistry, this thrives by being a breath of fresh air. Delivering a fresh and unique concept, Lethal Weapon is not only entertaining but isn't given as much credit for how well made it is. Being equally corny and comical, there is easily too many things to love within this franchise. The dedication to the difference in characters, working relationships, and how effortlessly everything is coherently blended, if anything, this feels like living in the moment rather than something crafted on paper. However, this straightforwardly has its ungodly moments. Between its few, but notable, outdated stunts and subject matter, there are a few characteristics that showcase its old-world construction. Yet, without a doubt, the humorous and charming banter prevails, as it complements the majority of the realistic action. Nevertheless, it's naive to think a film made decades ago wouldn't contain some questionable moments or foreseeable dialogue. Regardless, this indisputably is a must-see, surely can please any movie-goer, and mostly, is a rewatchable, compelling story. 8/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 8/10
|
A Quiet Place Part II:
Storyline:
Forced to venture into the unknown, the Abbott family now faces the terrors of the outside world as they continue to fight for survival in silence. Crafting an exquisitely tasteful opening sequence, while it's without a doubt the best portion of the film, the rest that follows is not as substantial. Delivering the same edge that is guaranteed, A Quiet Place Part II in turn doesn't have the nimble, driven fear of the first. However, the illustrative directing and striking tone blend seamlessly together for an enticing picture. Captivating the audience in any given moment, the dedicated and committed involvement makes the watch as personable and intense as possible. Regardless, this is an impeccable theater experience and cinematic picture. Despite the expected, unforgettable score and keen performances, the issues lie within redoing a story that was already well crafted and embellishing on details that didn't need to be developed further. Ending with a cliche that feels too simple for the characters, this sequel is not as devoted or original to be highly recommendable. 6.5/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 6.5/10
|
Pitch Perfect:
Storyline:
Beca, a freshman at Barden University, joins an all-girl Acappella group, The Barden Bellas, as they compete against other Acappella groups. With clever screenwriting and great execution, Pitch Perfect succeeds with its quirky and much-needed creativity. Although quite odd and not the ideal thought for a comedy, the talent included makes it a must-see. No matter how stupid this may be, there is no denying it's catchy. Playing its cards right, the comedy and musical aspects blend seamlessly, making for an easy-going, feel-good film. Throwing in the well-expected and overly dramatic moments, there never seems to be a dull moment to keep you engaged. However, while this is all for good fun and certainly succeeds, the pacing has its issues. Going from one idea to the next, dropping one subplot to go to another, more things become noticeable rather than looking past. Nevertheless, this is a fun comedy for someone of any age, has a captivating and popular soundtrack, and is comfortably a rewatchable film despite its minor problems. 6/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 7.5/10
|
The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader
Storyline:
King Caspian is on a quest to find the seven lost Lords of Telmar and needs Lucy and Edmunds's help to do so. Despite this film having its largely apparent issues and wraps up a trilogy that's easy to forget, The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader is surprisingly entertaining for what it's worth. Diving into the fantasy and youthful perspective the second film tried to create, this succeeds in developing a spry world to live in within its runtime. Additionally, bringing back the lovable characters with the foreseeable and anticipated dialogue, there is much nostalgia within. That being said, don't let the positives fool, as the major continuity issues and poor performances shine just as bright. Giving the same, if not more, plot lines left unfinished and a lack of emotion from characters, this provides an amateur ambiance that halts it from being anything more. However, this film thrives with its upbeat progression, short screen time, and light subject matter, which only succeeds by the absence of a plot. Failing to tell a story, this, in turn, is a combination of scenes that don't have much correlation and relies on its already established name to carry it along. 4/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 5.5/10
|
The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian
Storyline:
One year after their previous adventure, the Pevensie children return to Narnia and join forces with Prince Caspian to overthrow the evil King Miraz. Although it comes as no surprise that this sequel can't quite grasp the feeling the first succeeded with and feels more unnecessary than anything, The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian is modestly unconfident in its doings. Leading the film with wasted and dumbed-down performances, the absence of spunk across the board is as observable as it is unsteady. Without the drive of honest portrayals or anticipation from their conflicts, this quickly becomes a bland watch. Becoming childish in all the wrong ways, this can't find the sweet spot between a fantasy child film and an action/drama. Trying to do both halfway is where it goes wrong - failing to become too dark and gritty while simultaneously not playing into the fun youthful perspective it has, the inconsistency meets the two at a hesitant point. Aside from the simple fact this was a fail in many critical ways, the weirdly implemented romance subplot and exaggerated runtime make this film unmemorable. 4/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 5/10
|
Divergent:
Storyline:
Discovering a plot to destroy Divergents, Tris and Four must find out what makes Divergents dangerous before it's too late. Driven from a novel that is directed by a designated pace, this adaptation to the big screen is nowhere close to being well-made and is not quite as similar as it thinks it is. Leading the film with stiff and wooden performances all around is as noticeable as it is painful to get through. Truthfully delivering lines with no emotion and depicting awkward and uncomfortable instances, this happens too often to see past, even with a corny heart. Nevertheless, the pace is consistent and makes for a semi-entertaining watch, for what it's worth. Having the predictable, but fulfilling romantic trope and creating a world throughout its runtime, this has its moments that aren't as heavy as the rest. While this is nothing to be proud of and arguably ruins the name, with an open mind and some effort, this can be enjoyable for the targeted audience. Having worse things within the genre or book-based films, this finds a mix of romance, action, and drama. 4/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 5.5/10
|
Mortal Kombat:
Storyline:
MMA fighter Cole Young seeks out Earth's greatest champions to stand a chance against the enemies from Outworld. Consisting of terrible acting and rocky storytelling, Mortal Kombat succeeds in the highly anticipated action but fails in making it cinematic. Never capturing a tone, there was too much happening at once to soak in everything. Mortal Kombat fans will find a way to enjoy this film nevertheless, as noticeable incorporations of well-loved aspects were used correctly. However, no matter a fan or not, there was a lack of planning on all accounts. The shortcoming in including all unconditional aspects from the game, the section that was left to create a plot was impromptu. The purely planned and executed choreography was entertaining and attention stealing. Giving the in-depth and intense strategized picture, this was as realistic as it was consuming. Adding in bits of slo-mo without overdoing, this played its strong suits well and developed an enjoyable watch. That being said, the absence of a coherent or arranged plot makes for a jumbled and emotionless story. Well-produced CGI and action sequences can only go so far, as this clearly milks the already established name for views rather than providing anything special. 5/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 6/10
|
Mortal Kombat - 1995:
Storyline:
Three unknowing martial artists are summoned to a mysterious island to compete in a tournament that will decide the fate of the world. Considering a film centered around fighting, this has extremely poor choreography and special effects. Even for the time this was made, there was wasted potential due to a faulty presentation of details. Possessing more plot holes than any theme or consistency, the construction of this film roots from the established name to carry it along. Even so, at the same time, this manages to give nothing to the Mortal Kombat fans either. Bringing in well-loved characters, no details, personality, or individuality came with, instead just a name. Struggling to create a plot worth watching and action worth the name of Mortal Kombat, this is hard to get through. Expecting nothing less than wooden performances and dull dialogue, this still finds a way to be overly predictable and lifeless. Giving merely a tolerable watch, not one, but all characteristics were stiff and unenjoyable, uncovering a plot that was shot from the start and a product that is not worth anyone's time. 2/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 2/10
|
Beverly Hills Cop:
Storyline:
After his childhood friend is murdered, a rebellious Detroit cop, Axel Foley follows the leads of his case to Beverly Hills. Considering how dumb this is, Beverly Hills Cop is quite a well-made film. Proving to be more than the dim-witted comedy, this is without a doubt humorous, but original. Admirably cast, these performances set in motion an efficient vibe for what's to come. Centering around a character that has more to offer than just this one film, the execution of each portion of the story makes for an always intriguing but never overpowering plot. Let alone the persona of Eddie Murphy and the immensely witty script that compliments him, there's the fair share of stupid, slapstick jokes in addition to one-liners that you can't help but laugh at. While this is all in fun and taking it for what it's worth, this is enjoyable enough to say that the majority of it is worthwhile regardless if it's levelheaded. Never outdating itself, just about everything this offers is pleasing. Purely just an enjoyable action-comedy, there are more things to like within this than to not - furthermore, not everything has to be so stiff and serious to be good. 7/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 7.5/10
|
Godzilla vs Kong:
Storyline:
With humanity caught in the middle of Godzilla and Kong's epic battle, they are pinned against each other. Despite that this did not need to be made, was poorly produced, and forced a concept within a jumbled plot, this was at least visually entertaining. Given the premise of this, it was moderately believable under the circumstances. Showcasing the front-running focus on what was interesting, while the ending was blown a little too far out of proportion, something has to be said for the quite lifelike graphics. With two established characters, their presence and fighting choreography were not only well-planned but intricate. That being said, whether it was not high on the radar or there simply was not care for it, the acting was dreadful. Truthfully depicting some of the worst, dull performances, it was hard to watch. Between random dialogue that didn't make sense and forced subplots, Godzilla vs. Kong failed in just about every aspect. Only proving itself through its visuals, this film creates a progression that is difficult to keep yourself reeled in for the entire duration. Feeling as though there was no effort from any performances or screenwriting, the only reason this is a "box office hit" is because there is nothing else out - save yourself the time, as this is not worth it. 3/10
3/10
|
Godzilla: King of the Monsters
Storyline:
When god-sized monsters have a new king, the world's existence is in jeopardy when they come to his rule. The acting felt as though no one tried to put effort into their performance because the storyline was doomed from the start. Considering the majority of the film was action and the much-needed dialogue was absent, the lines were incredibly scripted, rigid, and most of all, anticipated. The pacing, additionally, was all over the place. Whether a backstory or other random supporting details, they were either introduced at the wrong time or were too quickly passed over. The action was non-stop and too crazy to even enjoy while the screen time progressed. Beginning to be the same thing over and over again with no variance or transitions between any aspects, it was a tiring watch. Too many things happening at once, not a balance or tone between genres, poor performances, and more, all contributed to Godzilla: King of the Monsters to be an unentertaining film that was extremely sloppy. 3/10
The BAM! rating is a newly integrated rating scale in addition to the critic rating each film gets. BAM! is simply the entertainment value that is solely based on whether or not a film is worth watching. A film can have a high BAM! rating and a low critic rating or vice versa. 3/10
|
Kong: Skull Island
Storyline:
After the Vietnam war, a team of scientists explore an uncharted island in the Pacific, only to find the land belongs to Kong. Creating this film from an already established name, the construction didn't establish a consistent vibe throughout, implementing an unwanted and rocky progression that is only the start of its problems. While this has things to offer like interesting special effects, entertaining action, and an established soundtrack, these positive aspects were hard to pick out, as they were presented poorly. Bringing in music when it wasn't needed, though it was fitting, the timing was not. Along with the action/CGI, given it was intense and realistic, it wasn't attainable to make the concept practical as it was a hodgepodge of content thrown on the audience at any given time. Having an excessive amount of star power, the focus ventured to the ridiculous amount of characters with no time to develop. Diving into subplots that took away from the center of attention that needed the screen time, there was no time management, which makes for messy characters. Kong: Skull Island has a few hidden aspects that can make this watchable, but it mostly is just a re-make that struggled to find its voice. 4/10
5.5/10
|
Maze Runner: The Death Cure
Storyline:
For their final mission, Thomas and the rest must break into the Last City to rescue their friends and get answers from WCKD. Opening the film from the get-go with engaging action sets a more polished tone for the story to follow. While this has a dramatic and unspoken shift from the previous installments, though noticeable and not correlated, it propels the film to be able to finish the continuous conflict. That being said, the lack of characteristics correlating yet again is nonexistent. Including pointless characters and/or aspects to the plot by giving them screen time but no direction makes for a hodgepodge of aspects compiled together. While this comes as no surprise at this point, it makes for the turning point to not be impactful. When push comes to shove, this series fails to effectively depict emotions, provide a cohesive plot, and make actions seem relevant. By not having anything consistent ranging from the three films, each gives a different feeling, which makes for a non-relatable and weak storyline. Though built up and treated in higher regard than what it's worth, the climax and finale were unfulfilling. Despite ruining the ongoing character development, this also finds a way to be excessively run on without giving many details. All in all, Maze Runner: The Death Cure is an average story that closes off a non-notable trilogy. 5.5/10
6/10
|
Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials
Storyline:
After breaking out of the maze, the Glaiders now are on the run trying to find the truth about WCKD. Even though this took a major downfall cinematically, this sequel isn't even mildly attention holding. Losing the heart of the story, taking a journey that did not correlate between each act, and providing little to no positive aspects, The Scorch Trials struggles to stay afloat, standing alone and within the series. Taking a path of overpowering subplots and not knowing what to focus on as the viewer, the true conflict that's sought is masked by having too much information presented at once. Not to mention the majority of the nitty-gritty and guts of the film were pointless, presenting a new issue every few minutes didn't give the plot the time it needed to develop any given aspect. Proving to have no plot points, relevance, or purpose, not only does this take the first film for granted, but it uses its runtime poorly. Still having the same dim-witted, foreseeable script, this was constructed from a standpoint of wanting a paycheck from the loyal fans rather than putting in the work where it counts. Being below-average entertaining and not even matching what was done well, to begin with, this simply is just not a good film. 4.5/10
5.5/10
|
The Maze Runner:
Storyline:
Being sent into the glade with no memory, Thomas, along with the others trapped in a maze have to work together to escape and uncover the truth. Although this is nothing special, nor is it a must-see, The Maze Runner is a distracting and entertaining film. Thriving from the antsy build up, slowly acquiring information, and an intense turn of events, this is by far the best out of the trilogy and stays quite faithful to the book. It is clear this is made for fun and nothing cinematic, as it plays its cards heavily on the development of characters, relationships, and conflicts, rather than a well-written story. Having a lack of clarity and common sense, while the action was without a doubt engaging and the visual focus, it was driven from a falsified concept that never achieves either an authentic or hoax-like feeling. Moreover, stocked with short, flat bits of dialogue that were predictable to every line, the cohesion between all the elements was not strong. Though this kills the tone and sophistication of the story, the performances were just about the only thing holding on. Providing genuine and convincing portrayals, the connections on screen transfer to the audience and stabilize the film. This trilogy is one that didn't need to be transferred to film, however, as many adaptations go horrifically wrong, this could have been worse. Knowing what you're in for with this type of future dystopian plot, it's appealing for its screen time. 6.5/10
6.5/10
|
The Equalizer 2:
Storyline:
Robert McCall is back again, quietly giving terrible people what they deserve. When someone close to him is murdered, everything changes. Compared to the first plot, this was a money grab made to further future installments, rather than continuing the high impact creative idea this once had. Losing the fast pace, unpredictability, and antsy progression, The Equalizer 2 is just another sequel that didn't need to be made and is easily forgotten. Throughout the entire film, no characters or subject matter was practical to either the protagonist or the plot. With no sense of relatability from the characters and a lack of authenticity from any given moment contributed to the rocky flow that halts the development. Although the screen time felt long and run on, the plot felt rushed. With just about every scene dragging on, giving no details or information to the viewer creates the overwhelming feeling that this had no direction. Teamed with a storyline that has no depth past the surface (or characters for that matter), this was aimlessly throwing characteristics around trying to find its way. Overall, this sequel was relying on the high ratings and hype of the first installment to get people in the door. While the name is not enough to save this film and not to mention the awkward and unneeded camera angles thrown in the last act, this had a dull story, non-intriguing action, and was as predictable as you can get. 6/10
6/10
|
The Equalizer:
Storyline:
A man who has put his mysterious past behind him cannot stand by when he meets a young girl that is taken advantage of by Russian gangsters. Although this is a familiar storyline, this was executed well to provide high-intensity action with a creative twist. Having a believable protagonist that carries the film, his authenticity and secrets initiate the involving plot this takes you on. Adding individualized aspects within the story makes for a fearful character that roots from revenge and meticulous skill. Becoming undoubtfully creative, the characteristics within the protagonist are ambiguous but slowly show themselves. Longing for extra details, there is certainly context and relevance, but it's from a discreetly resourceful individual. That being said, the film itself has some bumps along the way. Including an antagonist who is on a pedestal in terms of being feared, the feeling was not mutual upon meeting him. Not spending enough time on showing the important details, instead, this thought words spoke louder than actions, which was a major downfall. While this falls into a rut of tacky direction and editing, The Equalizer might struggle with a few cinematic errors but thrives with an innovative protagonist that sets the mood for this enjoyable revenge film. 6/10
7.5/10
|
The King's Man:
Storyline:
In the early years of the 20th century, the Kingsman agency is formed to stand against a cabal plotting a war to wipe out millions. Proving that this film has absolutely no relevance throughout either the franchise or on its own, The King's Man utilizes its household name to get people into the theater and nothing more. The utter insufficiency of details and therefore lack of a well-thought-out story set in motion a film that did not need to be made. Featuring characters that are neither as energetic nor with the delicacy like the rest of the series captures effortlessly, this does not feel like an active part of the series. Alternatively, this changes something that wasn't broken: the Kingsman formula. This rather keeps specific details the same and switches all the good parts - its sophistication, wit, and originality. Not to mention the trailer showcasing the gist of the entire film, this finds a way to separate itself from the audience in every possible way. From distanced leads to sprucing up aspects that did not need to be refreshed, it's hard to be engaged in a story that has no one or thing to feel as one with. I will say as I've said many, many times: Hollywood will continue to make films and ruin franchises solely for the payout, not a good film, which is a perfect representation of The King's Man. 4/10
5/10
|
Kingsman: The Golden Circle
Storyline:
After the Kingman's headquarters and agents are killed, an allied spy organization in the United States is discovered to help destroy a common enemy. Although this doesn't top its previous, it doesn't ruin the name and is still fun enough to be an enjoyable sequel. Bringing back the same energy with lovable characters, in addition to providing authentic new additions, Kingsman: The Golden Circle is not top of the line cinematically but is an exciting watch. Providing the matched high-intensity action/comedy that’s involving and personal, this addition lacks the consistent realistic factor when doing so. Given that not every situation reigns true to this, as many scenes are worth talking about and are quite stylish, the majority go above and beyond in a disappointing way. Trying to do more with the plot than what it had in store, adding one too many antagonists became messy. Though each character served their purpose, the lack of development and throwing too much onto the viewer made this fall into a cliche and predictable plot, which in turn, is the downfall. Undoubtedly still entertaining, this instead lacks the unspoken unique and differentiating factor it once had. Feeling more of a money grab than having a true purpose within the series, this didn't need to be made but is still a funny and refreshing watch. 6/10
7/10
|
The Godfather:
Storyline:
Set in the 1940s, a New York Mafia family struggles to protect their empire while switching leadership from father to son. Considering the time this was made, The Godfather creates the genre, vibe, and story that mobster films follow. Being the first story to truly create such a distinctive theme and showcase the individuality that requires patience and development, this sets the basis that everything else follows. However, though it is without question that everyone needs to see this at least once in their life, seeing it once is definitely enough, nor does it hide the fact that this is unnecessarily long. While I enjoyed the elements that came with each portion of the story, when combined, it felt that each section didn't correlate with the other the further you get. More as two films combined into one, although everything is important, it's not as cohesive as I would wish. Regardless of my small negative, the performances are remarkable. The raw and unsettling adaptations from Marlon Brando and Al Pacino, simply stated, are just cinematic. Being utterly devoted, the chilling and substantial execution from both leading roles create a stunning reality. Having a story that is nothing close to bare, actors that provide gripping characters, and an all-around groundbreaking film, this is not praised by many without deserving it. 9/10
7/10
|
Romancing the Stone:
Storyline:
A romance novelist is thrown into a real-life adventure when she travels to Columbia to save her sister, who will be killed if a treasure map is not delivered to her captors. Romancing the Stone brings more than what first meets the eye. While this may seem like just the average 80s film, as it is in many ways, it easily tells a story that keeps you on your toes until it's finished, even with its fair share of awkward moments. While this story is overly naive and foreshadowing, that's the draw this has over its contenders - it embraces its cheesiness and effortlessly creates a story because of it. Having a well-written plot effectively creates a tone that captures the attention of its audience. Creating in-depth characters without losing its humor, the feeling is never heavy, yet still gives a satisfying vibe. It is unavoidable to have scenes that aren't cringy from this era, yet they become laughable and even add to the high BAM! factor this film has. However, as corny as these select scenes may become, this is cohesive with the rest of the film, which is the consistent factor that this runs on. It features a variety of random aspects such as subplots, lack of backstories, and romance, just to name a few, yet they were never distracting. The reliable-feeling this gives off makes for a not-so-predictable, predictable storyline to fulfill anyone's movie watching needs. 6.5/10
7.5/10
|
Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore
Storyline:
Albus Dumbledore assigns Newt and his allies with a mission related to the rising power of Grindelwald. While I am fully disclosing that I should have refreshed my memory with the previous films in the series before watching this latest adaptation, even an active recollection of specifics wouldn't have been enough to save this hodgepodge of details that were thrown in and called a film. Never has a magical world felt as boring as these films. Sucking all the life out of the familiar feeling the fans have grown to love, there is nothing left within this story to be enjoyable. While I am all for having the separation and clear distinction between the Harry Potter franchise and the Fantastic Beasts spinoff, this finds a way to feel like a poor remake of something we've all seen before in a confusing manner. From character introductions/reprises that are overly meaningless to the stiff dialogue they express, simply stated, nothing is thought out or executed well. These wooden individuals, whom we are supposed to connect with, fall nowhere close to an attachment. Thus setting in motion themes that are as unaffecting as they are poorly developed and lifeless characters who are trying to represent them. Though I have nothing but praise regarding the stellar special effects, which never fail to amaze me with their creativity, when that is the only positive one can find, it makes it that less impactful. Losing every ounce of suspension of disbelief and distinctive tone these films once had, it's quite saddening to see such a nostalgic concept be ruined with time. Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore uses its name to make money and forgets every aspect that a magical story should incorporate. 4/10
4/10
|
Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald
Storyline:
In an effort to stop Grindelwald’s plans of pure-blood wizards to take over non-magical beings, Dumbledore calls his former student, Newt, to save the world. Coming from the first Fantastic Beasts, to which I was not a fan of, nothing has changed, as I am not wowed, to say the least. The Harry Potter series is eventful, interesting, and created its own world that invites the audience to live in. Sadly, opposing to this, rather than creating something individualized, it feels like nothing more than an opportunity to make money. Simply put, nothing was accomplished with this. Absolutely nothing happened in the story at any point in time with any character. Being a pointless storyline, this is the start of a franchise that has no purpose. Johnny Depp was shockingly awful. His appearance, expressions, deliverance of lines, etc., all were incredibly fake and forced. Being both extremely dissatisfied with the antagonist and especially Depp as an actor, he was not the only one who struggled. The lack of information and underdevelopment from everyone involved puts a wall between the relatability to characters. Lastly, this has no correlation to anything within the wizard world or the film before this. Anyone could watch with no knowledge of the franchise and completely understand; this was disappointing and aggravating as any Harry Potter fan knows, the exciting part is the details and story following from film to film. 4/10
4/10
|
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part II
Storyline:
Harry, Ron, and Hermione find and destroy the last Horcruxes before Harry and Voldemort's final battle at Hogwarts. Having this take place exactly where the first part left off makes for an adrenaline rush that answers lingering questions and seals the deal for the franchise. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part II is surprisingly one of the best within the series and features a more cinematic finish to end on a high note. While the build-up regarding the series long conflict is non-negotiable in terms of it being needed for development, it did not disappoint. Although I think the last two films could have been condensed into one (even if it was a money grab over the purpose of it being needed) the two feature a different vibe that leaves the antagonist/protagonist showdown room to be the center of attention and never missing details. Despite getting an answer to the clash that has been the drive for seven films prior, the development of supporting characters and missing links throughout time is incredibly satisfying. Being showcased in a sophisticated and clear way, this film draws in the audience entirely by not being excessively long and doing the most with its time on screen. The Harry Potter series is one everyone needs to watch at some point in their lives. 8/10
8/10
|
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part I
Storyline:
Harry, Ron, and Hermione set out to destroy the Horcruxes - the source of Voldemort's immortality; both Harry and Voldemort prepare for their showdown. Being a drastic change with the makeup of this film, this creates much more of a cinematic image without losing its heart. Having this become a mix of a slow burn and an antsy thriller reels you in with a dark and gritty storyline; Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part I may not be as interactive or energetic as the films prior, yet is incredibly intense in a more sophisticated manner. Just about every other scene faded to black, which was quite apparent after a while, it becomes something to talk about due to the fact it is incredibly uncorrelated to the other installments. Not to mention this aspect being slightly overused, it never hinders the audience's enjoyment, rather just could be toned down in retrospect to the rest of the crisp editing and directing. While this is a developmental stepping stone, more elements than not shifted to a polished tone in comparison to the preceding films. Marking the beginning to the end of a franchise that is loved among many, this has its edge of your seat worthy moments in addition to the heartbreaking ones. 8/10
8/10
|
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince:
Storyline:
Hogwarts is no longer a safe place for students, as Death Eaters are swarming the school grounds; Dumbledore is adamantly preparing Harry for his final battle with Voldemort. While this marks more of a sophisticated based story and focuses on the development/maturity of lead characters, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince fails to hold its ground in being a cohesive film. Even by having the last act save the day from the rest of the not-so-satisfying film, this wasn't anything special in terms of comparing it to the others. This sixth installment had more screen-time for the dark subject matter that has slowly been brewing throughout the franchise, which was as fulling as it was anticipating. Though, with that being said, this was filled wasting away the time on screen with the majority of aspects being random and only a select few minutes with the important stuff. Regardless of the connection between these two, the main points were expressed to the audience in the end anyway. While it's easy to point out that this wasn't the best within the franchise, it still is a good watch. Having the somewhat cheesy dialogue that is expected, characters everyone loves, and the suspense of an unpredictable conflict, this doesn't fail to provide an entertaining story. 7/10
7/10
|
Harry Potter and the Order of Phoenix:
Storyline:
With the students at Hogwarts not knowing the truth of Harry and Voldemort's encounter, paired with a new and cruel professor, Harry takes matters into his own hands with his classmates. While this may be a much-needed addition in terms of development within the series, Harry Potter and the Order of Phoenix is not as entertaining as the rest and fights to hold its ground as a balanced film. The introductory sequence was neither anticipating nor cohesive. Having random shaky camera work and throwing the audience into an odd-feeling situation disrupts the process that an opening should have had. From there on out, each act felt separated from the rest, killing any sort of flow this might have had. On contrary, the climax was thoroughly involving. Again, although it felt distant and non-relating to the rest, the action and wizard-focused aspects were realistic and worthwhile. In this section alone, performances were superb and the editing was crisp, overall setting the pace for the upcoming film. All in all, this fifth installment of the Harry Potter franchise was not bad by any means, rather was incoherent and lacked the details of the story these normally have. The last act immensely tries to make up for the rest of the film but isn't enough to make this one the best out of all; however, this still falls into the category of a must-see. 7/10
7/10
|
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire:
Storyline:
The upcoming and dangerous tournament between three schools of magic draws only three students to compete; Harry is chosen as a fourth contestant, though he was ineligible to enter, he must compete. Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire is in a contest for the best in the franchise. Coming from the previous films that develop more of a wholesome, family film feel, this installment thrives from a thriller/mystery driven plot by an alluring focus of attention. While I'm beginning to sound like a broken record, all Harry Potter films are elaborately long; be that as it may, this is the first to accurately space out its runtime. Between the gripping introduction of the antagonist's power, the conflicts, and the development, this never overpowers its audience in one aspect. Having an equal amount of anticipation, grief, and satisfaction, the action is intense, but balances out the storyline. Having the leeway in this film to bring in new, in-depth characters, in addition to already established ones, this fourth installment to the Harry Potter film is incredibly significant. Having fun characteristics and an enjoyable flow, not only is this film the start to this series becoming more cinematically inclined, but more involving throughout time. 8/10
8/10
|
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban:
Storyline:
Harry is nervous when the prisoner, Sirus Black, escapes and is out to get him. Dementors are sent to Hogwarts to protect him and others, but he is left to figure things out on his own. As with each installment, the plot gets better and better with each film. Having a twist that gives more information throughout its screen time makes for an unexpected turn of events. Admittedly, this film in particular feels exceedingly lengthy until the last act. While this doesn't fail to please once getting through its story, it can lose its hold on the audience halfway through. Again, including characteristics that are only suited toward Harry Potter, this thrives in creating and living in its world that is utterly creative. Featuring the still corny CGI, this was heavily based on the plot, rather than the crazy aspects it showcases. So for the majority of it's random, yet interesting special effects, they were pretty believable, as they complimented the character development this focused on. Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban pleases fans with a more investing plot, new and old characters that deliver with their distinctive personalities, and inventing an incomparable world. This isn't the best within the series but is a much needed developmental stepping stone. 7/10
7.5/10
|
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets:
Storyline:
An elf visits Harry to tell him not to attend Hogwarts, as a danger is waiting for him; nothing can prepare him for the mystery and trouble that awaits him. Coming from the first installment, as the basis of the plot was already set, there was more room to develop the conflict that comes with it. While this was a strong suit within, this began to lose focus of everything as a whole and lacked in CGI and performances. The problems with the CGI is not across the board, rather individual aspects, which is even worse. Some scenes, like the magic and spells, were done extremely well, feeling as real as it was unique. However, when it came to characteristics like the flying car and the spiders, it was tough to watch with an entertaining eye, as it was just too falsely constructed to enjoy. Yet, the storyline created questions that were answered with suspense and anticipation. Though some scenes/lines felt stiff, the overall course of getting to the destination of the climax was one worth watching. Adding distinctive qualities that can only be done within the Harry Potter world, the faults this had were less than its strengths. Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets is still incredibly fun - featuring a script that is both wholesome and humorous, bringing back beloved characters and has a unique feeling. While some technical issues arise, they're no deal-breakers, and this, and all the films within this franchise, is worth your time. 7/10
7.5/10
|
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone:
Storyline:
An 11-year-old orphan discovers he's a wizard and goes to Hogwarts, a boarding school for wizards. There, he befriends other wizards and learns about the death of his parents. While this is incredibly popular and mainstreamed among all, it's for a good reason. Filled with lovable characters, a unique subject matter, and a compelling plot, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone is the first installment of a series that gets better throughout time. Featuring great costumes and makeup, though possibly as Science Fiction as a film can get, it always achieved a rational feeling. Creating its world within its screen time, this idea holds your attention and is captivating. However, no matter how intriguing this may be, it is incredibly long. While feeling even lengthier than what it is, the time was used with good intentions, yet still makes me check the time more than once. At the end of the day, this has great performances from young actors, who truly showcase their talent, cheesy CGI (but in an interesting way), and an overall vibe for the franchise that is unmatched; the Harry Potter films are altogether worth anyone's time. 7.5/10
7.5/10
|
The Bourne Supremacy:
Storyline:
When Jason Bourne is framed for a CIA operation gone awry, he is forced to resume his former life as a trained assassin to survive. Following from a film that is the epitome of a constant in-the-moment story, The Bourne Supremacy does not top the origin but is an honorable addition to the series. With three distinct acts, this stays within its limits and plays out an evenly paced plot. Complemented by natural storytelling, this has a tone and progression that showcases what simple, but balanced characteristics can create. Yet the overly shaky camera work and non-stop music don't give the script and the film space to do the work. Trying to achieve too many opinions at once, there was a much-needed presence among the absence of silence, downtime, and intensity for the audience to decide what they think, not the film telling them. Being a satisfying and relevant watch, both a solid sequel and a relevant screenplay, this film is compelling, practical, and overall just simply entertaining. 7/10
7.5/10
|
The Bourne Identity:
Storyline:
A man suffers from amnesia, not knowing who he is, but having an extraordinary set of skills in fighting and self-defense. Being chased by assassins along the way, he sets out to discover his past. Being put from the get-go into a story where the protagonist is learning the same information as the audience, is incredibly anticipating. Having the lack of information slowly and imperfectly being pieced together makes for an in-the-moment, eager ride. The high-intensity action is outstandingly involving. From every moment on screen, whether calm or heated, driven by the passionate lead performance of Matt Damon, the vibe is consuming. Having a dedicated and concentrated storyline, the central idea never leaves the focus of attention. Including subplots that only helped details fall into place, each character provided relevance as well as their individualized personalities. The Bourne Identity makes the audience feel for the protagonist no matter what emotions are on screen. Creating an action/thriller that can entertain anyone from any genre, this succeeds by executing on a creative idea, providing a stellar lead performance, and making an edge-of-your-seat feeling type of story. 8/10
8/10
|
F9: The Fast Saga
Storyline:
Cipher enlists the help of Jakob, Dom's younger brother to take revenge on Dom and his team. F9: The Fast Saga utterly loses the heart of the story, focuses on all the wrong details, and sincerely ruins the name of the franchise with a completely useless and unentertaining film. Bringing too many characters back and casting too much star power, everyone's presence is overwhelming. Trying to do more than what the plot is good for showcases dead-end subplots that are more pointless than nostalgic to see fan-favorite characters. Furthermore, without the cheesy but enjoyable family plot that was missing, the action wasn't there to save the day. Featuring less and less action screen time with each film, the selected stunts are nothing to be proud of. Going over-the-top with the already over-the-top (but allowed) action from this series, there are just more things to critique than to allow yourself to wrap your head around. On top of it all, there was a heavy feeling of no one seeming to care about this. From noticeable continuity issues to painfully stiff dialogue, there is sadly nothing this gets right. While I will without a doubt continue to see these films, they lost their touch of a good bad film and should have stopped at Furious 7. 3/10
3/10
|
The Fate of the Furious:
Storyline:
A mysterious woman seduces Dominic Toretto into the world of terrorism and leads him to betray those closest to him. Attempting to come back to a rationalized plot with its notorious, crazy action, the two unexpectedly clash. Trying to have the best of both worlds result in both with half the effort, leading this franchise into the ground. Leading further and further away from the purpose, while still entertaining, it's becoming common and repetitive. The initial concept and construction of this plot is something I can get behind, as it is both creative and adds a spark of something different. However, going about the same way with the same jokes, solutions, and themes, neglects the tiresome and seasoned reaction that comes with it, resulting in an uneventful and unvarying turn of events. Solely becoming just about the stunts and the craziest situations, the heart of the story is gone. The Fate of the Furious tries its best to please the fans, but goes off the rails and loses its roots. Having no relevance within the ongoing storyline and failing to make the expected over-the-top stunts tangible, this should be the cut-off for this series before it ruins the name. 4/10
5.5/10
|
Furious 7:
Storyline:
Deckard Shaw seeks revenge for his brother toward Dom and his crew. This film altogether did not need to be made, it accomplished very little and forcefully included too much star power for no reason. Considering this was pointless to the ongoing storyline, it loses practicality and relevance in the majority of areas. Very few moments featured toned down, lifelike stunts, and those were the only intense and realistic scenes. Most of them, however, might have been entertaining but were too over-the-top to wrap your head around to be anything worth talking about. Additionally, including too many supporting characters became distracting. Though trying to create a complex plot to balance the action only halts the progression of the film as it's too much to focus on at once. With this, the final few moments on screen and farewell to Paul Walker is enough to have this film be worth it. Tears were undoubtedly shed, as the raw performances let the simple but effective theme shine through. Struggles within the film aside, having a sentimental finale, perfect song, and a heartfelt goodbye, Furious 7 hits home for the fans even with a shaky film. 6.5/10
7/10
|
Fast & Furious 6:
Storyline:
After Dom and Brian's heist in Rio, still living life as fugitives, the team joins for another job to take down a group of mercenaries in exchange for full pardons. Truthfully, while this is 100% over the top and blown out of proportion, this is upbeat, extreme, and familiar in a good way. Matching the tone from the film before, this takes the plot a step further by providing a pertinent antagonist that is involving while simultaneously providing practical film. Though not only about cars, this is the first step in taking the films to the point they are today - overly extravagant action and a heavy theme of family. While this reigns true and is intertwined within, the wholesome subject matter shines through. While most of the stunts were extreme for no true reason, it doesn't seem to matter as just about everything is incredibly realistic. Given that these events wouldn't happen in your day-to-day life, the individualized Fast & Furious world is once again in action, as this adds yet another installment that doesn't skimp on its entertaining action and worthwhile plot. However, all good things come to an end, as for this, the final act was just too much of an overstatement to fit in the category of a lifelike concept. Not hindering the entertainment value, rather its cinematic value, Fast & Furious 6 face a few hiccups along the way, but is still satisfying and intense. 7/10
8/10
|
Fast Five:
Storyline:
Living life on the run, Brian and Dom recruit a team to pull off one more job in Rio before the Federal Agent that's on their tail catches them. Being one of the best films within the series, being both made well and enjoyable, Fast Five not only brings back the nostalgic feeling of the first film but adds relevant characters in doing so. While it goes without saying that this without a doubt is not realistic, this creates a world that makes this feel real. Having authentic and intense stunts and action, this never misses a beat. Going from one moment to the next, the intensity never fails to keep the audience in the loop in a personal manner. The score, additionally, is one of the best within the franchise. Though similar to the first film, playing music at any given moment, this does so gracefully. Having a select tone that fits the makeup of the story, each scene corresponds with the next, creating a sophisticated vibe that fits in the world this provides. With all things considered, this series is entertaining, no matter which film you pick, but most of them do not treat the plot with as much care like this. Having a storyline with depth, powerful action, and creative thought, this is by far a must-see and lives up to its name, even with being the fifth installment. 7.5/10
8/10
|
Fast & Furious:
Storyline:
When infiltrating a drug cartel for different reasons, Brian O'Conner and Dominic Toretto cross paths and have to put their differences aside to find the answer. Fast & Furious is the start of these films slowly becoming out of control for no reason. While each film gets a tad out of hand throughout time, this is the turning point of these getting less rational. That being said, don't take that as a diss, as this film may not be stellar cinematically, but none of them necessarily are; however, that's not what these are about, rather they give a wholesome message and intense action. Lacking incredibly in dialogue, this storyline had no care in the world for non-foreseeable lines. Putting the characters into predictable circumstances every chance they could get, there wasn't much that couldn't be guessed. Although this isn't a deal-breaker, there just felt like a genuine lack of effort in this aspect. The racing, on the other hand, was paired and complimented by the action. Highlighting a more gritty antagonist/conflict made room for the entertainment factor to take control. While the audience can question the frequent continuity issues, poor storyline, and cheesy dialogue, all things considered, this is an easy watch, makes sense within the franchise, ends on a satisfying note, and that was the successful point of this film. 5/10
6.5/10
|
2 Fast 2 Furious:
Storyline:
Now ex-police officer, Brian O'Conner, gets cut a deal by federal agents to take down a powerful drug dealer for his freedom. Having sequels not be as good as the first reigns true for this, as it didn't go as far as ruining the name, but came very, very, close. The dialogue... while it's quite amusing and laughable now, it wasn't meant to be that way. Overly using slang after each sentence makes for a blocky and scripted feel from the actors, even if their chemistry felt genuine - no one talks like that and it is simply fake. Although this is one of the aspects that makes me hate to love this film, as it gets so cheesy it's humorous, it doesn't make for a solid plot. As in the first film, the vibe of the 2000s era of elongated camera shots and choppy editing is overtaking, as well. That being said, there is an equal amount of cool, realistic looking stunts and/or car scenes within that make this something to talk about. Although this is still an attention holder and a must-see for the people who watch the series, it is not engrossing. Though pleasing the entertainment factor of the street racing, it is not enough to persuade me to say this is a decent film. 2 Fast 2 Furious (and all other F&F films) will always have a special place in my heart and should be seen by all, whether or not if each one is out-of-this-world. 5/10
6.5/10
|
The Fast and the Furious:
Storyline:
An undercover cop infiltrates one of the biggest street racers' life to see who's behind the dirty money car hijackings. I am certain and inarguably admitting this film has a deeply rooted, sentimental connection toward me, as I grew up watching this religiously. Regardless, it's pretty hard not to enjoy this on any level, as it's upbeat, eye-catching, and who doesn't like Paul Walker. This is the epitome of an early 2000s film - corny dialogue, risky fashion, and overpowering music at any given time. With terrible, cheesy, editing in addition to random camera angles thrown in, the random inclination of aspects takes away from the authenticity (which was lacking, to begin with). While some (most) aspects lacked in genuineness, such as this, the bond between the main characters was enough to push aside the rest of poorly created additions, as it was absorbing. All things considered, the amount of negatives summed up is substantial; however, The Fast and the Furious will always be a great BAM! story that can hold anyone's attention. Having adrenaline-pumping car chases, realistic stunts, and a mix of a bunch of genres, this might not have everything there structurally but is a franchise that is well known and watched among all for a good reason. 6.5/10
8/10
|
Ocean's Eight:
Storyline:
Five years, eight months, 12 days and counting is how long it took Debbie Ocean to plan the heist of her life with an elite team. While the thought of Ocean's Eight might have been promising in production, the execution of this all-female cast fails in its presentation, lacks in its creativity, and is a predictable, overused concept. Driving from an idea that solely relies on an established name and franchise to carry it along, nothing was interesting to grasp onto throughout. There was no originality standing alone nor was it involving enough to further it along in the series -- therefore, providing no substance for the plot, the flat characters the coincide were not surprising. Additionally, taking truly talented actresses and throwing them into a forced female-only line-up, and twisting it into a contained and uninvolving storyline kills their power thus far. Creating a film off an idea that had no purpose makes for an addition to a franchise that comes close to ruining the name. Failing to be innovative, funny, or even mildly recommendable, it's safe to say you can go your life without seeing this and miss nothing. 3/10
3/10
|
Ocean's Thirteen:
Storyline:
Ocean and his crew plan to rob one of the most ruthless casino owners after he double-crosses their friend. With this third installment, it is coming back to the presence of a developed plot. The implications of going back to the first film with cheesy aspects and dumb humor were done well; however, the entire production felt forced from the beginning, as it did not need to be made and the plot is irrelevant to the characters. The problem with this is not this film individually, rather the series altogether. Along with too many other franchises to name, Ocean's Thirteen falls into another category of making more films within the series for the paycheck instead of what matters - creating a good film. By no means is this a poorly created film, as I was entertained and there were some fun characteristics this provides, alternatively, I wish it wouldn't have been made, as looking at the bigger picture, this is pointless. While the ending sealed the deal for the characters, their development, and the ongoing story, even being cheesy, it doesn't hide the fact this was enjoyable. These films are funny, energetic, and are always a good choice when wanting something non-complicated and simply effortless. 6/10
6.5/10
|
Ocean's Twelve:
Storyline:
After pulling one of the biggest heists, the casino owner who Ocean’s team robbed demands that the crew pays his money back, but with interest. The gang has to pull a job in Europe to afford it. Matching the same feel-good cast and energetic feel, Ocean's Twelve maintains the same vibe that is intriguing. But, as most sequels go, this lost the focus of the story entirely. Having a great soundtrack yet again, it sadly became overpowering at times. As this statement can stand true for the entire film as a whole, this is another sequel to a franchise that doesn’t ruin the name, rather makes you question if it was made for a money grab or true purpose within the series. However, pure joy comes from the unbothered opening act, as it sets the mood for what's to come. Additionally adding more aspects with clever dialogue that was humorous, they were masked by no presence of a plot. Being more of a happy, uplifting watch, this film is not as quality cinematically but does hold your interest effortlessly. 5/10
6.5/10
|
Ocean's Eleven:
Storyline:
Less than 24 hours after his parole, Danny Ocean is setting up his biggest heist yet from a Las Vegas casino with the help of his team. This is simply one of those films that will always be entertaining no matter how many times you see it; Ocean's Eleven will find a way to hold your interest and always will be re-watchable. Never consisting of a dull moment, there is not one scene that doesn't prove to have relevance. Going from character to character/scene to scene, whether action-packed or not, the adrenaline is high and has a stable flow that keeps you on your toes. Although filled with a star-powered cast, the performances were spot on. While the most memorable performance is from Brad Pitt, who is both laughable and unique, the entire cast were ones that shouldn't go unnoticed. With a witty and quick on its feet script as well, these performances were complemented with lines that were written well. Featuring a soundtrack that effortlessly matches the vibe of the plot, it creates yet another aspect that just makes this a fun and entertaining watch. Ending with a fulfilling heist, this film is incredibly watchable and satisfying. 7.5/10
8/10
|
Back to the Future:
Storyline:
Marty McFly gets sent back into the 50s when an experiment created by his friend, Doc goes wrong. He has to make his parents fall in love before he goes back or else he will never exist. Undeniably a classic, this film has aged just as well compared to when it first came out. Achieving an intriguing watch throughout its course, this is original content that isn't always present in Sci-Fi storylines. The comedic yet serious script provides some wholesome lines and/or moments. Having these instances purely placed, it was effortless and had the feeling transferred through the audience. Michael J. Fox made his character so entertaining. Creating a practical teen that can be relatable no matter what age you are, he takes the extra step to make it all feel natural. The soundtrack was consistent as well. Not only did the sound correlate with the overall tone of the film, but it did it in a way where it wasn't even noticeable by how graceful it was. Not to mention how priceless The Power of Love is as the featured song. Despite the film as a whole incorporating some cheesy characteristics, it doesn't take away from the solid story. Being innovative for its time and just as influential today, this is a must-see for everyone. 8.5/10
8.5/10
|
John Wick:
Storyline:
Retired assassin, John Wick becomes the relentless killer he was known as before after his wife's sudden death and murder of his puppy. Out of films made in history, but especially recent era films, this franchise is hands down in my list of favorites, everything about it is real. Keanu Reeves was made for this role. Everything about his character is perfectly expressed, developed, and shown through his great deliverance and realistic action choreography. Completing his own stunts pays off and adds toward the level of believability of the film, never once did anything feel unrealistic or scripted. The lighting within the film was beautifully done. While it foreshadowed events, it did it with ease and simplicity. Paired with the creative directing, each scene flowed seamlessly into the next without hesitation. In general, this is a great revenge story. While it may be a familiar plot, it adds its own modern, original take to it; it's suspenseful, high paced, and an overall energetic story that lives up to its name. 8.5/10
8.5/10
|
Angel Has Fallen:
Storyline:
Secret Service Agent, Mike Banning is taken into custody after the failed attempt to assassinate the President. He escapes and tries to clear his name and save the country from the real threat. This third installment chose to focus a decent amount of time on his home life with his family and tried to take a small step away from the constant action. This was the worst section of the film and was poorly done. The acting & dialogue was incredibly rigid, dry, and not amusing; the entirety of their screen time was boring and predictable. The action sequences were very entertaining. Not only were the stunts realistic (besides a few minor exceptions), but they were up close and personal for the whole film. Along with that, the build-up of suspense kept me on edge until the end. The thing with these kinds of storylines is that we all know in the end what is going to happen, so obviously after finishing the film it seems predictable. At the moment, nothing ever felt this way, though. It was presented, executed, and developed well. The music at times felt a little overpowering, but for the most part, it added to the suspense and anticipation this had to offer. Some of the main characters or events that seemed to have much relevance either were not developed enough and/or ditched halfway through the film. While I'm taking this film for what it's worth and made up to be, it's not that big of a deal, just needs to be mentioned. 6/10
7/10
|
Olympus Has Fallen:
Storyline:
When the White House is taken over by terrorists, Mike Banning is the only Secret Service Agent left to save the President and the hostages. This kept my interest and was entertaining all the way till the end, but it did have the feeling of being just like everything else in the genre. It had intense action scenes that were pretty realistic and high adrenaline fighting choreography. I get what the opening scene did for the story, how it established the bond between the characters and set up the story, but it felt awkwardly placed. Feeling rushed from the get-go, it didn't feel genuine, only there for a reference/backstory. The production of the film was done really well. The further it progressed, the more I was drawn in and captivated. Each scene flowed into the next with no hesitation. While it did have a cheesy ending, it never felt that way at the moment, once it was done, then all those thoughts came about. The small snippet of his wife and his life at home felt incredibly forced and scripted. It made sense the way it was shown within the story but did not comfortably fit this action-packed plot. 6.5/10
7/10
|
Split:
Storyline:
Kevin has shown 23 different personalities to his psychiatrist, but one still remains submerged. While he is fighting to gain control over his body, she tries to find out what he's hiding. The idea of this film is very complex and interesting, but it just didn't live up to its potential. Having many moments when it was incredibly slow, it served no purpose and was extremely awkward. Having other scenes that could have used the down time, it left underdeveloped areas on characters that should not be left to infer. Likewise, with no time management, there was just the same amount of overused aspects with characters. Although, not everything was bad. James McAvoy was dedicated and clearly the frontrunner for the film as a whole. Out of the numerous and differentiated personalities he has, only a few were shown. As each character was extravagantly different and unique, he was personable and unquestionably believable. The ending, having the cheesy connection to Unbreakable (which was expected), as pointless as it was, it was forced. Not that this was what ruined the story, rather it was just icing on the cake, as the two could have been connected in a better way just like the film could have been executed better. 6.5/10
6.5/10
|
Unbreakable:
Storyline:
A security guard finds himself in a mysterious theory when he is the sole survivor in a train crash. As just about every M. Night Shyamalan film goes, there is an extravagant build-up to a disappointing finale. Unbreakable has a clever idea that strives with a lack of information, but due to poor execution, a non-satisfying climax, and too few details, the film blurs into the rest of the products in the genre. Having well-acted performances that fit the distinctive personalities of each individual is just about the only stabilizing factor. Despite the story they were put in making them underdeveloped, the commitment from each role collectively brings everything together. However, considering this, trying to incorporate too many artsy aspects gets the better of the plot. Trying to showcase more things between the lines in terms of camera angles, analyzing lines, and afterthought, there is too much left unsaid. There is not enough desire from the audience to try to work out the details, as this feels drawn-out and loses the anticipation from the non-powerful ending. 6.5/10
6.5/10
|
Terminator: Dark Fate
Storyline:
A young factory worker is being protected by a future hybrid human, Sarah Conner, and the T-800 Terminator. It's genuinely sad to see a franchise such as this turn into a money grab with no dedication put into it. Ruining character arcs to the point where it's just a waste of time is not a thought on anyone's mind because it still makes money. This is a problem, as this franchise is only being made for quantity over quality. Honestly, I don't know why there was effort lost regarding the special effects, as this is a Sci-Fi based film. Practically everything was ridiculous to watch, these aspects were unbelievable, hard to watch and most likely originated from lazy production. The only exception to this is the actual terminators themselves, as they have always been realistic and extremely believable throughout all the films. It hopefully comes as no surprise that this story was overly predictable, just by judging from the trailers. Expectedly, it was paired with flat and lifeless characters that were terribly portrayed and developed. Leaving no originality or depth to anything regarding them, it became annoying to watch after the first 30 minutes. I hope this will be the last of these films, as they are coming close to ruining the name, but no matter what, Hollywood will find a way to destroy the name of another franchise if it's not this one. 2/10
2/10
|
The Terminator:
Storyline:
Disguised as a human, a cyborg assassin, the Terminator, is sent from the future to kill Sarah Conner to prevent the birth of her unborn son. Factoring alone the time this was made and what an innovative picture this produced, it still has the same effect today. Creating a solid idea all around, this was well-thought-out and executed. As I've said before, classics are dubbed classic for a reason, which includes this. The famous lines that come from this are without a doubt cheesy, but incredibly witty. Being comedic and serious, this provides an intriguing watch up until the end. The special effects, specifically for the Terminator, were extremely life-like. Though some things could be updated with today's tech, considering there was nowhere near the resources we have now, that contributes to the aspects that amount to how watchable this is. That being said, the only negative of these effects were the scenes of the future, it was clearly fake and honestly quite comical. While I can re-watch this any time and still enjoy it, that says a lot. Although a few scenes were incredibly cheesy, making it hard not to laugh, that doesn't hinder the fact that this is just a good film; everyone needs to see this at one point in their life. 8/10
8/10
|
Jack Reacher:
Storyline:
An attack killing five innocent civilians brings an ex-Army investigator, Jack Reacher, to help figure out what happened. This might not be out of the box creative as far as the central idea, yet what details are filled inside is intriguing - a stellar lead performance, iconic moments, and simply a compelling storyline. Tom Cruise offers a character that the audience can relate to and who has a solid development. While on the surface, being short-spoken and across the board bland, Cruise proves that wrong, as the further you get in the story, the more invested in the characters you become. Just an enjoyable aspect of this film is the amount of comical, but sensible instances Reacher found himself in and out of. While his solutions to problems are very cheesy and dumb, they never are made out to be within the film, as he uses what he has at any given moment and nothing ever works out for him. This makes for a different and not-so-serious, yet serious take on a typical, suspenseful story such as this. 7/10
7/10
|
Mission: Impossible - Fallout
Storyline:
Ethan Hunt and the IMF are challenged when the terrorist group known as the Apostles, plan to set off three Plutonium bombs. Being the fifth installment of the Mission: Impossible films, I was happy to see they didn’t ruin the franchise and created a practical idea once again. Featuring all the classic MIP scenes, the old was mixed perfectly with the new; largely for the infamous predictable, but the not-so-predictable plot, the twists, and surprises were frequent but sensible. I've said it once and I'm saying it again, the action and chase scenes were directed, produced and choreographed flawlessly. Even though some action sequences seemed hard to believe, everything was perfectly combined and it wasn't too much to where it wasn't justifiable. The only pure negative I have to offer is Henry Cavil. This partially is because I think he is a terrible actor, but also because this film proves my point. His character had no dimension, was so foreseeable, and just extremely dull. Possibly my favorite part about this installment was that Ethan Hunt truly didn’t win each time. Though things always go wrong, really nothing worked out for him, but everyone rolled with it. Making an even more realistic story, the problems the characters were faced with were authentic. 8/10
8/10
|
Mission: Impossible - Rouge Nation
Storyline:
With the IMF now disbanded, a new threat, the Syndicate emerges. Ethan Hunt gathers his team to face their most impossible mission yet without the help or approval of the government. Again, the stunts were anticipating and lifelike. Genuinely, the previous installment I said they can't outdo themselves, yet they have done it once again. Truthfully just making a solid, matchless film all around, this is one for the books. Incorporating witty dialogue, the tone was smart and on cue. Though the action was without a doubt intense, the script actually provided the best of both worlds. This installment brought back the cheesy/awesome opening credits, which was always an element that was great. Having the same feeling from the very first film, I loved the integration of the classic aspects with a fresh plot. The opening scene was just simply really cool. It was the start of an anticipating story to catch your attention. Plus, there was only one over-the-top scene, which actually started great, but ended by going too far. Overall, this is an exciting addition from the perspective of being in a franchise or a standalone film and has a predictable, but not-so-predictable, solid finish. 8.5/10
8.5/10
|
Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol
Storyline:
Blamed for a terrorist attack on the Kremlin, Ethan Hunt and his entire team are disavowed by the U.S. Government. With no resources, he has to hunt down the real suspects. Rarely do I consider anything past a sequel in a film series to be better than the first installment - but this is one of those times. Never would I think this film is the fourth installment to a franchise because the entire film is made up of innovative and original concepts; it consists of intense action and truly mesmerizing moments that continue to amaze me. The crisp action with upbeat choreography is so carefully constructed, it is spot on, realistic, and entertaining. The only negative I have toward this film is the incorporation of a couple of unbelievable scenes, especially the climax/finale. Starting rationally, these instances, though so few, were enough to question as everything else wasn't over-the-top. Although, the final scene on-screen leads seamlessly into the next film and gets the anticipation(which spoiler alert, is just as good!). However, the performances, introduction of new characters, and plot were easily just as good. Ethan Hunt never fails to provide a protagonist that is always believable no matter what he goes through, yet everyone serves a purpose to the film and are just as important, which isn't always easy to do. 8/108/10 |
Mission: Impossible III
Storyline:
Retired, training recruits, and about to get married, Ethan Hunt is faced with another impossible mission - a ruthless arms dealer who will do anything to get what he wants. This was more of a wholesome film than an overall cohesive one, but it genuinely makes sense and puts the characters into perspective. Yet this still strives with creative and entertaining action sequences/choreography, as always. Dispensing witty dialogue so effortlessly, this film finally got its barrings with featuring clever lines; these were entertaining, laughable, and relatable, mainly without being forced. The dumb supporting characters were very upsetting, as they were thrown in with no substance. Treated as if they were with the franchise all along, they felt like the odd man out and acting as if they belonged, rather than truly belonging. Be that as it may, the antagonist was tense and unsettling. Though this was an effort throughout the entire film and as time went on, become stronger, he was well created and added to the development of the characters within the franchise. 7/10
7/10
|
Mission: Impossible 2
Storyline:
Ethan Hunt leads his team to find and destroy a German-made virus. He races against time and a group of terrorists who stole the cure to save the world. Starting out with a wimpy build of a beginning, the effort to mix this as a romance made for a lagging opening act. This tried to go for a sappy love story as its base with an action-packed story that is already known, to which was plainly not done well. However, the lack of a storyline is truly the defeat of this film. Coming off an already established name, it is pretty straightforward what someone will get out of this, yet the focus on the quality of detail was not there. I will say this doesn't halt the film's value of its intriguing pace, instead, it doesn't give something that should have fit as one. The excessive spin kicks from Tom Cruise (which truly is comical if you pay attention to it) and realistic fighting choreography came to save the day in this film, though. The intriguing last act makes up for the lack of consideration the rest of the film entails. While this still comes as a disappointment to the franchise, there will always be a positive BAM! draw factor to all Mission: Impossible's. 6/10
7/10
|
Mission: Impossible
Storyline:
Ethan Hunt, a government agent, goes on a covert assignment with his team. When his entire team is murdered, he is framed for their deaths and has to prove his innocence. Truthfully, I don't think this film knew what it was embarking on while creating it. Although this has its fair share of cheesy moments and outdated technology, this is a creative start to an iconic franchise. First things first, the opening credits always be entertaining. Normally credits roll in and are just something you endure before getting to what you want to see, but enjoying the opening credits is 100% a part of enjoying the film overall - and it is worth mentioning. The storyline is amazing in the sense of unease throughout the entire film. As an audience member, you are personally thrown into the plot of no one knowing who is who, and the anticipation that comes with it. Though a few times this got out of hand as far as having a few unrealistic scenes, that doesn't change the believable idea this film provided as a whole. This is incredibly entertaining and is classic by all the unconventional aspects it includes. 7.5/10
8/10
|